S B Nam1, D W Jeong2, K S Choo3, K J Nam4, J-Y Hwang4, J W Lee5, J Y Kim5, S J Lim6. 1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, South Korea. 2. Department of Family Medicine, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, South Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea. Electronic address: kschoo0618@naver.com. 4. Department of Radiology, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea. 5. Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, South Korea. 6. Department of Cardiology, Kim Hae Gang-il Hospital, KyoungNam, South Korea.
Abstract
AIM: To compare the image quality of computed tomography angiography (CTA) reconstructed by sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) with that of advanced modelled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-one children (8.23±13.92 months) with CHD who underwent CTA were enrolled. Images were reconstructed using SAFIRE (strength 5) and ADMIRE (strength 5). Objective image qualities (attenuation, noise) were measured in the great vessels and heart chambers. Two radiologists independently calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) by measuring the intensity and noise of the myocardial walls. Subjective noise, diagnostic confidence, and sharpness at the level prior to the first branch of the main pulmonary artery were also graded by the two radiologists independently. RESULTS: The objective image noise of ADMIRE was significantly lower than that of SAFIRE in the right atrium, right ventricle, and myocardial wall (p<0.05); however, there were no significant differences observed in the attenuations among the four chambers and great vessels, except in the pulmonary arteries (p>0.05). The mean CNR values were 21.56±10.80 for ADMIRE and 18.21±6.98 for SAFIRE, which were significantly different (p<0.05). In addition, the diagnostic confidence of ADMIRE was significantly lower than that of SAFIRE (p<0.05), while the subjective image noise and sharpness of ADMIRE were not significantly different (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: CTA using ADMIRE was superior to SAFIRE when comparing the objective and subjective image quality in children with CHD.
AIM: To compare the image quality of computed tomography angiography (CTA) reconstructed by sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) with that of advanced modelled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-one children (8.23±13.92 months) with CHD who underwent CTA were enrolled. Images were reconstructed using SAFIRE (strength 5) and ADMIRE (strength 5). Objective image qualities (attenuation, noise) were measured in the great vessels and heart chambers. Two radiologists independently calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) by measuring the intensity and noise of the myocardial walls. Subjective noise, diagnostic confidence, and sharpness at the level prior to the first branch of the main pulmonary artery were also graded by the two radiologists independently. RESULTS: The objective image noise of ADMIRE was significantly lower than that of SAFIRE in the right atrium, right ventricle, and myocardial wall (p<0.05); however, there were no significant differences observed in the attenuations among the four chambers and great vessels, except in the pulmonary arteries (p>0.05). The mean CNR values were 21.56±10.80 for ADMIRE and 18.21±6.98 for SAFIRE, which were significantly different (p<0.05). In addition, the diagnostic confidence of ADMIRE was significantly lower than that of SAFIRE (p<0.05), while the subjective image noise and sharpness of ADMIRE were not significantly different (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: CTA using ADMIRE was superior to SAFIRE when comparing the objective and subjective image quality in children with CHD.
Authors: Doris Leithner; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Martin Beeres; Julian L Wichmann; Scherwin Mahmoudi; Simon S Martin; Lukas Lenga; Moritz H Albrecht; Christian Booz; Thomas J Vogl; Jan-Erik Scholtz Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Lukas Lenga; Franziska Trapp; Moritz H Albrecht; Julian L Wichmann; Addison A Johnson; Ibrahim Yel; Tommaso D'Angelo; Christian Booz; Thomas J Vogl; Simon S Martin Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lukas Lenga; Marvin Lange; Simon S Martin; Moritz H Albrecht; Christian Booz; Ibrahim Yel; Christophe T Arendt; Thomas J Vogl; Doris Leithner Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 3.039