| Literature DB >> 28764749 |
Manisha Bhatnagar1, Nandan Sarkar1, Nigam Gandharv2, Ona Apang3, Sarman Singh2, Sabari Ghosal4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ethnic population of Arunachal Pradesh uses a number of orchids as such, or in decoction for various ailments. Three untapped orchids namely, Rhynchostylis retusa, Tropidia curculioides and Satyrium nepalense, traditionally used in tuberculosis, asthma and cold stage of malaria in folk medicine, were selected for the present study.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial; Antileishmanial; Antimycobacterial; Rhynchostylis retusa; Satyrium nepalense; Tropidia curculioides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28764749 PMCID: PMC5540558 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1884-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Orchid species collected from Arunachal pradesh (AR); their geographical location, medicinal use and conservation status
| S.No. | Name of species and voucher no. | Place of collection | Geographical location | Altitude (m) | Medicinal use | Conservation status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Doimara | N 26058′02.0″ & | 357 | Rheumatism, asthma, tuberculosis, nervous twitchings, cramps, infantile epilepsy | Vulnerable |
| 2 |
| Tippi | N 2700′14.9″ & | 339 | Malaria and diarrhoea | Rare |
| 3 |
| Sange | N 27027′30.1″ & | 3072 | Malaria, dysentery and aphrodisiac | Endemic |
Details of extraction and fractionation of medicinal orchids obtained from AR
| S.No. | Name | Part used for fractionation | Fraction/Extract | Yield (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| Roots (1.178 kg) | diethyl ether fraction | 18.52 |
|
| 12.77 | |||
| aqueous extract | 5.00 | |||
| Stem (0.354 kg) | diethyl ether fraction (RrS Et2O) | 8.44 | ||
|
| 4.82 | |||
| aqueous extract | 11.80 | |||
| Leaves (0.726 kg) | diethyl ether fraction (RrL Et2O) | 6.28 | ||
|
| 10.92 | |||
| aqueous extract | 7.01 | |||
| 2 |
| Roots (0.922 kg) | diethyl ether fraction | 5.18 |
|
| 16.46 | |||
| aqueous extract | 38.99 | |||
| Stem (0.302 kg) | diethyl ether fraction | 2.13 | ||
|
| 15.62 | |||
| aqueous extract | 4.19 | |||
| Leaves (0.310 kg) | diethyl ether fraction | 16.00 | ||
|
| 11.96 | |||
| aqueous extract | 1.65 | |||
| 3 |
| Pseudobulb |
| 5.12 |
| dichloromethane fraction | 8.32 | |||
| ethyl acetate fraction | 2.18 | |||
| aqueous extract | 4.32 | |||
| Flower |
| 3.50 | ||
| dichloromethane fraction | 2.10 | |||
| ethyl acetate fraction | 3.42 | |||
| aqueous extract | 5.12 | |||
| Leaves and Stem |
| 4.30 | ||
| dichloromethane fraction | 6.02 | |||
| ethyl acetate fraction | 2.12 | |||
| aqueous extract | 6.30 |
Phytochemical screening of crude fractions and extracts of three medicinal orchids of AR
| S.No | Name | Alkaloids | Flavanoids | Steroids | Reducing sugars | Cardiac glycosides | Terpenoids | Anthraquinones | Tannins | Phlobatanins | Saponins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RrR Et2O | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| 2 | RrR | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | + | − |
| 3 | RrR Aq ext | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | + |
| 4 | RrS Et2O | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
| 5 | RrS | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − |
| 6 | RrS Aq ext | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | + | − |
| 7 | RrL Et2O | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − |
| 8 | RrL | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| 9 | RrL Aq ext | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − |
| 10 | TcR Et2O | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| 11 | TcR | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | − |
| 12 | TcR Aq ext | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | + |
| 13 | TcS Et2O | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | − |
| 14 | TcS | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 15 | TcS Aq ext | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | − |
| 16 | TcL Et2O | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | − |
| 17 | TcL | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| 18 | TcL Aq ext | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | − | − | + |
| 19 | SnP | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 20 | SnP DCM | − | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | + |
| 21 | SnP EtOAc | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | + |
| 22 | SnP Aq ext | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | + |
| 23 | SnF | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | + |
| 24 | SnF DCM | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 25 | SnF EtOAc | + | + | + | − | + | − | + | + | − | + |
| 26 | SnF Aq ext | − | − | + | − | + | − | + | + | − | + |
| 27 | SnL | + | − | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 28 | SnL DCM | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| 29 | SnL EtOAc | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | + |
| 30 | SnL Aq ext | − | − | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + |
“+” indicates presence, “-” indicates Absence
Flavanoids, steriods, alkaloids and tannins were detected by NaOH-HCl test, Salkowski’s reaction, dragondorff reaction and ferric chloride test respectively
Additional tests were carried out to check the presence of reducing sugar, cardiac glycosides, phlobatannins, anthraqinones, saponins and terpenoids (Rajesh et al., 2010)
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC in μg/mL) of the antimycobacterial activity of crude extracts/fractions of three orchids against H37Rv and MDR strain
| S.No | Extract/Fraction | MIC values against H37Rv (μg/mL) | MDR Strain- |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tb-14,348/16 (μg/mL) | |||
| 1 | RrR Et2O | 62.5 | 125 |
| 2 | RrR | 250 | 500 |
| 3 | RrR Aq ext | >1000 | >1000 |
| 4 | RrS Et2O | 125 | 125 |
| 5 | RrS | >1000 | >1000 |
| 6 | RrS Aq ext | 500 | 500 |
| 7 | RrL Et2O | 500 | 500 |
| 8 | RrL | >1000 | >1000 |
| 9 | RrL Aq ext | >1000 | >1000 |
| 10 | TcR Et2O | 125 | 104.16 |
| 11 | TcR | >1000 | >1000 |
| 12 | TcR Aq ext | 250 | 250 |
| 13 | TcS Et2O | 500 | >1000 |
| 14 | TcS | >1000 | >1000 |
| 15 | TcS Aq ext | 1000 | >1000 |
| 16 | TcL Et2O | 375 | >1000 |
| 17 | TcL | >1000 | >1000 |
| 18 | TcL Aq ext | 500 | >1000 |
| 19 | SnP | 250 | 500 |
| 20 | SnP DCM | 500 | 500 |
| 21 | SnP EtOAc | 125 | 250 |
| 22 | SnP Aq ext | >1000 | >1000 |
| 23 | SnF | 15.7 | 62.5 |
| 24 | SnF DCM | 500 | >1000 |
| 25 | SnF EtOAc | 125 | 250 |
| 26 | SnF Aq ext | 187.5 | 250 |
| 27 | SnL | 125 | 250 |
| 28 | SnL DCM | 500 | 500 |
| 29 | SnL EtOAc | >1000 | 500 |
| 30 | SnL Aq ext | >1000 | 500 |
| Rifampicin (positive control) | 0.08 | 1 |
Experiments were carried out in triplicate and results are expressed as mean of three replicate experiments. All crude extracts or fractions were dissolved in 0.2% DMSO and distilled water. Anti-Tb drug (RIF) was prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration range for each tested extracts or fractions were 15.6–1000 μg/mL; tested concentration range for positive control drug (RIF) was 0.25–16 μg/mL
In vitro leishmanicidal activity against promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes of L. donovani
| S.No. | Extracts and fractions | IC50 ± SD(μg/ml) promastigotes | IC50 ± SD (μg/ml) amastigotes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RrR Et2O | 56.04 ± 0.02 | 18.42 ± 0.26 |
| 2 | RrR | 500 | 125 |
| 3 | RrR Aq ext | 1000 | 1000 |
| 4 | RrS Et2O | 500 | 500 |
| 5 | RrS | 1000 | 500 |
| 6 | RrS Aq ext | 1000 | 500 |
| 7 | RrL Et2O | 500 | 250 |
| 8 | RrL | 1000 | 500 |
| 9 | RrL Aq ext | 300 | 250 |
| 10 | TcR Et2O | 250 | 100 |
| 11 | TcR | 1000 | 1000 |
| 12 | TcR Aq ext | 500 | 200 |
| 13 | TcS Et2O | >1000 | 500 |
| 14 | TcS | 1000 | 550 |
| 15 | TcS Aq ext | 500 | 500 |
| 16 | TcL Et2O | >1000 | 500 |
| 17 | TcL | >1000 | 500 |
| 18 | TcL Aq ext | >1000 | >1000 |
| 19 | SnP | 76.32 ± 2.30 | 23.80 ± 0.73 |
| 20 | SnP DCM | 1000 | 500 |
| 21 | SnP EtOAc | 500 | 200 |
| 22 | SnP Aq ext | 500 | 500 |
| 23 | SnF | 65.64 ± 0.22 | 22.16 ± 0.99 |
| 24 | SnF DCM | 1000 | 250 |
| 25 | SnF EtOAc | 500 | 250 |
| 26 | SnF Aq ext | 500 | 500 |
| 27 | SnL | 500 | 200 |
| 28 | SnL DCM | 1000 | 500 |
| 29 | SnL EtOAc | >1000 | 500 |
| 30 | SnL Aq ext | 1000 | 1000 |
| Amphotericin B | 0.055 ± 0.5 | 0.25 ± 0.48 | |
| Miltefosine | 8.11 ± 0.36 | 4.37 ± 0.51 |
The effect of different plant fractions on promastigotes (Log phase; 1 × 106 cells/mL) and intracellularamastigotes were evaluated by MTT based colorimetric assay, efficacy was expressed in IC50 values
Standard deviation (SD) was calculated for IC50 < 125 μg/mL against promastigotes and amastigotes
Activity against promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes of Leishmania donovani, cytotoxicity in J774G8 macrophage cells of active fractions
| Plant fractions | Promastigote IC50 (μg/mL) | Amastigote | J774.G8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| RrR Et2O | 56.04 ± 0.20 | 18.42 ± 0.26 | 97.2 ± 1.2 |
| SnP | 76.32 ± 2.30 | 23.80 ± 0.73 | 89.4 ± 4.7 |
| SnF | 65.64 ± 0.22 | 22.16 ± 0.99 | 100.7 ± 1.7 |
Data is presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments
IC inhibitory concentration of 50% parasites, CC cytotoxicity concentration of 50% cells
Antibacterial activity of various extracts/fractions of orchids by agar-well diffusion method
| Gram positive | Gram negative | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. No | Extracts/fractions |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 | RrR Et2O | 7.33 ± 0.57 | 7.66 ± 0.9 | 6.33 ± 0.57 | 13 ± 0.8 | 7 ± 0.81 |
| 2 | RrR | 6.3 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 1 | 6.66 ± 0.5 | 7.3 ± 0.5 | 6.66 ± 0.5 |
| 3 | RrR Aq ext | 6.0 ± 1 | 6.0 ± 1 | 6.0 ± 1 | 6.0 ± 1 | 6.0 ± 1 |
| 4 | RrS Et2O | 6.33 ± 0.4 | 7.66 ± 0.4 | 7.66 ± 0.4 | 6.66 ± 0.9 | 6.66 ± 0.4 |
| 5 | RrS | 6.66 ± 0.5 | 7.33 ± 0.5 | 6 ± 0 | 7.33 ± 0.5 | 7.0 ± 0 |
| 6 | RrS Aq ext | NI | 6.66 ± 0.5 | 6.33 ± 0.5 | 5.66 ± 0.5 | 8.0 ± 1.0 |
| 7 | RrL Et2O | 8 ± 0.8 | 8.33 ± 0.4 | 7 ± 0 | 8.33 ± 0.4 | 9.33 ± 0.4 |
| 8 | RrL | 6.66 ± 0.5 | 11.33 ± 0.5 | 7.33 ± 0.5 | 7.33 ± 0.5 | 8 ± 0 |
| 9 | RrL Aq ext | NI | 7.33 ± 0.5 | 6.0 ± 0 | 8.66 ± 0.5 | 7.0 ± 0 |
| 10 | TcR Et2O | 7.33 ± 0.57 | 12.66 ± 0.57 | NI | 7.66 ± 0.57 | 12.66 ± 0.57 |
| 11 | TcR | 7.66 ± 0.57 | 8.33 ± 0.57 | NI | 9.00 ± 0.00 | 8.33 ± 0.57 |
| 12 | TcR Aq ext | 8.33 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 7.33 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 |
| 13 | TcS Et2O | 7.66 ± 0.57 | 7.66 ± 0.57 | NI | 7.33 ± 0.57 | 8.33 ± 0.57 |
| 14 | TcS | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 8.33 ± 0.57 | NI | 8.00 ± 0.00 | 8.33 ± 0.57 |
| 15 | TcS Aq ext | 7.33 ± 0.57 | 7.33 ± 0.57 | NI | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.33 ± 0.57 |
| 16 | TcL Et2O | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.66 ± 0.57 | NI | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.33 ± 0.57 |
| 17 | TcL | 8.33 ± 0.57 | 8.33 ± 0.57 | NI | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.00 ± 0.00 |
| 18 | TcL Aq ext | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.33 ± 0.57 | NI | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.00 ± 0.00 |
| 19 | SnP | 12.23 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 7.66 ± 0.57 | 9.85 ± 0.57 |
| 20 | SnP DCM | 7.66 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 7.33 ± 0.57 | 8.33 ± 0.57 |
| 21 | SnP EtOAc | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.33 ± 0.57 |
| 22 | SnP Aq ext | 7.66 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 9.00 ± 0.00 | 8.33 ± 0.57 |
| 23 | SnF | 12.00 ± 0.00 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 8.00 ± 0.00 | 11.33 ± 0.57 |
| 24 | SnF DCM | 8.33 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.00 ± 0.00 |
| 25 | SnF EtOAc | 8.33 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 7.33 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 |
| 26 | SnF Aq ext | 7.33 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 7.33 ± 0.57 |
| 27 | SnL | 11.00 ± 0.00 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 9.00 ± 0.00 |
| 28 | SnL DCM | 9.00 ± 0.00 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 9.00 ± 0.00 | 8.33 ± 0.57 | 7.66 ± 0.57 |
| 29 | SnL EtOAc | 8.00 ± 0.00 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | 8.33 ± 0.57 | 7.66 ± 0.57 | 7.33 ± 0.57 |
| 30 | SnL Aq ext | 7.33 ± 0.57 | 7.00 ± 0.00 | NI | NI | NI |
| Tetracycline | 16.56 ± 0.58 | 15.71 ± 0.58 | 17.42 ± 0.58 | 15.71 ± 0.58 | 18.85 ± 0.58 | |
| Gentamycin | 15.76 ± 0.58 | 15.71 ± 0.58 | 11.56 ± 0.58 | 14.56 ± 0.58 | 18.79 ± 0.58 | |
Antibacterial activity expressed as diameter of zone of inhibition in mm including 6 mm as diameter of the well
Values represented as mean ± SD of three replicates
All compounds were tested at concentration of 1 mg/mL
30 μg Tetracycline and gentamycin discs were used as positive control
NI = no inhibition
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MICa in μg/mL) of the most potent fractions from three orchids
| Gram positive | Gram negative | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. No | Extracts/fractions |
|
|
|
|
| 1 | RrR Et2O | 250 | >500 | 104.16 | 250 |
| 2 | RrL | >500 | 250 | >1000 | 500 |
| 3 | TcR Et2O | 500 | 250 | 500 | 125 |
| 4 | SnP | 166.6 | 500 | >1000 | >1000 |
| 5 | SnF | 125 | 500 | 500 | 208.33 |
| 6 | SnL | 250 | >500 | >1000 | >500 |
| Tetracyclin | 0.5 | 16 | 3.7 | 1.9 | |
aMIC determined by microdilution method and expressed in μg/mL
Fig. 1Thin Layer Chromatography (pre-coated silica TLC plates) profile of bioactive fractions: a diethyl ether fraction of Rr Roots; b n -Hex fraction of Sn Flower; c n -Hex fraction of Sn Pseudobulb and (d) diethyl ether fraction of Tc Roots The TLC plates were developed in solvent system of varying polarity, i.e. ethyl acetate: n-Hexane (1:9, 3:7 and 1:1), [EH]. The plates were observed under UV light (254 nm)