Literature DB >> 28764270

Feasibility and Complications of Spinal Anaesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Our Experience.

Manoj Kamal1, Pradeep Sharma2, Geeta Singariya3, Rajesh Jain4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment modality used for the extraction of large renal stones, or multiple calculi or stones resistant to shock wave lithotripsy. The General Anaesthesia (GA) is the standard modality for PCNL. However, few studies conclude that Spinal Anaesthesia (SA) can be an alternative method of anaesthesia with similar incidence of complications. AIM: In our study we evaluated the feasibility of spinal anaesthesia in terms of intraoperative and postoperative results in patients undergoing PCNL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The total 1298 PCNL operations were done for kidney stone from January 2013 to December 2016, out of which 1160 patients underwent PCNL under SA while remaining 138 operations were carried out under GA in the prone position. We retrospectively collected data from the patient's documents. The intraoperative haemodynamic stability was primary objective, and average fall of haemoglobin, postoperative anaesthetic outcome like total tramadol used in first 24 hours, surgical outcome like total clearance of stone burden, patient satisfaction, surgeon satisfaction, need of blood transfusion, conversion to general anaesthesia and pleural puncture were the secondary objectives.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 38.0±17.1 years, and the mean operative time was 80.0±25.9 minutes. The mean calculus size was 30.2±11.8 mm. Return of sensory and motor activity in our study was 150.0±29.2 minutes and 111.0±18.8 minutes, respectively. In first 10 minutes of anaesthesia, 148 (12.75%) patients developed hypotension, which was managed by ephedrine 6 mg intravenously (IV). Total seventy two patients (6.2%) needed blood transfusion and 32 (2.75%) complained of headache, dizziness and low back pain for two to four days after the operation, which improved with analgesics and bed rest. Ninety percent of the patients had complete clearance of calculus or there were no significant residual calculi larger than 5 mm on follow up ultrasonography.
CONCLUSION: It can be concluded from our study that spinal anaesthesia is the safe and effective method of anaesthesia for PCNL in adult patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General anaesthesia; Regional anaesthesia; Renal stone

Year:  2017        PMID: 28764270      PMCID: PMC5535460          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26425.10111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  18 in total

1.  Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique.

Authors:  I Fernström; B Johansson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1976

2.  Results and complications of spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Sadrollah Mehrabi; Kambiz Karimzadeh Shirazi
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.510

3.  Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  M L Stoller; J S Wolf; M A St Lezin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Spinal Anaesthesia in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  R Shah; A S Thapa; N Lamichhane; S R Kc
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.406

5.  Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under assisted local anaesthesia: a prospective study on selected patients with upper urinary tract obstruction.

Authors:  Evangelos Aravantinos; Anastasios Karatzas; Stavros Gravas; Vassilios Tzortzis; Michael Melekos
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Evolving technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a developing country: Singapore General Hospital experience.

Authors:  M Y Wong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  Baris Kuzgunbay; Tahsin Turunc; Sule Akin; Pinar Ergenoglu; Anis Aribogan; Hakan Ozkardes
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Intraoperative blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidural versus general anesthesia.

Authors:  Y Shir; S N Raja; S M Frank; C B Brendler
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Comparison between spinal and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Gholamreza Movasseghi; Valiollah Hassani; Mahmood Reza Mohaghegh; Reza Safaeian; Saeid Safari; Mohammad Mahdi Zamani; Roya Nabizadeh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2013-12-26

Review 10.  Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Current Clinical Opinions and Anesthesiologists Perspective.

Authors:  Indira Malik; Rachna Wadhwa
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-27
View more
  1 in total

1.  Spinal versus general anesthesia during retrograde intra-renal surgery: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Olivero; Lorenzo Ball; Carlotta Fontaneto; Guglielmo Mantica; Paolo Bottino; Paolo Pelosi; Carlo Terrone
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-04-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.