Literature DB >> 28763814

Three modalities on common bile duct exploration.

Yong Zhou1, Xu-Dong Wu2, Wen-Zhang Zha1, Ren-Gen Fan1, Biao Zhang1, Yong-Hua Xu1, Cheng-Lin Qin1, Jing Jia3.   

Abstract

Background Choledocholithiasis can be managed by transcystic (TC) and transduct (TD) stone extraction or using cholangioscopy through the left hepatic duct orifice (LHD). Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of common bile duct exploration through the TC approach, TD approach, and LHD approach for choledocholithiasis, with a specific emphasis on the TC and LHD approaches versus the TD approach. Methods Between January 2011 and June 2014, a total of 172 choledocholithiasis patients accompanied by cholecystitis and/or left intrahepatic gallstones were scheduled for laparoscopic or open common bile duct (CBD) exploration using cholangioscopy through the CBD (TD group: n = 72), cystic duct (TC group: n = 63), or LHD orifice (LHD group: n = 37). T-tube insertion was performed in selected patients. Patients were regularly followed up at bimonthly intervals or more frequently in presence of any symptom. Primary outcomes measures included overall operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative bile leaks. Results Successful bile duct clearance was 100 % in the TD group, 93.6 % in the TC group, and 90.9 % in the LHD group. Sixteen cases in the TD group had T-tube placement in contrast to no cases in the TC and LHD groups. There were more bile leaks after TD stone extraction (12.5 %) than TC (3.2 %) and LHD stone extraction (0 %), which prolonged hospitalization in the TD group more than in the TC and LHD groups. For choledocholithiasis patients accompanied by cholecystitis, 2 groups (TC and TD groups) were comparable in operative time. However, for choledocholithiasis patients accompanied by left intrahepatic gallstones, the LHD group had a significantly shorter operative time than the TD group (121.1 ± 16.9 minutes vs. 149.3 ± 42.8 minutes, p < 0.05). Conclusion The TD group had a higher stone clearance rate but was associated with a higher risk of bile leaks. TC and LHD stone extraction, which seems to be the more effective approach with lower complication rates, is an accessible technique that simplifies the operation procedure by avoiding choledochotomy and subsequent T-tube insertion. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28763814     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-112655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0044-2771            Impact factor:   2.000


  2 in total

1.  Left liver anatomical resection via the left vertical groove and intraoperative antegrade cholangioscopy in patients with left-sided hepatolithiasis and previous biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  Yong Zhou; Guo-Qin Jiang; Ren-Gen Fan; Wen-Zhang Zha; Xu-Dong Wu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 2.  Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caining Lei; Tingting Lu; Wenwen Yang; Man Yang; Hongwei Tian; Shaoming Song; Shiyi Gong; Jia Yang; Wenjie Jiang; Kehu Yang; Tiankang Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.