Literature DB >> 28763808

Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy is associated with a lower adenoma miss rate: a multicenter randomized tandem study.

Konstantinos Triantafyllou1, Dimitrios Polymeros1, Periklis Apostolopoulos2, Catarina Lopes Brandao3, Paraskevas Gkolfakis1, Alessandro Repici4, Ioannis S Papanikolaou1, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro3,5, George Alexandrakis2, Cesare Hassan6.   

Abstract

Background and study aims The Endocuff (ARC Medical Design, Leeds, UK) is a device that, when mounted on the tip of an endoscope, may assist with inspection of a greater surface of the colonic mucosa by pulling backwards, flattening, and stretching the colonic folds as the endoscope is gradually withdrawn. We aimed to compare the adenoma miss rates of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy with those of conventional colonoscopy. Patients and methods The included patients underwent same-day, back-to-back, (Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy as the index procedure followed by conventional colonoscopy or vice versa, randomly assigned 1:1) colonoscopies, performed by six endoscopists with documented adenoma detection rates > 35 %, in four tertiary endoscopy facilities. Results We randomized 200 patients (mean age 61.2 years [standard deviation 9.8]; 86.5 % colorectal cancer screening surveillance cases). Overall, there were seven incomplete examinations using Endocuff and one with conventional colonoscopy (P = 0.03). Times for endoscope insertion (5.0 minutes [0.8 - 21.0] vs. 5.0 minutes [1.0 - 16.0]; P = 0.49) and withdrawal (6.0 minutes [3.2 - 29.0] vs. 6.0 minutes [3.1 - 17.0]; P = 0.06) were similar for Endocuff-assisted and conventional colonoscopy. We detected one cancer and 195 adenomas; 84 in the proximal colon. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy showed significantly lower overall and proximal colon adenoma miss rates compared with conventional colonoscopy (14.7 % [8.0 % - 21.0 %] vs. 38.4 % [28.1 % - 48.6 %] and 10.4 % [1.8 % - 19.1 %] vs. 38.9 % [23.0 % - 54.8 %], respectively). No difference between the two arms was shown regarding advanced adenoma miss rates, either overall or in the proximal colon. There were no serious adverse events related to the procedures. Conclusions In comparison with conventional colonoscopy, Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy has a significantly lower adenoma miss rate when performed by high-detector endoscopists. However, the incomplete colonoscopy rate with Endocuff is higher.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02340065. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28763808     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-114412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  9 in total

Review 1.  2017 Emily Couric Memorial Lecture: Colorectal Cancer: Polyps, Prevention, and Progress.

Authors:  Mark B Pochapin
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives.

Authors:  Hans-Dieter Allescher; Vincens Weingart
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 3.  The Role of Behind Folds Visualizing Techniques and Technologies in Improving Adenoma Detection Rate.

Authors:  K E van Keulen; E Soons; P D Siersema
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09

Review 4.  Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J Wang; C Ye; S Fei
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.699

5.  Proximal retroflexion versus second forward view of the right colon during screening colonoscopy: A multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ma Henar Núñez Rodríguez; Pilar Díez Redondo; Fausto Riu Pons; Marta Cimavilla; Luis Hernández; Andrea Loza; Manuel Pérez-Miranda
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Colonoscopy attachments for the detection of precancerous lesions during colonoscopy: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; Eleftherios Spartalis; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Lorenzo Fuccio; Cesare Hassan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Martin Buerger; Philipp Kasper; Gabriel Allo; Johannes Gillessen; Christoph Schramm
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  The impact of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection in an organized screening program.

Authors:  Lucas G Cavallaro; Cesare Hassan; Pierenrico Lecis; Ermenegildo Galliani; Elisabetta Dal Pont; Paolo Iuzzolino; Claudia Roldo; Fabio Soppelsa; Bastianello Germanà
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-03-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.