| Literature DB >> 28763453 |
Bernhard Klarner1, Helge Winkelmann1, Valentyna Krashevska1, Mark Maraun1, Rahayu Widyastuti2, Stefan Scheu1,3.
Abstract
Conversion of tropical rainforests into plantations fundamentally alters ecological niches of animal species. Generalist predators such asEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28763453 PMCID: PMC5538669 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of centipede species including full taxonomic name and authority, family affiliation, number of replicates (stable isotope ratios) and mean Δ13C and Δ15N values (± SD) (see text for details).
| Abbr. | Full name | Family | N | Δ13C | Δ15N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryp_sp | Cryptopidae | 14 | 4.71 ± 0.79 | 6.54 ± 1.79 | |
| Lam_sp | Henicopidae | 3 | 4.61 ± 1.05 | 5.67 ± 0.9 | |
| Mec_eni | Mecistocephalidae | 2 | 5.48 ± 0.98 | 7.65 ± 2.73 | |
| Mec_ste | Mecistocephalidae | 28 | 4.79 ± 1.18 | 7.62 ± 1.25 | |
| Mec_un | undetermined Mecistocephalidae | Mecistocephalidae | 0 | NA | NA |
| Mec_ver | Mecistocephalidae | 2 | 5.1 ± 0.52 | 9.41 ± 0.43 | |
| Par_sp | Cryptopidae | 0 | NA | NA | |
| Sche_sp | undetermined Schendylidae | Schendylidae | 3 | 2.82 ± 0.64 | 5.69 ± 0.75 |
| Scol_sp | undetermined Scolopendridae | Scolopendridae | 1 | 3.25 | 6.99 |
| Sun_bid | Geophilidae | 6 | 5.62 ± 1.15 | 7.72 ± 0.57 | |
| Sun_por | Geophilidae | 5 | 3.82 ± 0.76 | 9.14 ± 1.42 | |
| Tyg_jav | Mecistocephalidae | 1 | 4.32 | 5.66 |
Abbr., abbreviation used in figures; NA, not available.
Mean species number, abundance and biomass (± SD) of centipedes in different rainforest conversion systems.
| Conversion system | Species number | Abundance [ind. / m2] | Biomass [mg / m2] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rainforest | 3.13 ± 1.36 | 108.88 ± 74.5 | 31.62 ± 27.14 |
| Jungle rubber | 2.75 ± 1.49 | 78.00 ± 49.14 | 25.27 ± 33.67 |
| Rubber | 2.00 ± 1.20 | 40.63 ± 27.30 | 18.67 ± 32.68 |
| Oil palm | 2.25 ± 0.71 | 71.50 ± 37.42 | 20.74 ± 14.27 |
Fig 1Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) of centipede species in rainforest conversion systems of two study regions.
Different symbols indicate centroids of species (empty blue triangles, full names are given in Table 1), conversion systems (filled green triangles) and study regions (filled black diamonds). Environmental factors used as constraints (red arrows) were amount of litter in the litter layer and pH of litter. Axis 1 accounted for 10.1% and Axis 1 and 2 cumulatively accounted for 16.2% of the variability in species data (Pseudo F = 3.1, p = 0.04 and Pseudo F = 2.7, p = 0.01, for axis 1 and all axes, respectively).
Fig 2Mean (± SD) stable isotope values of centipede species.
Data are normalized to the value of plant litter of the respective sampling site. Dashed horizontal lines represent estimated trophic level boundaries based on the mean leaf litter δ15N value, primary decomposers were assumed to constitute the first trophic level with mean values of approximately 0.5‰ above those of leaf litter [71], each trophic level was assumed to span 3.4‰ [34,35,72]; II = secondary decomposers and first order predators, III = second order predators, IV = third order predators. Numbers in brackets indicate the number of replicates; for full species names see Table 1.
Fig 3Isotopic niches of centipedes as affected by land use.
Colored lines represent sample size corrected standard ellipse areas (SEAc [73]) of dual stable isotope values (δ13C, δ15N) of specimens collected in rainforest, jungle rubber, rubber and oil palm plantations using (a) the full set of measurements of 10 species (see also Table 1), (b) Cryptops sp. and (c) Mecistocephalus cf. stenoceps. Data are normalized to the values of plant litter collected at the respective sampling site.
ANOVA results from generalized linear mixed effects models testing the effect of forest conversion on stable isotope values of centipedes.
| Contrast | All data | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ13C | Δ15N | Δ13C | Δ15N | Δ13C | Δ15N | |
| F vs. J | F1, 22.9 = 1.07 | F1, 18.0 = 0.42 | F1, 9.5 = 2.59 | F1, 9.3 = 0.58 | F1, 16.7 = 0.21 | F1, 13.5 = 0.15 |
| F vs. R | F1, 25.9 = 0.15 | F1, 22.8 = 1.04 | F1, 10.5 = 1.4 | F1, 10.5 = 2.27 | F1, 17.3 = 0.01 | F1, 15.8 = 1.05 |
| F vs. O | F1, 20.4 = 2.56 | F1, 10.0 = 0.42 | F1, 17.0 = 2.95 | |||
| J vs. R | F1, 24.7 = 0.45 | F1, 20.8 = 0.15 | F1, 10.0 = 0.64 | F1, 10.1 = 0.21 | F1, 16.3 = 0.32 | F1, 4.9 = 3.00 |
| J vs. O | F1, 9.5 = 1.09 | F1, 9.5 = 1.09 | F1, 15.8 = 1.68 | |||
| R vs. O | F1, 9.7 = 3.52 | F1, 9.6 = 3.39 | ||||
Results are given for planned comparisons between conversion systems (F = rainforest, J = jungle rubber-, R = rubber- and O = oil palm plantations) using the full set of measurements of 10 species (see also Table 1), data of Cryptops sp. and Mecistocephalus cf. stenoceps. Data are normalized to the values of plant litter collected at the respective sampling site. Degrees of freedom given represent Satterthwaite approximations.
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.001.
Mean Δ13C and Δ15N values (means Δ SD) of centipedes in different rainforest conversion systems.
| Conversion system | all Chilopoda | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ13C | Δ15N | Δ13C | Δ15N | Δ13C | Δ15N | |
| Rainforest | 5.33 ± 1.02 | 7.41 ± 1.16 | 5.31 ± 0.74 | 7.80 ± 0.90 | 5.41 ± 0.61 | 6.49 ± 1.10 |
| Jungle rubber | 4.77 ± 0.69 | 7.96 ± 1.37 | 5.01 ± 0.66 | 7.35 ± 0.98 | 4.71 ± 0.40 | 7.38 ± 0.98 |
| Rubber | 5.42 ± 0.76 | 8.01 ± 1.83 | 5.62 ± 0.87 | 8.72 ± 1.22 | 4.98 ± 0.52 | 8.15 ± 2.91 |
| Oil palm | 3.50 ± 0.95 | 6.19 ± 1.44 | 3.57 ± 1.20 | 6.92 ± 1.30 | 3.88 ± 0.70 | 4.95 ± 1.69 |