Literature DB >> 28763362

Survival After Primary Debulking Surgery Compared With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A National Cancer Database Study.

Brandon-Luke L Seagle1, Stephen Graves, Anna E Strohl, Shohreh Shahabi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) of women with advanced ovarian cancer treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using a large national cohort.
METHODS: The 1998-2011 National Cancer Database was queried to identify women with stage III or IV ovarian cancer treated with multiagent chemotherapy and stage-appropriate surgery. Overall survival was estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis between women who received PDS followed by multiagent chemotherapy or NAC followed by interval surgery. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model tested for associations of potential explanatory variables with OS. Analyzed confounders included age, composite comorbidity scores, stage, grade, histology, insurance status, income quartile, and race.
RESULTS: Overall, 44,907 women (85.9%) underwent PDS, and 7348 women (14.1%) received NAC. Women who received NAC were older (64 vs 61 years, P < 0.001), had higher comorbidity scores (P < 0.001), and more often had stage IV disease (44.1% vs 26.1%, P < 0.001). Median OS was 41.1 (40.5-41.7) months among women who underwent PDS compared with 30.3 (29.3-31.1) months among women who received NAC (log-rank, P < 0.001). Among women with stage III disease, PDS was associated with increased OS compared with NAC (median OS, 44.9 [44.2-45.7] vs 31.4 [30.2-33.0] months; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.70 [0.66-0.76]; P < 0.001). Among women with stage IV disease, there was no OS difference between PDS and NAC cohorts (median OS, 31.2 [30.4-32.3] vs 28.4 [27.2-30.2] months; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.93 [0.85-1.02]; P = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Primary debulking surgery was associated with increased OS among women with stage III but not stage IV ovarian cancer in a nationally representative cohort with low NAC use. If this finding reflects treatment assignment bias, it suggests that providers often well select candidates for PDS rather than NAC, although median OS times remain low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28763362     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  4 in total

1.  Quality Indicators and Survival Outcome in Stage IIIB-IVB Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Inga Steinberga; Kjell Jansson; Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Factors associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Nicole D Fleming; Shannon N Westin; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Pamela T Soliman; Bryan M Fellman; Robert L Coleman; Larissa A Meyer; Aaron Shafer; Lauren P Cobb; Amir Jazaeri; Karen H Lu; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction.

Authors:  Mackenzie Cummings; Olivia Nicolais; Mark Shahin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Lv; Shihong Cui; Xiao'an Zhang; Chenchen Ren
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.401

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.