A tandem relay catalytic protocol using both Pd and isothiourea catalysis has been developed for the enantioselective synthesis of α-amino acid derivatives containing two stereogenic centers from readily accessible N,N-disubstituted glycine aryl esters and allylic phosphates. The optimized process uses a bench-stable succinimide-based Pd precatalyst (FurCat) to promote Pd-catalyzed allylic ammonium salt generation from the allylic phosphate and the glycine aryl ester. Subsequent in situ enantioselective [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement catalyzed by the isothiourea benzotetramisole forms syn-α-amino acid derivatives with high diastereo- and enantioselectivity. This methodology is most effective using 4-nitrophenylglycine esters and tolerates a variety of substituted cinnamic and styrenyl allylic ethyl phosphates. The use of challenging unsymmetrical N-allyl-N-methylglycine esters is also tolerated under the catalytic relay conditions without compromising stereoselectivity.
A tandem relay catalytic protocol using both Pd and isothiourea catalysis has been developed for the enantioselective synthesis of α-amino acid derivatives containing two stereogenic centers from readily accessible N,N-disubstituted glycine aryl esters and allylic phosphates. The optimized process uses a bench-stable succinimide-based Pd precatalyst (FurCat) to promote Pd-catalyzed allylic ammonium salt generation from the allylic phosphate and the glycine aryl ester. Subsequent in situ enantioselective [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement catalyzed by the isothiourea benzotetramisole forms syn-α-amino acid derivatives with high diastereo- and enantioselectivity. This methodology is most effective using 4-nitrophenylglycine esters and tolerates a variety of substituted cinnamic and styrenyl allylic ethyl phosphates. The use of challenging unsymmetrical N-allyl-N-methylglycine esters is also tolerated under the catalytic relay conditions without compromising stereoselectivity.
The
functionalization of α-amino acids through enantioselective
α-alkylation is an enduring challenge in synthetic chemistry.[1] For example, the direct stereoselective
transition-metal-catalyzed α-alkylation of amino acid ester
derivatives through allylic substitution has received considerable
attention.[2] In such processes, the use
of palladium-based catalysts typically results in formation of the
linear substitution product,[3,4] whereas catalysts based
on either molybdenum,[5] ruthenium,[6] rhodium,[7] or iridium[8] can be branched selective (Scheme a). In reactions with achiral allylic precursors
and prochiral amino acid enolates, product stereochemistry is
usually derived from either chiral ligands on the metal center, or
from the use of chiral enolate counterions. Alternatively, Snaddon
and co-workers reported that chiral ammonium enolates, derived from
the reaction of isothiourea catalyst BTM 1 with
aryl acetic esters, undergo enantioselective linear α-allylation
with achiral Pd-allyl complexes in a dual-catalytic process (Scheme b).[9] This methodology uses pentafluorophenyl arylacetic esters
as ammonium enolate precursors, demonstrating that an isothiourea/phenoxide-rebound
strategy for Lewis base catalyst turnover is compatible with Pd catalysis.
Hartwig and co-workers have reported a related enantioselective,
stereodivergent branched allylic substitution of aryl acetic
esters using synergistic Ir/isothiourea catalysis.[10,11]
Scheme 1
Direct α-Allylation of Ester Enolates
A conceptually different way of preparing branched α-allyl
α-amino acid derivatives has been reported by Tambar and co-workers
(Scheme a).[12] The process uses a Pd-catalyzed linear allylic
amination reaction between allylic carbonates 2 and glycine
esters 3 to generate quaternary allylic ammonium salts
in situ, which undergo stoichiometric Brønsted base-promoted
[2,3]-rearrangement to form racemic anti-α-amino
acid derivatives 4 with high diastereoselectivity.
Scheme 2
Catalytic [2,3]-Rearrangements of Allylic Ammonium Ylides
However, despite the synthetic
potential, the development of enantioselective
[2,3]-rearrangements of allylic ammonium ylides for the synthesis
of α-amino acid derivatives has remained a significant challenge.[13,14] Previous strategies toward such processes have traditionally relied
on substrate control and/or the use of chiral auxiliaries.[15] Alternatively, Somfai and co-workers reported
the use of a stoichiometric chiral Lewis acid for the enantioselective
synthesis of α-amino amide derivatives.[16] In 2014, we reported the first catalytic enantioselective
[2,3]-rearrangement of allylic quaternary ammonium salts 5 using the isothiourea BTM 1 as a Lewis base and
co-catalytic hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt) to form syn-α-amino acid derivatives 6 with excellent stereoselectivity
(Scheme b).[17] In this process the HOBt additive (i) aids catalyst
turnover through interception of a post-[2,3]-rearrangement acylammonium
species and (ii) leads to increased diastereo- and enantioselectivity
of the [2,3]-rearrangement products.[18] A
recognized challenge encountered by ourselves and others[19] for such [2,3]-rearrangement processes is the
problematic synthesis and isolation of the required allylic quaternary
ammonium salts. In our case,[17] only limited
ammonium salts were amenable to isolation, typically being obtained
in moderate yields (ca. 30–90%) from the corresponding
allylic amine and 4-nitrophenyl bromoacetate. Although an in situ
one-pot salt-formation/[2,3]-rearrangement protocol was developed,
the products were formed in moderate overall yields and with reduced
enantioselectivity compared with the use of the isolated salts.Building upon the precedent of Tambar, we questioned the feasibility
of merging a Pd-catalyzed allylic amination with an enantioselective
isothiourea-catalyzed [2,3]-rearrangement (Scheme c). Such a process would allow
for the rapid generation of complex enantiomerically enriched α-amino
acids 7 bearing two new stereocenters from readily
available allylic alcohol derivatives and glycine esters, avoiding
the problematic isolation of ammonium salts. To proceed effectively,
this relay catalytic system must overcome the inherent challenges
associated with combining transition metal and organo-catalyzed processes,[20,21] with all reactants compatible with each independent catalytic cycle.
Notably, the inherent substrate bias for [2,3]-rearrangement under
the basic Pd-catalyzed conditions developed by Tambar generates anti-α-amino acid derivatives 4,[12] whereas the isothiourea-catalyzed process
forms the opposite syn-diastereoisomer 6. The proposed relay system must therefore undergo minimal
Brønsted base-catalyzed [2,3]-rearrangement (anti-selective) to allow the desired products from the tandem isothiourea-catalyzed
pathway to be formed with high syn-diastereoselectivity.
The desired process must also be tolerant of glycine derivatives bearing
labile phenol esters that are required both for initiation of the
Lewis base-catalyzed process and to generate the phenoxide necessary
to facilitate catalyst turnover.[22] The
nucleophilic isothiourea catalyst[23] and generated phenoxide must also not interfere with, or inhibit,
the Pd-catalyzed allylic substitution process.[24]In this context, this manuscript documents the merger
of transition
metal and Lewis base catalysis for an unprecedented tandem relay catalytic
allylic amination followed by enantioselective [2,3]-rearrangement.
The methodology uses a bench-stable succinimide-based Pd precatalyst
(FurCat) to promote allylic substitution and an isothiourea
catalyst to perform the enantioselective [2,3]-rearrangement,
forming functionalized α-amino acid derivatives in good yields
with high stereoselectivity. The scope and limitations of this
new process have been fully explored, including the use of unsymmetrical N,N-disubstituted glycine esters. The utility
of the products has been demonstrated through various derivatizations,
while crossover and control experiments are used to probe the mechanism
of the allylic amination step.
Results and Discussion
Reaction Optimization
Identification of a Suitable
Allylic Precursor
To achieve high levels of diastereo- and
enantioselectivity
during the proposed relay catalysis, it is imperative that any base-promoted
[2,3]-rearrangement of the in situ-generated allylic ammonium salt
into racemic product is minimized. We hypothesized that the counterion
generated from Pd-promoted allylic ammonium salt formation could play
a key role in this area. With this in mind, a series of control experiments
based upon Tambar’s original report[12] was performed to identify a suitable allylic precursor for the proposed
relay catalysis (Table ). First, N,N-dimethylglycine
ethyl ester 8 was reacted with cinnamyl ethyl carbonate 9 in the presence of Pd(dba)2 (2 mol%) and PPh3 (4 mol%) using excess Cs2CO3 as base
(Table , entry 1).
This gave [2,3]-rearrangement product 12 in good 88%
yield and a 65:35 dr in favor of the anti-diastereoisomer,
consistent with the literature for such base-mediated processes.[12] In the absence of Cs2CO3 the reaction still proceeded to give product 12 in
75% yield (Table ,
entry 2). This suggests that the ethyl carbonate and/or ethoxide released
during allylic substitution is sufficiently basic to promote the [2,3]-rearrangement
step, and that ethyl carbonates are not suitable precursors for a
catalytic enantioselective relay process. To reduce the basicity
of the released counterion, cinnamyl phenyl carbonate 10 was investigated; however, this did not lead to product formation
in either the presence or absence of external base with the starting
materials mostly returned in both cases (Table , entries 3 and 4).[25] Next, cinnamyl ethyl phosphate 11 was tested and, as
required, only led to product formation in the presence of external
base (Table , entries
5 and 6), consistent with no phosphate-mediated [2,3]-rearrangement
under these conditions.
Table 1
Identifying Suitable
Allylic Precursors
entry
X
Cs2CO3
yield (%)
dra
1
C(O)OEt (9)
3 equiv
88
65:35
2
C(O)OEt (9)
–
75
68:32
3
C(O)OPh (10)
3 equiv
0
N/A
4
C(O)OPh (10)
–
0
N/A
5
P(O)(OEt)2 (11)
3 equiv
80
66:34
6
P(O)(OEt)2 (11)
–
0
N/A
Determined by 1H NMR
analysis of the crude material.
Determined by 1H NMR
analysis of the crude material.
Development of Pd/Isothiourea Relay
Catalysis
Having identified easily accessible allylic phosphates[25] as potentially suitable precursors, efforts
were focused on developing a catalytic enantioselective relay
allylic substitution/[2,3]-rearrangement process (Table ). Readily accessible N,N-dimethyl 4-nitrophenyl ester hydrochloride
salt 13 was chosen as a suitable glycine derivative that
would allow for Lewis base incorporation, while the released 4-nitrophenoxide
should also be capable of facilitating catalyst turnover. However,
initial attempts at reacting 13 and cinnamyl ethyl phosphate 11 with Pd(dba)2 (2 mol%) and PPh3 (4
mol%) in the presence of the isothiourea BTM 1 (20
mol%) using i-Pr2NH as base in MeCN at
room temperature led to <5% product formation (Table , entry 1). The use of electron-withdrawing
heteroaryl phosphines 15 and 16 gave the
first sign of the desired reactivity,[26] giving [2,3]-rearrangement product 14 in low conversion
by 1H NMR (Table , entries 2 and 3). Altering the source of palladium led to
significant improvements in reactivity. Using Pd2(dba)3·CHCl3 (1 mol%) and P(2-furyl)3 (4 mol%) allowed product 14 to be isolated in 47% yield
and 95:5 dr (Table , entry 4), while using [Pd(allyl)Cl]217 (1 mol%) under the same conditions gave 14 in 70% yield
as a single diastereoisomer (Table , entry 5). In these cases, the syn-configured diastereoisomer is favored and was formed with
excellent enantioselectivity (up to >99:1 er),[27] providing proof-of-principle for the desired
catalytic
relay process. The high stereoselectivity observed is consistent
with competitive racemic [2,3]-rearrangement processes having been
completely suppressed without recourse to the addition of additives
such as HOBt.[17,18] The use of the defined, bench-stable
succinimide-based Pd complex 18 (FurCat, 5 mol%), first
developed by Fairlamb and co-workers for use in Stille cross-coupling[28] gave further improvement while simplifying the
catalytic system, allowing syn-14 to
be isolated in 79% yield as a single diastereoisomer in 99:1
er (Table , entry
6). Decreasing the catalyst loading of BTM 1 led to reduced
yields and stereoselectivity (Table , entries 7 and 8). Control experiments in
the absence of either the Pd catalyst 18 or BTM 1 led to no product formation under the otherwise optimal
conditions (Table , entries 9 and 10). Alternatively the free base of 4-nitrophenyl
ester 13 and i-Pr2NH (1.2 equiv) can be used in this protocol, giving syn-14 in reduced 58% yield, 92:8 dr and 97:3 er (Table , entry 11).[29] Screening alternative N,N-dimethylglycine aryl esters under the optimized
conditions showed that the 3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenyl ester gave
good conversion into the corresponding rearrangement product with
high stereoselectivity (Table , entry 12). However, use of either 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl,
2,3,5,6-tetrafluorophenyl, or pentafluorophenyl esters resulted in
low conversions into the respective products.[25] This contrasts the findings of both Snaddon[9] and Hartwig,[10] who showed that pentafluorophenyl
arylacetic esters were optimal in their enantioselective α-allylation
protocols using isothioureas in combination with either Pd or
Ir catalysis, respectively. To further probe the effect of the allylic
leaving group a range of alternative cinnamyl alcohol derivatives
was also tested under the previously optimized conditions. While both
cinnamyl acetate and cinnamyl methyl carbonate gave poor conversion
into product 14,[25] use of
cinnamyl trifluoroacetate gave 14 in good yield with
high stereoselectivity (Table , entry 13).
Table 2
Optimization of the
Enantioselective
Relay Process
entry
[Pd] (mol%)
L
1 (mol%)
yield (%)a
drb
erc
1
Pd(dba)2 (2)
PPh3
20
(<5)
N/A
N/A
2
Pd(dba)2 (2)
15
20
(11)
N/D
N/D
3
Pd(dba)2 (2)
16
20
(13)
N/D
N/D
4
Pd2(dba)3·CHCl3 (1)
16
20
47
95:5
98:2
5
17 (1)
16
20
70
>95:5
>99:1
6
18 (5)
–
20
79
>95:5
99:1
7
18 (5)
–
10
60
94:6
97:3
8
18 (5)
–
5
56
88:12
89:11
9
18 (5)
–
–
0
N/A
N/A
10
–
–
20
0
N/A
N/A
11d
18 (5)
–
20
58
92:8
97:3
12e
18 (5)
–
20
65
>95:5
>99:1
13f
18 (5)
–
20
60
>95:5
96:4
Yields in parentheses determined
by 1H NMR using 1,4-dinitrobenzene as an internal standard.
Determined by 1H
NMR
analysis of the crude material.
Determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.
Free base of 13 and i-Pr2NH (1.2 equiv) used in place of 13·HCl and i-Pr2NH (2.2 equiv).
N,N-Dimethyl-3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenylglycine
ester used in place of 13.
Cinnamyl trifluoroacetate (2 equiv)
used in place of 11.
Yields in parentheses determined
by 1H NMR using 1,4-dinitrobenzene as an internal standard.Determined by 1H
NMR
analysis of the crude material.Determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.Free base of 13 and i-Pr2NH (1.2 equiv) used in place of 13·HCl and i-Pr2NH (2.2 equiv).N,N-Dimethyl-3,5-bis-trifluoromethylphenylglycine
ester used in place of 13.Cinnamyl trifluoroacetate (2 equiv)
used in place of 11.
Scope and Limitations of
Pd/Isothiourea
Relay Catalysis
Variation of the Allylic
Phosphate
The scope of this process was next assessed through
variation of
the cinnamic aryl substituent within the allylic phosphate component
(Table ). Aryl rings
bearing electron-withdrawing substituents (4-NO2 and 4-CF3) were well tolerated, forming rearranged products 19 and 20 in high yield with excellent stereoselectivity
(up to >95:5 dr and 97:3 er). Halogen-substituted aryl rings, including
sterically demanding 2-BrC6H4 substitution,
were also well tolerated, forming 21–23 as single diastereoisomers with high enantioselectivity
(up to 99:1 er). The reaction of the allylic phosphate bearing a 4-BrC6H4 substituent was also performed on a preparative
laboratory scale (3.8 mmol) to give 1.5 g of 22 as a
single stereoisomer in 91% yield. The presence of a 3-MeOC6H4 substituent led to a slight reduction in diastereoselectivity
(91:9 dr), but the major product 24 was still obtained
in high 99:1 er. The methodology was also applicable to allylic phosphates
bearing oxygenated aryl rings that can be synthesized from the three
monolignols, 4-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol,
which are the building blocks of lignin biopolymers.[30] The relay catalysis allowed amino acid derivatives 25–27 to be isolated in good yields with
excellent stereoselectivity (up to >95:5 dr and 99:1 er),
demonstrating
that complex enantiomerically pure products can be expediently accessed
from renewable lignin resources. Alkenyl and heteroaromatic substituents
could also be tolerated, forming 28 and 29 in slightly reduced yields but with excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivity.
Notably, the yields and stereoselectivity of this relay Pd/isothiourea
catalysis generally exceed those obtained from the previously reported
isothiourea-catalyzed [2,3]-rearrangement of isolated allylic
ammonium salts.[17] The reactions of non-aryl-substituted
allyl phosphate with 13 under the standard relay conditions
gave no [2,3]-rearrangement products, with the major product obtained
being the corresponding aryl ether formed from allylic substitution
with 4-nitrophenoxide.[25]
Table 3
Scope of Allylic Ethyl Phosphatesa,b,c
Reactions performed on a 0.5 mmol
scale.
dr determined by 1H NMR
analysis of the crude material.
er determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.
Reaction performed on a 3.8 mmol
scale.
Reactions performed on a 0.5 mmol
scale.dr determined by 1H NMR
analysis of the crude material.er determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.Reaction performed on a 3.8 mmol
scale.The presence of a
4-nitrophenyl ester within the [2,3]-rearrangement
products allows facile derivatization into a range of α-amino
acid derivatives through reaction with suitable nucleophiles (Scheme ). For example,
reacting isolated 22 (>95:5 dr, >99:1 er) with
either
primary or secondary amines gave the corresponding amides 30 and 31 in high yields with no erosion of stereointegrity.
Transesterification with methoxide provided α-amino ester 32 in 93% yield as a single diastereoisomer in 97:3
er. The corresponding α-amino acid 33 could be
readily obtained as its hydrochloride salt upon hydrolysis, while
reduction with LiAlH4 provided enantiomerically pure amino
alcohol 34 in excellent yield.[31]
Scheme 3
Product Derivatizations,,
Reaction
conditions: (i) BnNH2 (5.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt, 16 h; (ii)
pyrrolidine (5.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt, 16 h; (iii)
NaOMe (1.5 equiv), MeOH, 0 °C to rt, 1 h; (iv) H2O/HCl,
110 °C, 16 h; (v) LiAlH4 (1.5 equiv), THF, 0 °C
to rt, 1 h.
dr determined
by 1H NMR analysis of the crude material.
er determined by HPLC analysis.
er determined after derivatization
into the corresponding benzyl amide.
Product Derivatizations,,
Reaction
conditions: (i) BnNH2 (5.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt, 16 h; (ii)
pyrrolidine (5.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt, 16 h; (iii)
NaOMe (1.5 equiv), MeOH, 0 °C to rt, 1 h; (iv) H2O/HCl,
110 °C, 16 h; (v) LiAlH4 (1.5 equiv), THF, 0 °C
to rt, 1 h.dr determined
by 1H NMR analysis of the crude material.er determined by HPLC analysis.er determined after derivatization
into the corresponding benzyl amide.
Variation of the Glycine Ester N-Substituents
Next, variation of the N-substituents
within the glycine ester was investigated in the Pd/isothiourea
relay catalysis (Table ). Cyclic N-pyrrolidinyl substitution was tolerated
under the previously optimized conditions, forming 35 in 75% yield as a single stereoisomer. However, increasing
the ring size to either N-piperidinyl or N-azepanyl resulted in lower yields (33% for 36 and 38% for 37) and reduced diastereoselectivity
(75:25 dr and 73:27 dr, respectively) under the standard reaction
conditions. Increasing the Pd catalyst loading to 10 mol% gave products 36 and 37 in improved yields, and although these
reactions again proceeded with lower diastereoselectivity (88:12
and 80:20 dr, respectively), the enantioselectivity of the major syn-diastereoisomer remained high (>98:2 er). Limitations
of the relay process include the use of N-morpholinylglycine
ester 38, which was unreactive under both the standard
reaction conditions and with an increased 10 mol% loading of FurCat 18. The use of glycine esters bearing symmetrical N,N-dialkyl substituents such as N,N-dibenzylglycine ester 39 and N,N-diallylglycine ester 40 was also
unsuccessful, with unreacted starting materials returned in both cases.
Table 4
Use of Symmetrical N,N-Dialkylglycine
Estersa,b,c
Reactions performed
on a 0.5 mmol
scale.
dr determined by 1H NMR
analysis of the crude material.
er determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.
Reaction performed using 5 mol%
FurCat 18.
Reaction performed using i-Pr2NH (1.2
equiv).
Reactions performed
on a 0.5 mmol
scale.dr determined by 1H NMR
analysis of the crude material.er determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.Reaction performed using 5 mol%
FurCat 18.Reaction performed using i-Pr2NH (1.2
equiv).Previous studies
found that isolated allylic quaternary ammonium
salts bearing N,N-diallyl substituents undergo isothiourea-catalyzed
[2,3]-rearrangement,[32] therefore it is
likely that this represents a limitation within the Pd-catalyzed allylic
substitution step in the relay procedure using 40. The
use of unsymmetrical N-allyl-N-methylglycine
ester 41 was then studied in the Pd/isothiourea
relay catalysis (Table ).[33] Such a substrate is particularly
challenging as the proposed Pd-catalyzed allylic substitution would
lead to an intermediate ammonium salt 42 containing a
stereogenic nitrogen atom, which may impact upon the stereoselectivity
of the subsequent [2,3]-rearrangement. Furthermore, there is the potential
for rearrangement via either the N-cinnamyl or N-allyl substituent in this case. Initial investigations
found that the Pd/isothiourea relay [2,3]-rearrangement of 41 required 10 mol% of Pd precatalyst 18 for
good conversion into product. Exclusive [2,3]-rearrangement through
the N-cinnamyl substituent gave α-amino ester 43 in 40% yield with excellent stereoselectivity (95:5
dr, 99:1 er). The high chemoselectivity of this process is in
contrast to the observations of Tambar and co-workers, who reported
an 80:20 mixture of N-cinnamyl versus N-allyl rearrangement for the base-promoted reaction of an ammonium
salt generated from N-allyl-N-methylglycine tert-butyl ester and cinnamyl carbonate.[12a] The relay reaction of 41 was further explored
through variation of the allylic ethyl phosphate. The use of allylic
phosphates bearing electron-withdrawing aryl substituents (4-NO2C6H4 and 4-CF3C6H4) led to improved reactivity, forming products 44 and 45 in higher yields (63% and 64%, respectively),
while maintaining excellent stereoselectivity. Conversely, the
presence of oxygenated aryl substituents led to decreased yields of 46 and 47, although stereoselectivity remained
high. The relative and absolute configurations of the products from
this series were confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis of the
benzyl amide of 47.[34]
Table 5
Use of Unsymmetrical N,N-Dialkylglycine
Estersa
Reactions performed
on a 0.5 mmol
scale.
dr determined by 1H NMR
analysis of the crude material.
er determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.
dr of isolated material.
Reactions performed
on a 0.5 mmol
scale.dr determined by 1H NMR
analysis of the crude material.er determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.dr of isolated material.The presence of the N-allyl substituent within
the products allowed for further derivatization of 45 into a stereodefined piperidine (Scheme ). Facile methanolysis of 45 generated N-allyl-N-methyl amino
ester 48, which undergoes catalytic ring-closing metathesis
in the presence of Hoveyda–Grubbs II (5 mol%) followed by Pd/C-catalyzed
hydrogenation to form substituted piperidine 49 in 89%
yield (over two steps) as a single diastereoisomer in 97:3 er.
Scheme 4
Product Derivatization,
dr determined by 1H
NMR analysis of the crude material.
er determined by HPLC analysis.
Product Derivatization,
dr determined by 1H
NMR analysis of the crude material.er determined by HPLC analysis.
Mechanistic Control Experiments
The
relay protocol is thought to proceed via a Pd-catalyzed allylic substitution
of an allylic phosphate with a glycine ester to form an intermediate
allylic ammonium salt, which undergoes an enantioselective isothiourea-catalyzed
[2,3]-rearrangement to give the observed α-amino ester products.
Having previously reported detailed investigations into the mechanism
of the isothiourea-catalyzed [2,3]-rearrangement of isolated
allylic ammonium salts,[18] control experiments
were performed to probe the Pd-catalyzed allylic substitution step
within this relay methodology.[12,35] The reaction of branched
cinnamyl phosphate 50 with glycine ester 13 under the standard reaction conditions gave rearranged product 14 (Scheme a), albeit in slightly reduced yield (49%) and lower diastereoselectivity
(93:7 dr, 99:1 er) compared with the use of linear cinnamyl phosphate 11 (79%, >95:5 dr, 99:1 er).[36] This
suggests that the proposed Pd-π-allyl intermediate preferentially
reacts at the least sterically hindered terminal position to give
the required ammonium salt for [2,3]-rearrangement.[3,37] Reacting
(Z)-cinnamyl phosphate 51 (86:14 Z:E) with glycine ester 13 under the relay conditions led to the formation of the same syn-diastereoisomer of 14 (>95:5 dr
and
99:1 er) in 74% yield (Scheme a), which is comparable to the result obtained starting from
(E)-11. As (Z)-cinnamylammonium
salts formed in situ are only poorly reactive in the isothiourea-catalyzed
[2,3]-rearrangement,[17a] this suggests that
η3-Pd-π-allyl complex 56 formed
from (Z)-51 undergoes π–σ–π
isomerization into the more favorable η3-Pd-π-allyl
complex 55 prior to ammonium salt formation and [2,3]-rearrangement.[38] Further analysis of the 1H NMR spectrum
of the crude material showed that the Z/E ratio of the unreacted allylic phosphate 51 had not
changed, while a control experiment reacting (Z)-51 with only FurCat 18 also showed no isomerization
into (E)-11. This demonstrates that
isomerization of (Z)-51 is unlikely
to occur prior to the initial oxidative addition.
dr determined
by 1H NMR analysis of the crude material.
er determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.
Product ratio determined by 19F{1H} NMR analysis.
Mechanistic Control
Experiments,,
Reaction conditions: (i) allylic
phosphate (2 equiv), FurCat 18 (5 mol%), BTM 1 (20 mol%), i-Pr2NH (2.2 equiv), MeCN,
rt, 16 h.dr determined
by 1H NMR analysis of the crude material.er determined by HPLC analysis after
derivatization into the corresponding benzyl amide.Product ratio determined by 19F{1H} NMR analysis.Next, a 50:50
mixture of isolated allylic ammonium salt 53 and N-pyrrolidinylglycine ester 52 was reacted
under the relay catalysis conditions (Scheme b). The major product obtained
was from the expected [2,3]-rearrangement of 53 into 21; however, small amounts of crossover rearrangement product 54 were also observed (91:9 21:54). In the absence of FurCat 18, no crossover product 54 was obtained, suggesting that 53 is a suitable
substrate for Pd-π-allyl complex formation and that allylic
ammonium salt formation is at least partially reversible under the
reaction conditions.The proposed overall relay catalytic cycle
for the reaction of
cinnamyl phosphate 11 with glycine ester 13 is depicted in Scheme . The active Pd catalyst is generated in situ from FurCat 18,[28] although the specific ligands associated
with the Pd species and its oxidation state have not been determined.
Coordination, followed by oxidative addition into allylic phosphate 11, generates η3-Pd-π-allyl complex 55. Nucleophilic attack of free-base glycine ester 57 reversibly generates coordinated ammonium salt 58,
which can dissociate to form the key allylic ammonium salt 59 that links the two tandem catalytic cycles. Acylation of the isothiourea
BTM 1 with 59 forms dication 60,[39] with subsequent deprotonation into
ammonium ylide 61 using 4-nitrophenoxide (PNPO–). Stereoselective [2,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement affords
acylammonium 63, which reacts with PNPO– to affect isothiourea turnover and release product 14. The observed diastereo- and enantioselectivity can be rationalized
by the [2,3]-rearrangement proceeding via endo-TS 62.[18] Ammonium ylide 61 is thought to have significant enolate character, favoring a (Z)-conformation that is further stabilized by a nonbonding
1,5-S···O interaction resulting from nO to
σ*C–S overlap between the carbonyl and the
isothiourea sulfur atom.[40−42] Rearrangement occurs on the face
opposite to the stereodirecting phenyl substituent on the catalyst,
with an endo-conformation preferred due to a π-cation
interaction between the cinnamyl substituent and the isothiourea
core. The presence of this favorable interaction may account for the
selective rearrangement through the N-cinnamyl substituent
over the unsubstituted N-allyl terminus in the reaction
of unsymmetrical N,N-dialkylglycine
esters.
Scheme 6
Proposed Relay Catalytic Mechanism
Conclusions
In conclusion, a tandem
Pd/isothiourea relay catalysis has
been developed for the synthesis of functionalized α-amino acid
derivatives from readily available glycine ester derivatives and allylic
phosphates. The process is thought to proceed via Pd-catalyzed allylic
ammonium salt formation followed by an isothiourea-catalyzed
enantioselective [2,3]-rearrangement reaction to form the α-amino
acid products with high levels of stereoselectivity. The methodology
works for a range of substrates, including unsymmetrical N-allyl-N-methylglycine derivatives that would
contain a stereogenic nitrogen atom in the intermediate ammonium
salt. The α-amino acid products undergo a series of derivatization
reactions to further demonstrate the synthetic utility of this process.
Ongoing studies within this laboratory are aimed at developing further
catalytic, enantioselective rearrangement processes.
Authors: James A Workman; Neil P Garrido; Julien Sançon; Edward Roberts; Hans Peter Wessel; J B Sweeney Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2005-02-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Emily R T Robinson; Daniel M Walden; Charlene Fallan; Mark D Greenhalgh; Paul Ha-Yeon Cheong; Andrew D Smith Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Kevin J Schwarz; Colin M Pearson; Gabriel A Cintron-Rosado; Peng Liu; Thomas N Snaddon Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Jacqueline Bitai; Alastair J Nimmo; Alexandra M Z Slawin; Andrew D Smith Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 16.823