Q Liu1, J Tang1,2,3, X Liu1, B Song1, M Zhen1, N J Ashbolt4. 1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria (Ministry of Education), Tianjin, China. 3. Tianjin Engineering Center of Environmental Diagnosis and Contamination Remediation, Tianjin, China. 4. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Abstract
AIMS: Study the response of microbial communities and selected petroleum hydrocarbon (PH)-degrading genes on simulated PH spills in soils/sediments from different geographic locations. METHODS AND RESULTS: A microcosm experiment was conducted by spiking mixtures of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs) to soils/sediments collected from four different regions of China, including the Dagang Oilfield (DG), Sand of Bohai Sea (SS), Northeast China (NE) and Xiamen (XM). Changes in bacterial community and the abundance of PH-degrading genes (alkB, nah and phe) were analysed by denaturing gradient electrophoresis (DGGE) and qPCR, respectively. Degradation of alkanes and PAHs in SS and NE materials were greater (P < 0·05) than those in DG and XM. Clay content was negatively correlated with the degradation of total alkanes by 112 days and PAHs by 56 days, while total organic carbon content was negatively correlated with initial degradation of total alkanes as well as PAHs. Abundances of alkB, nah and phe genes increased 10- to 100-fold and varied by soil type over the incubation period. DGGE fingerprints identified the dominance of α-, β- and γ-Proteobacteria (Gram -ve) and Actinobacteria (Gram +ve) bacteria associated with degradation of PHs in the materials studied. CONCLUSION: The geographic divergence resulting from the heterogeneity of physicochemical properties of soils/sediments appeared to influence the abundance of metabolic genes and community structure of microbes capable of degrading PHs. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: When developing practical in-situ bioremediation approaches for PHs contamination of soils/sediment, appropriate microbial community structures and the abundance of PH-degrading genes appear to be influenced by geographic location.
AIMS: Study the response of microbial communities and selected petroleum hydrocarbon (PH)-degrading genes on simulated PH spills in soils/sediments from different geographic locations. METHODS AND RESULTS: A microcosm experiment was conducted by spiking mixtures of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs) to soils/sediments collected from four different regions of China, including the Dagang Oilfield (DG), Sand of Bohai Sea (SS), Northeast China (NE) and Xiamen (XM). Changes in bacterial community and the abundance of PH-degrading genes (alkB, nah and phe) were analysed by denaturing gradient electrophoresis (DGGE) and qPCR, respectively. Degradation of alkanes and PAHs in SS and NE materials were greater (P < 0·05) than those in DG and XM. Clay content was negatively correlated with the degradation of total alkanes by 112 days and PAHs by 56 days, while total organic carbon content was negatively correlated with initial degradation of total alkanes as well as PAHs. Abundances of alkB, nah and phe genes increased 10- to 100-fold and varied by soil type over the incubation period. DGGE fingerprints identified the dominance of α-, β- and γ-Proteobacteria (Gram -ve) and Actinobacteria (Gram +ve) bacteria associated with degradation of PHs in the materials studied. CONCLUSION: The geographic divergence resulting from the heterogeneity of physicochemical properties of soils/sediments appeared to influence the abundance of metabolic genes and community structure of microbes capable of degrading PHs. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: When developing practical in-situ bioremediation approaches for PHs contamination of soils/sediment, appropriate microbial community structures and the abundance of PH-degrading genes appear to be influenced by geographic location.
Authors: Bo Tan; Fan Yang; Liying Lan; Chengming You; Jian Zhang; Zhenfeng Xu; Yang Liu; Li Zhang; Han Li Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E N Melekhina; E S Belykh; M Yu Markarova; A A Taskaeva; E E Rasova; O A Baturina; M R Kabilov; I O Velegzhaninov Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Lloyd D Potts; Alex Douglas; Luis J Perez Calderon; James A Anderson; Ursula Witte; James I Prosser; Cécile Gubry-Rangin Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 9.028