Kamonwan Tangvoraphonkchai1, Anne Riddell2, Andrew Davenport3. 1. Department of Renal Medicine, Mahasarakham University Hospital, Mahasarakham, Thailand. 2. Haemophilia Centre & Thrombosis Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG. 3. UCL Centre for Nephrology, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis patients are pro-thrombotic. Higher volume online postdilutional hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF), with increasing hematocrit increases the risk of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit (ECC). We wished to determine whether OL-HDF increased platelet activation and ECC clotting. METHODS: Coagulation parameters, platelet, white cell, and endothelial activation markers were measured at the start and end of dialysis sessions in 10 patients and also pre- and post-dialyzer after 15 minutes using two different dialyzers designed for high volume OL-HDF; cellulose triacetate (TAGP) and polysulphone (PS), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). Patients were anticoagulated with a heparin bolus. FINDINGS: At the start of OL-HDF, D dimers, thrombin antithrombin complexes (TATs), and soluble adhesions molecules (sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1) were increased. Post-treatment soluble P selectin (PS/PVP 26.7 ± 7.1 versus 36.6 ± 9.9; TAGP 28.7 ± 7.2 versus 43.5 ± 8.4 ng/ml, P < 0.001), and soluble CD40 ligand (PS/PVP 297 ± 228 versus 552 ± 272, TAGP 245 ± 187 versus 390 ± 205 ng/ml, P < 0.05) increased. Post-dialyzer concentrations increased versus pre-dialyzer for tissue factor (PS/PVP 117 ± 12 versus 136 ± 16, TAGP 100 ± 25 versus 128 ± 40 ng/ml, P < 0.05), factor VIIIc (PS/PVP 174 ± 54 versus 237 ± 83, TAGP 163 ± 60 versus 247 ± 102 IU/ml, P < 0.01), sVCAM-1 (PS/PVP 782 ± 64 versus 918 ± 140, TAGP 722 ± 121 versus 889 ± 168 ng/ml, P < 0.01), and D-dimers (PS/PVP 292 ± 132 versus 355 ± 167, TAGP 300 ± 129 versus 391 ± 171 ng/ml, P < 0.001). There was no macroscopic thrombus noted in the ECC, and no increase in microparticles, platelet factor-4, or TATs. DISCUSSION: Despite being pro-thrombotic, with activation of platelets, and lymphocytes during passage through ECC, no macroscopic clotting, or increased TATs were noted during OL-HDF, and no major differences between cellulosic and polysulphone dialyzers.
INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis patients are pro-thrombotic. Higher volume online postdilutional hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF), with increasing hematocrit increases the risk of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit (ECC). We wished to determine whether OL-HDF increased platelet activation and ECC clotting. METHODS: Coagulation parameters, platelet, white cell, and endothelial activation markers were measured at the start and end of dialysis sessions in 10 patients and also pre- and post-dialyzer after 15 minutes using two different dialyzers designed for high volume OL-HDF; cellulose triacetate (TAGP) and polysulphone (PS), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). Patients were anticoagulated with a heparin bolus. FINDINGS: At the start of OL-HDF, D dimers, thrombin antithrombin complexes (TATs), and soluble adhesions molecules (sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1) were increased. Post-treatment soluble P selectin (PS/PVP 26.7 ± 7.1 versus 36.6 ± 9.9; TAGP 28.7 ± 7.2 versus 43.5 ± 8.4 ng/ml, P < 0.001), and soluble CD40 ligand (PS/PVP 297 ± 228 versus 552 ± 272, TAGP 245 ± 187 versus 390 ± 205 ng/ml, P < 0.05) increased. Post-dialyzer concentrations increased versus pre-dialyzer for tissue factor (PS/PVP 117 ± 12 versus 136 ± 16, TAGP 100 ± 25 versus 128 ± 40 ng/ml, P < 0.05), factor VIIIc (PS/PVP 174 ± 54 versus 237 ± 83, TAGP 163 ± 60 versus 247 ± 102 IU/ml, P < 0.01), sVCAM-1 (PS/PVP 782 ± 64 versus 918 ± 140, TAGP 722 ± 121 versus 889 ± 168 ng/ml, P < 0.01), and D-dimers (PS/PVP 292 ± 132 versus 355 ± 167, TAGP 300 ± 129 versus 391 ± 171 ng/ml, P < 0.001). There was no macroscopic thrombus noted in the ECC, and no increase in microparticles, platelet factor-4, or TATs. DISCUSSION: Despite being pro-thrombotic, with activation of platelets, and lymphocytes during passage through ECC, no macroscopic clotting, or increased TATs were noted during OL-HDF, and no major differences between cellulosic and polysulphone dialyzers.
Authors: Nishank Jain; Adam Corken; Amudha Kumar; Clayton Davis; Jerry Ware; John Arthur Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 14.978
Authors: Karlien François; Christelle Orlando; Kristin Jochmans; Wilfried Cools; Vicky De Meyer; Christian Tielemans; Karl Martin Wissing Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2020-03-13