Literature DB >> 28762605

Ensemblator v3: Robust atom-level comparative analyses and classification of protein structure ensembles.

Andrew E Brereton1, P Andrew Karplus1.   

Abstract

Ensembles of protein structures are increasingly used to represent the conformational variation of a protein as determined by experiment and/or by molecular simulations, as well as uncertainties that may be associated with structure determinations or predictions. Making the best use of such information requires the ability to quantitatively compare entire ensembles. For this reason, we recently introduced the Ensemblator (Clark et al., Protein Sci 2015; 24:1528), a novel approach to compare user-defined groups of models, in residue level detail. Here we describe Ensemblator v3, an open-source program that employs the same basic ensemble comparison strategy but includes major advances that make it more robust, powerful, and user-friendly. Ensemblator v3 carries out multiple sequence alignments to facilitate the generation of ensembles from non-identical input structures, automatically optimizes the key global overlay parameter, optionally performs "ensemble clustering" to classify the models into subgroups, and calculates a novel "discrimination index" that quantifies similarities and differences, at residue or atom level, between each pair of subgroups. The clustering and automatic options mean that no pre-knowledge about an ensemble is required for its analysis. After describing the novel features of Ensemblator v3, we demonstrate its utility using three case studies that illustrate the ease with which complex analyses are accomplished, and the kinds of insights derived from clustering into subgroups and from the detailed information that locates significant differences. The Ensemblator v3 enhances the structural biology toolbox by greatly expanding the kinds of problems to which this ensemble comparison strategy can be applied.
© 2017 The Protein Society.

Keywords:  NMR ensemble; Rosetta; clustering; ensemble clustering; protein structure comparison; python; structure prediction; superposition; template-based modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28762605      PMCID: PMC5734391          DOI: 10.1002/pro.3249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  24 in total

1.  Solution structure and dynamics of ribonuclease Sa.

Authors:  D Laurents; J M Pérez-Cañadillas; J Santoro; M Rico; D Schell; C N Pace; M Bruix
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-15

2.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Robert B Best; Mark A Depristo; Christopher M Dobson; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Clustering by passing messages between data points.

Authors:  Brendan J Frey; Delbert Dueck
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Solution structure of FKBP, a rotamase enzyme and receptor for FK506 and rapamycin.

Authors:  S W Michnick; M K Rosen; T J Wandless; M Karplus; S L Schreiber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Residue-level global and local ensemble-ensemble comparisons of protein domains.

Authors:  Sarah A Clark; Dale E Tronrud; P Andrew Karplus
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Solution structure of a calmodulin-target peptide complex by multidimensional NMR.

Authors:  M Ikura; G M Clore; A M Gronenborn; G Zhu; C B Klee; A Bax
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Avoiding common pitfalls when clustering biological data.

Authors:  Tom Ronan; Zhijie Qi; Kristen M Naegle
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 8.192

8.  Conformational diversity analysis reveals three functional mechanisms in proteins.

Authors:  Alexander Miguel Monzon; Diego Javier Zea; María Silvina Fornasari; Tadeo E Saldaño; Sebastian Fernandez-Alberti; Silvio C E Tosatto; Gustavo Parisi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Protein Geometry Database: a flexible engine to explore backbone conformations and their relationships to covalent geometry.

Authors:  Donald S Berkholz; Peter B Krenesky; John R Davidson; P Andrew Karplus
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A coupled equilibrium shift mechanism in calmodulin-mediated signal transduction.

Authors:  Jörg Gsponer; John Christodoulou; Andrea Cavalli; Jennifer M Bui; Barbara Richter; Christopher M Dobson; Michele Vendruscolo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  6 in total

1.  The LC8-RavP ensemble Structure Evinces A Role for LC8 in Regulating Lyssavirus Polymerase Functionality.

Authors:  Nathan E Jespersen; Cedric Leyrat; Francine C Gérard; Jean-Marie Bourhis; Danielle Blondel; Marc Jamin; Elisar Barbar
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Proteomimetic Zinc Finger Domains with Modified Metal-binding β-Turns.

Authors:  Shilpa R Rao; W Seth Horne
Journal:  Pept Sci (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-06-07

3.  Heterogeneous-Backbone Proteomimetic Analogues of Lasiocepsin, a Disulfide-Rich Antimicrobial Peptide with a Compact Tertiary Fold.

Authors:  Chino C Cabalteja; Qiao Lin; Thomas W Harmon; Shilpa R Rao; Y Peter Di; W Seth Horne
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Systematic identification of recognition motifs for the hub protein LC8.

Authors:  Nathan Jespersen; Aidan Estelle; Nathan Waugh; Norman E Davey; Cecilia Blikstad; York-Christoph Ammon; Anna Akhmanova; Ylva Ivarsson; David A Hendrix; Elisar Barbar
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2019-07-02

5.  Ligand-induced shifts in conformational ensembles that describe transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Sabab Hasan Khan; Sean M Braet; Stephen John Koehler; Elizabeth Elacqua; Ganesh Srinivasan Anand; C Denise Okafor
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Automated NMR resonance assignments and structure determination using a minimal set of 4D spectra.

Authors:  Thomas Evangelidis; Santrupti Nerli; Jiří Nováček; Andrew E Brereton; P Andrew Karplus; Rochelle R Dotas; Vincenzo Venditti; Nikolaos G Sgourakis; Konstantinos Tripsianes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.