Literature DB >> 28762498

Accuracy of on-site tests to detect anemia during prenatal care.

Soha Sobhy1, Ewelina Rogozinska1,2, Khalid S Khan1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a substantial contributor to poor pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. Access to laboratory facilities is limited; therefore, on-site testing warrants attention.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of on-site tests to detect anemia in pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from inception until March 2016, with no language restrictions, using the terms "pregnancy," "an(a)emia," and "h(a)emoglobin." SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of on-site hemoglobin tests versus laboratory-based reference tests during pregnancy were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study characteristics and true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative rates were extracted. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and post-test probabilities were calculated. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level of less than 110 g/L. MAIN
RESULTS: Ten studies (4239 participants) were assessed. Copper sulfate provided 97% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 88%-100%) and 71% specificity (95% CI 55%-85%); the Sahli method provided 86% sensitivity (95% CI 75%-94%) and 83% specificity (95% CI 68%-93%); and HemoCue provided 85% sensitivity (95% CI 79%-90%) and 80% specificity (95% CI 76%-83%).
CONCLUSIONS: Some on-site tests are accurate and should be made widely available to improve detection of anemia in pregnancy.
© 2017 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anemia; On-site tests; Point-of-care tests; Pregnancy; Prenatal care; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28762498     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  2 in total

Review 1.  Emerging point-of-care technologies for anemia detection.

Authors:  Ran An; Yuning Huang; Yuncheng Man; Russell W Valentine; Erdem Kucukal; Utku Goreke; Zoe Sekyonda; Connie Piccone; Amma Owusu-Ansah; Sanjay Ahuja; Jane A Little; Umut A Gurkan
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Potential new tool for anemia screening: An evaluation of the performance and usability of the TrueHb Hemometer.

Authors:  Megan Parker; Kelsey Barrett; Maria Kahn; Dominira Saul; Pooja Bansil; Charlotte Tawiah; Nicole Advani; Stephanie Zobrist; Tala de Los Santos; Emily Gerth-Guyette
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.