Literature DB >> 28762416

Correlations between preparation methods, structural features and electrochemical Li-storage behavior of reduced graphene oxide.

Farjana J Sonia1, Hemen Kalita2, M Aslam3, Amartya Mukhopadhyay4.   

Abstract

Wide differences in the structural features of graphenic carbon, especially in the case of reduced graphene oxides (rGO), are expected to have considerable impacts on the properties, thus leading to significant scatter and poor understanding/prediction of their performances for various applications, including as electrode materials for electrochemical Li-storage. In this context, the present work develops a comprehensive understanding (via thorough experimentation, including in situ X-ray diffraction studies, and analysis) on the effects of graphene oxide (GO) reduction methods/conditions on the structural features (mainly 'graphenic' ordering) and concomitant influences of the same on electrochemical Li-storage behavior. 'Moderately oxidized' GO (O/C ∼0.41) was reduced via three different methods, viz., (i) using hydrazine hydrate vapor at room temperature (rGO-H; O/C ∼0.23), (ii) thermal reduction by annealing at just 500 °C (rGO-A; O/C ∼0.20) and (iii) hydrazine treatment, followed by the same annealing treatment (rGO-HA; O/C ∼0.17). Raman spectroscopy, in situ X-ray diffraction recorded during annealing and high resolution TEM imaging indicate that while GO and rGO-H had considerable defect contents [I(D)/I(G) ∼1.4 for rGO-H], including a very non-uniform interlayer spacing (varying between 3.1 and 3.6 Å), the 500 °C annealed rGO-A and rGO-HA had significantly reduced defect contents [I(D)/I(G) ∼0.6] and near-perfect 'graphenic' ordering with a uniform interlayer spacing of ∼3.35 Å. Despite the nanoscaled dimensions, defect structures, especially the non-uniform interlayer spacing, resulted in relatively poor reversible Li-capacity and rate capability for the non-annealed rGO-H, even in comparison to the bulk graphitic carbon. By contrast, the annealed rGOs, especially the rGO-HA, not only possessed a superior reversible Li-capacity of ∼450 mA h g-1 (at C/20), but also exhibited a significantly improved rate capability (even compared to most rGOs reported in the literature), retaining ∼120 mA h g-1 along with flat potential profile (below ∼0.2 V against Li/Li+) even at 10C (as possibly never reported before with graphitic/graphenic carbons).

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28762416     DOI: 10.1039/c7nr03348f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  5 in total

1.  Mesostructural study on graphenic-based carbon prepared from coconut shells by heat treatment and liquid exfoliation.

Authors:  Deril Ristiani; Retno Asih; Fahmi Astuti; Malik Anjelh Baqiya; Chonthicha Kaewhan; Sarayut Tunmee; Hideki Nakajima; Siriwat Soontaranon
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-02-26

2.  Influence of the Specific Surface Area of Graphene Nanoplatelets on the Capacity of Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Authors:  Iván Esteve-Adell; María Porcel-Valenzuela; Leire Zubizarreta; Mayte Gil-Agustí; Marta García-Pellicer; Alfredo Quijano-Lopez
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  Production of chlorine-containing functional group doped graphene powders using Yucel's method as anode materials for Li-ion batteries.

Authors:  Hurmus Gursu; Yağmur Guner; Melih Besir Arvas; Kamil Burak Dermenci; Umut Savaci; Metin Gencten; Servet Turan; Yucel Sahin
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  Observation of critical magnetic behavior in 2D carbon based composites.

Authors:  Vineeta Shukla
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-01-09

5.  Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Malachite Green in Seawater by the Hybrid of Zinc-Oxide Nanorods Grown on Three-Dimensional (3D) Reduced Graphene Oxide(RGO)/Ni Foam.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Chaoyue Cai; Mingyan Wang; Qian Guo; Biao Wang; Weina Luo; Yujuan Wang; Chenyan Zhang; Lihua Zhou; Dongen Zhang; Zhiwei Tong; Yuqing Liu; Jun Chen
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.