Literature DB >> 28762415

Biocompatible 3D printed polymers via fused deposition modelling direct C2C12 cellular phenotype in vitro.

Rowan P Rimington1, Andrew J Capel2, Steven D R Christie3, Mark P Lewis1.   

Abstract

The capability to 3D print bespoke biologically receptive parts within short time periods has driven the growing prevalence of additive manufacture (AM) technology within biological settings, however limited research concerning cellular interaction with 3D printed polymers has been undertaken. In this work, we used skeletal muscle C2C12 cell line in order to ascertain critical evidence of cellular behaviour in response to multiple bio-receptive candidate polymers; polylactic acid (PLA), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polycarbonate (PC) 3D printed via fused deposition modelling (FDM). The extrusion based nature of FDM elicited polymer specific topographies, within which C2C12 cells exhibited reduced metabolic activity when compared to optimised surfaces of tissue culture plastic, however assay viability readings remained high across polymers outlining viable phenotypes. C2C12 cells exhibited consistently high levels of morphological alignment across polymers, however differential myotube widths and levels of transcriptional myogenin expression appeared to demonstrate response specific thresholds at which varying polymer selection potentiates cellular differentiation, elicits pre-mature early myotube formation and directs subsequent morphological phenotype. Here we observed biocompatible AM polymers manufactured via FDM, which also appear to hold the potential to simultaneously manipulate the desired biological phenotype and enhance the biomimicry of skeletal muscle cells in vitro via AM polymer choice and careful selection of machine processing parameters. When considered in combination with the associated design freedom of AM, this may provide the opportunity to not only enhance the efficiency of creating biomimetic models, but also to precisely control the biological output within such scaffolds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28762415     DOI: 10.1039/c7lc00577f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  12 in total

1.  Simple and low-cost production of hybrid 3D-printed microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Lynh Huyen Duong; Pin-Chuan Chen
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Influence of Multiple Thermomechanical Processing of 3D Filaments Based on Polylactic Acid and Polyhydroxybutyrate on Their Rheological and Utility Properties.

Authors:  Roderik Plavec; Vojtech Horváth; Slávka Hlaváčiková; Leona Omaníková; Martina Repiská; Elena Medlenová; Jozef Feranc; Ján Kruželák; Radek Přikryl; Silvestr Figalla; Soňa Kontárová; Andrej Baco; Lucia Danišová; Zuzana Vanovčanová; Pavol Alexy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 3.  3D-Printed Biosensor Arrays for Medical Diagnostics.

Authors:  Mohamed Sharafeldin; Abby Jones; James F Rusling
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Scalable 3D Printed Molds for Human Tissue Engineered Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Andrew J Capel; Rowan P Rimington; Jacob W Fleming; Darren J Player; Luke A Baker; Mark C Turner; Julia M Jones; Neil R W Martin; Richard A Ferguson; Vivek C Mudera; Mark P Lewis
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-14

Review 5.  3D Graphene Scaffolds for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Valentina Palmieri; Francesca Sciandra; Manuela Bozzi; Marco De Spirito; Massimiliano Papi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-05

Review 6.  Three-Dimensional Printed Devices in Droplet Microfluidics.

Authors:  Jia Ming Zhang; Qinglei Ji; Huiling Duan
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 7.  Replace and repair: Biomimetic bioprinting for effective muscle engineering.

Authors:  Cooper Blake; Oliver Massey; Mitchell Boyd-Moss; Kate Firipis; Aaqil Rifai; Stephanie Franks; Anita Quigley; Robert Kapsa; David R Nisbet; Richard J Williams
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2021-07-08

Review 8.  Biomaterials in Tendon and Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering: Current Trends and Challenges.

Authors:  Megane Beldjilali-Labro; Alejandro Garcia Garcia; Firas Farhat; Fahmi Bedoui; Jean-François Grosset; Murielle Dufresne; Cécile Legallais
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Functional regeneration of tissue engineered skeletal muscle in vitro is dependent on the inclusion of basement membrane proteins.

Authors:  Jacob W Fleming; Andrew J Capel; Rowan P Rimington; Darren J Player; Alexandra Stolzing; Mark P Lewis
Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-08-19

10.  Bioengineered human skeletal muscle capable of functional regeneration.

Authors:  J W Fleming; A J Capel; R P Rimington; P Wheeler; A N Leonard; N C Bishop; O G Davies; M P Lewis
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.