Kibo Nam1, Maria Stanczak1, Flemming Forsberg1, Ji-Bin Liu1, John R Eisenbrey1, Charalambos C Solomides2, Andrej Lyshchik3. 1. Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. 2. Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. andrej.lyshchik@jefferson.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of molecular ultrasound with dual-targeted microbubbles to detect metastatic disease in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in swine model of naturally occurring melanoma. The SLN is the first lymph node in the lymphatic chain draining primary tumor, and early detection of metastatic SLN involvement is critical in the appropriate management of melanoma. PROCEDURE: Nine Sinclair swine (weight 3-7 kg; Sinclair BioResources, Columbia, MO, USA) with naturally occurring melanoma were examined. Siemens S3000 scanner with a 9L4 probe was used for imaging (Siemens Healthineers, Mountain View, CA). Dual-targeted contrast agent was created using Targestar SA microbubbles (Targeson, San Diego, CA, USA) labeled with ανβ3-integrin and P-selectin antibodies. Targestar SA microbubbles labeled with IgG-labeled were used as control. First, peritumoral injection of Sonazoid contrast agent (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) was performed to detect SLNs. After that, dual-targeted and IGG control Targestar SA microbubbles were injected intravenously with a 30-min interval between injections. Labeled Targestar SA microbubbles were allowed to circulate for 4 min to enable binding. After that, two sets of image clips were acquired several seconds before and after a high-power destruction sequence. The mean intensity difference pre- to post-bubble destruction within the region of interest placed over SLN was calculated as a relative measure of targeted microbubble contrast agent retention. This process was repeated for non-SLNs as controls. All lymph nodes evaluated on imaging were surgically removed and histologically examined for presence of metastatic involvement. RESULTS: A total of 43 lymph nodes (25 SLNs and 18 non-SLNs) were included in the analysis with 18 SLNs demonstrating metastatic involvement greater than 5 % on histology. All non-SLNs were benign. The mean intensity (± SD) of the dual-targeted microbubbles for metastatic SLNs was significantly higher than that of benign LNs (18.05 ± 19.11 vs. 3.30 ± 6.65 AU; p = 0.0008), while IgG-labeled control microbubbles demonstrated no difference in retained contrast intensity between metastatic and benign lymph nodes (0.39 ± 1.14 vs. 0.03 ± 0.24 AU; p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that dual-targeted microbubbles labeled with P-selectin and ανβ3-integrin antibodies may aid in detecting metastatic involvement in SLNs of melanoma.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of molecular ultrasound with dual-targeted microbubbles to detect metastatic disease in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in swine model of naturally occurring melanoma. The SLN is the first lymph node in the lymphatic chain draining primary tumor, and early detection of metastatic SLN involvement is critical in the appropriate management of melanoma. PROCEDURE: Nine Sinclair swine (weight 3-7 kg; Sinclair BioResources, Columbia, MO, USA) with naturally occurring melanoma were examined. Siemens S3000 scanner with a 9L4 probe was used for imaging (Siemens Healthineers, Mountain View, CA). Dual-targeted contrast agent was created using Targestar SA microbubbles (Targeson, San Diego, CA, USA) labeled with ανβ3-integrin and P-selectin antibodies. Targestar SA microbubbles labeled with IgG-labeled were used as control. First, peritumoral injection of Sonazoid contrast agent (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) was performed to detect SLNs. After that, dual-targeted and IGG control Targestar SA microbubbles were injected intravenously with a 30-min interval between injections. Labeled Targestar SA microbubbles were allowed to circulate for 4 min to enable binding. After that, two sets of image clips were acquired several seconds before and after a high-power destruction sequence. The mean intensity difference pre- to post-bubble destruction within the region of interest placed over SLN was calculated as a relative measure of targeted microbubble contrast agent retention. This process was repeated for non-SLNs as controls. All lymph nodes evaluated on imaging were surgically removed and histologically examined for presence of metastatic involvement. RESULTS: A total of 43 lymph nodes (25 SLNs and 18 non-SLNs) were included in the analysis with 18 SLNs demonstrating metastatic involvement greater than 5 % on histology. All non-SLNs were benign. The mean intensity (± SD) of the dual-targeted microbubbles for metastatic SLNs was significantly higher than that of benign LNs (18.05 ± 19.11 vs. 3.30 ± 6.65 AU; p = 0.0008), while IgG-labeled control microbubbles demonstrated no difference in retained contrast intensity between metastatic and benign lymph nodes (0.39 ± 1.14 vs. 0.03 ± 0.24 AU; p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that dual-targeted microbubbles labeled with P-selectin and ανβ3-integrin antibodies may aid in detecting metastatic involvement in SLNs of melanoma.
Authors: Ali Sever; Anne Broillet; Michel Schneider; Karina Cox; Sue Jones; Jenny Weeks; Pippa Mills; David Fish; Peter Jones Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Chi Young Shim; Ya Ni Liu; Tamara Atkinson; Aris Xie; Ted Foster; Brian P Davidson; Mackenzie Treible; Yue Qi; José A López; Adam Munday; Zaverio Ruggeri; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Ji-Bin Liu; Daniel A Merton; Adam C Berger; Flemming Forsberg; Agnieszka Witkiewicz; Hongjia Zhao; John R Eisenbrey; Traci B Fox; Barry B Goldberg Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Jason M Warram; Anna G Sorace; Reshu Saini; Heidi R Umphrey; Kurt R Zinn; Kenneth Hoyt Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Kerrington R Molhoek; Gulsun Erdag; J K Rasamny; Cheryl Murphy; Donna Deacon; James W Patterson; Craig L Slingluff; David L Brautigan Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Ingo Stoffels; Stefan Morscher; Iris Helfrich; Uwe Hillen; Julia Leyh; Julia Lehy; Neal C Burton; Thomas C P Sardella; Jing Claussen; Thorsten D Poeppel; Hagen S Bachmann; Alexander Roesch; Klaus Griewank; Dirk Schadendorf; Matthias Gunzer; Joachim Klode Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Jürgen K Willmann; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Kai Chen; Olivier Gheysens; Martin Rodriguez-Porcel; Amelie M Lutz; Ian Y Chen; Xiaoyuan Chen; Sanjiv S Gambhir Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 11.105