| Literature DB >> 28761499 |
Jae Gwang Park1, Young-Jin Son2, Tae Ho Lee3, Nam Joon Baek3, Deok Hyo Yoon4, Tae Woong Kim5, Adithan Aravinthan6, Sungyoul Hong1, Jong-Hoon Kim6, Gi-Ho Sung4, Jae Youl Cho1.
Abstract
Cordyceps militaris is used widely as a traditional medicine in East Asia. Although a few studies have attempted to elucidate the anticancer activities of C. militaris, the precise mechanism of C. militaris therapeutic effects is not fully understood. We examined the anticancer activities of C. militaris ethanolic extract (Cm-EE) and its cellular and molecular mechanisms. For this purpose, a xenograft mouse model bearing murine T cell lymphoma (RMA) cell-derived cancers was established to investigate in vivo anticancer mechanisms. MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] assay, immunoblotting analysis, and flow cytometric assay were employed to check in vitro cytotoxicity, molecular targets, and proapoptotic action of Cm-EE. Interestingly, cancer sizes and mass were reduced in a C. militaris-administered group. Levels of the phosphorylated forms of p85 and AKT were clearly decreased in the group administered with Cm-EE. This result indicated that levels of phosphoglycogen synthase kinase 3β (p-GSK3β) and cleaved caspase-3 were increased with orally administered Cm-EE. In addition, Cm-EE directly inhibited the viability of cultured RMA cells and C6 glioma cells. The number of proapoptotic cells was significantly increased in a Cm-EE treated group compared with a control group. Our results suggested that C. militaris might be able to inhibit cancer growth through regulation of p85/AKT-dependent or GSK3β-related caspase-3-dependent apoptosis.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28761499 PMCID: PMC5518515 DOI: 10.1155/2017/8474703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Anticancer activity of Cm-EE in a xenograft mouse model with RMA cell-derived cancer. RMA cells (1 × 106 cells per mouse) were injected subcutaneously into backs next to right hind legs. Mice with RMA cells were sorted into groups (n = 10/group) for orally administrated Cm-EE (20 mg/kg) or vehicle. (a) Tumors grown in xenograft mouse model with RMA cell-derived cancer were taken by a digital camera. (b) Induced tumor sizes were measured at indicated days until experiment end. (c) Effect of Cm-EE on proteins in apoptotic pathways was evaluated through determining the levels of total and phosphorylated Akt, p85, GSK3β, cleaved caspase-3, and β-actin in tumor tissues by immunoblotting analysis. (d) Phytochemical finger printing of Cm-EE was evaluated by HPLC analysis. p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 compared with control.
Figure 2Effect of Cm-EE on apoptotic cell death and survival pathways. (a) RMA cells (2 × 106 cells/ml) were incubated with Cm-EE for 24 h. Viability of RMA cells was then evaluated by MTT assays. (b) Cell apoptosis was determined by Annexin V/7ADD staining. Annexin V+ (right lower quadrant) and Annexin V+/7AAD+ (right upper quadrant) cells indicate early apoptotic and late apoptotic cell levels. The levels of Cm-EE-treated apoptotic cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. (c) Levels of phosphorylated Akt, p85, and GSK3β in Cm-EE-treated RMA cells were detected by immunoblotting assays.
Figure 3Effect of Cm-EE on tumorigenic responses. (a) C6 glioma cells (2 × 106 cells/ml) incubated with Cm-EE for 24 h. Viability of RMA cells was evaluated by MTT assays. (b) Effect of Cm-EE on migration was measured by wound healing assay. (c) The invasion capacity of C6 cells under Cm-EE exposure was analyzed by hematoxylin and eosin staining and quantitatively evaluated by counting the Matrigel layer-invaded cells (B). Photographs were taken with a digital camera (A). Means of migrated and invasive cells were measured by ImageJ software. p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 compared with control.
Figure 4Putative mechanism of Cm-EE-mediated anticancer responses. GSK3β: glycogen synthase kinase 3β; PI3K: phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase; and Cm-EE: Cordyceps militaris ethanolic extract.