Literature DB >> 28761459

Molecular Detection and Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in Chicken, Beef, and Lamb Meat Consumed in Northwestern Iran.

Mahmoud Mahami-Oskouei1,2, Mohammad Moradi1,2, Esmaeil Fallah2, Faezeh Hamidi2, Najibeh Asl Rahnamaye Akbari2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Toxoplasma gondii, the obligate, intracellular parasite afflicts human in diverse ways such as ingestion of tissue cysts in undercooked meat. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and genotyping of Toxoplasma isolated from meat samples being consumed in East Azerbaijan, Northwest of Iran.
METHODS: Overall, 150 samples including chicken, beef and lamb meat were collected from retailers in different regions of Tabriz, northwestern Iran during April to September 2014. Molecular detection was done by amplifying B1 gene and T. gondii surface antigen 2 (SAG2) loci. For genotyping of T. gondii, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) was performed using Sau3AI and HhaI restriction enzymes. Finally, three positive isolate from each host was sequenced to evaluate and phylogenetic analysis.
RESULTS: Overall, 26 (17.33%) samples were positive for T. gondii including 4 (8%) isolate from chicken, 8 (16%) isolates from cattle and 14 (28%) isolates from sheep. According to the RFLP patterns, sequencing and phylogenetic results, all of the samples were identified as genotype I.
CONCLUSION: The results indicated a potential risk of transmission of the disease through the consumption of infected meat. This is particularly important especially for pregnant women and immuno-compromised patients and this suggests that the training on the prevention of infection is necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iran; Meat; PCR; Surface antigen P22; Toxoplasma gondii

Year:  2017        PMID: 28761459      PMCID: PMC5522697     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Parasitol        ISSN: 1735-7020            Impact factor:   1.012


Introduction

T. gondii an important etiologic agent of toxoplasmosis and foodborne diseases is now a global concern (1). A human can normally infect via two major ways i.e. exposure to contaminated soil by oocyst, or ingestion of uncooked or under-cooked meat containing tissue cyst (2, 3). Toxoplasmosis has variable manifestations in the host ranging from asymptomatic to serious symptoms (4). Pathogenesis of the disease in human depends on host factors (immunity, genetic, nutrition) and parasite factors (inoculums size, parasite life-cycle stage, strain) (5–7). The most severe clinical outcomes are observed in immunocompromised patients such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and children born with congenital toxoplasmosis (8, 9). Different genes loci and markers have been evaluated and utilized for identification and classification of T. gondii, however, SAG2 gene locus by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technique have been widely used for this purpose (10). T. gondii has been analyzed into three genotypes (I, II, III) based on RFLP (11). Molecular characterization and genotyping of T. gondii in different populations and regions may not only help to study prevalence and identification of dominant T. gondii genotypes, determine the most common source and way of transmission, potential drugs towards it and production of vaccine, as well as control of the disease (11, 12). In consideration to the prevalence in Iran, 4.7% meat has been the reported as the possible source (13). Genotyping of 13 positive soil samples in Iran showed that 69% were type III, 3 isolates depicted type I and III (23%), while 8% were type I (14). The genotyping of toxoplasmosis only on meat products and blood samples of animal were focused (15–17) and the dominant genetic type in positive meat products has been found as type I (18–20). Given the importance of toxoplasmosis especially in seronegative pregnant women and immunocompromised patients as well as the relatively high consumption of meat in diets and the risk of transmitting the infection, this study was designed to investigation the prevalence and genotyping of Toxoplasma isolated from meat samples in East Azerbaijan, Northwest of Iran.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

A total of 150 samples, included chicken, beef and lamb meat (50 samples of each) were collected from retailers randomly selected in different regions: North, South, East, West and Center of Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Province during April to September 2014. Of 50 g of each sample was separated and stored at −20 °C until testing.

Sample preparation and DNA extraction

About 20 g of each meat sample mixed with 15 ml of saline containing 0.05% pepsin, and then well homogenized, was incubated at 37 °C for 4 h and centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded and DNA was extracted from the pellet by using a commercial kit (Genet Bio Global Gene Network, South Korea) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracts were stored at −20 °C for further use.

Molecular detection by B1 gene

Polymerase chain reaction by amplifying B1 gene was used for detection of Toxoplasma in all samples. The specific primers were used describing in previous studies (14, 21): forward (5′-GGAACTGCATCCGTTCATGAG-3′) and reverse (5′-TCTTTAAAGCGTTCGTGGTC-3′). PCR volume was adjusted to 20 μl including: Tris-HCL (pH 9.0)10 mM, each dNTP 250 μM, KCL (30mM), MgCl2 (1.5mM), Taq DNA polymerase (1U), 10 pmol each primer and 2μl (∼25ng) of template DNA. PCR was set up at 95 °C for 10 min as initial denaturation followed by 40 cycles of denaturation 94 °C (30 s), annealing 55 °C (1 min), extension 72 °C (1 min) and elongation step at 72 °C (10 min) as final extension. Finally, 5μl of amplified PCR products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel and visualized under UV after staining with safe stain dye.

SAG2 locus polymerase chain reaction

SAG2 locus of Toxoplasma was selected and nested-PCR method was used for amplifying this gene. Primers were used for 5′-SAG2 primary PCR (forward: 5′-GCTACCTCGAACAGGAACAC-3′, reverse: 5′-GCATCAACAGTCTTCGTTGC-3′), 5′-SAG2 secondary amplification (forward: 5′-GAAATGTTTCAGGTTGCTGC-3′, reverse: 5′-GCAAGAGCGAACTTGAACAC-3′) and also 3′-SAG2 primary PCR (forward: 5′-TCTGTTCTCCGAAGTGACTCC-3′, reverse: 5′-TCAAAGCGTGCATTATCGC-3′), 3′-SAG2 secondary amplification (forward: 5′-ATTCTCATGCCTCCGCTTC-3′, reverse: 5′-AACGTTTCACGAAGGCACAC-3′) (10). The first round PCR was performed in total volume 20 μl including: Tris-HCL (pH 9.0)10 mM, each dNTP (dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP) 250 μM, KCL (30mM), MgCl2 (2mM), Taq DNA polymerase (1U), 20 pmol each primer and 4μl (∼50ng) of template DNA. PCR cycles were set up for 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 41 cycles of 94 °C for 45 sec, 59 °C for 45 sec and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. Second round PCR was done on the amplified PCR product with similar conditions but with annealing temperature set at 54°C and 2 μl of first round product. The amplicons were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel and visualized under UV. PCR was conducted with positive and negative controls.

Genotype analysis

Three types (I, II or III) of T. gondii were determined by PCR–RFLP of the amplified SAG2 gene according to previous study (11). For genotyping, the secondary nested-PCR products of 5′-SAG2 and 3′-SAG2 were digested by Sau3AI and HhaI restriction enzymes respectively (22, 23). To prepare the RFLP reactions, 7μl of PCR product was mixed with 1μl of restriction enzyme and 1μl of enzyme buffer and total volume was adjusted to 15μl by adding distilled water. The preparation was then incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Restriction fragments were analyzed on after electrophoresis on 3% agarose gel.

SAG2 sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

In order to evaluate and confirm the results of RFLP, secondary PCR products of nine positive isolates (three of each host) were sequenced by ABIPRISMTM 3130 genetic analyzer automated sequencer. The sequences were compared with GenBank sequences by using Blast (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) for sequences similarity and genotype was determined. Multiple sequence alignment was done by (http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin). MEGA 5.05 software and maximum likelihood algorithm with kimura 2-parameter model and 1000 bootstrap resampling were used for phylogenetic analysis.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data and results were expressed as a percentage.

Results

We obtained 150 samples consisting 50 chicken, 50 beef, and 50 lamb meats. Primarily, Toxoplasma in samples was detected by amplifying B1 gene that positive samples showed 194bp band on 2% agarose gel (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1:

Agarose gel electrophoresis of T.gondii B1 gene amplification, M: DNA size marker 100 bp (Fermentas); NC: Negative control; PC: Positive control; Lane 1,4,5–7 negative samples; Lane 2,3 (194 bp), positive meat samples

Agarose gel electrophoresis of T.gondii B1 gene amplification, M: DNA size marker 100 bp (Fermentas); NC: Negative control; PC: Positive control; Lane 1,4,5–7 negative samples; Lane 2,3 (194 bp), positive meat samples 5′ and 3′ flanking of T. gondii surface antigen P22 was amplified successfully for all samples by nested-PCR method. After gel electrophoresis of secondary PCR products, we detected 241bp and 221bp fragments for 5′ and 3′ SAG2, respectively (Fig. 2). In total 26 (17.33%) tissue, samples were positive for T. gondii, which included 4 (8%) chicken meat, 8 (16%) cattle sample and 14 (28%) sheep tissue.
Fig. 2:

Nested-PCR amplicons of T.gondii SAG2 loci. Left (5′-SAG2): NC: Negative control; M: DNA size marker 100 bp; lane 1,2,3 (241 bp): positive meat samples; PC: Positive control. Right (3′-SAG2): NC: Negative control; M: DNA size marker 50 bp; lane 1, 2 (221 bp): positive meat samples

Nested-PCR amplicons of T.gondii SAG2 loci. Left (5′-SAG2): NC: Negative control; M: DNA size marker 100 bp; lane 1,2,3 (241 bp): positive meat samples; PC: Positive control. Right (3′-SAG2): NC: Negative control; M: DNA size marker 50 bp; lane 1, 2 (221 bp): positive meat samples All of the 26 positive meat samples were genotyped using 5′ and 3′-SAG2 locus by using RFLP method and two restriction enzymes. These samples showed a 241bp fragment in 5′-SAG2 locus and 221bp fragment in 3′-SAG2, respectively (Fig. 3). According to the RFLP patterns, there was not cutting site on both fragments for these enzymes which indicated all of the samples were of genotype I (100%) based on the previous studies (14, 15) neither genotype II nor III was found in our study.
Fig. 3:

Restriction analysis of 5′-SAG2 locus of T.gondii using Sau3AI (left): Lane 1, 2, 3 (241 bp): positive meat samples (genotype I) and 3′-SAG2 locus by HhaI (right): lane 1 (221 bp): positive meat sample (genotype I); M: DNA size marker 50 bp

Restriction analysis of 5′-SAG2 locus of T.gondii using Sau3AI (left): Lane 1, 2, 3 (241 bp): positive meat samples (genotype I) and 3′-SAG2 locus by HhaI (right): lane 1 (221 bp): positive meat sample (genotype I); M: DNA size marker 50 bp The products of the second step of nested-PCR from nine different isolates were selected for sequencing. These nucleotide sequences showed 100% homology in comparison with the other reported sequences in GenBank and after alignment, there was confirmed that T. gondii belonged to type I genotype. Three nucleotide sequences (one of each host) from this investigation were submitted and registered in GenBank under following accession numbers KT345599, KT345600, and KT345601. Multiple sequence alignment showed the similarities and differences between these sequences and other GenBank registered sequences (Fig. 4). In phylogenic analysis, T. gondii isolates of this study relied on a branch which represents type I and similar to sequences that submitted from other countries. For drawing the phylogeny tree, Hammondia Hammond (XM_008884253) was considered as an outgroup (Fig. 5). R (Transition/Transversion bias) was estimated to 0.55 using kimura 2-parameter model in MEGA 5.05.
Fig. 4:

Multiple sequence alignments of T.gondii surface antigen 2 gene based on reference sequences. (KT345599, KT345600, KT345601): accession numbers of sequences registered in GenBank from the present study; Ca: Cattle; Sh: Sheep; Ch: Chicken

Fig. 5:

The phylogeny tree of Toxoplasma gondii based on SAG2 gene sequences from three different host isolates of Northwest Iran (KT345599-KT345601) and other previous GenBank registered sequences using maximum likelihood algorithm with kimura 2-parameter model and 1000 bootstrap resampling. Hammondia hammondi was considered as outgroup branch

Multiple sequence alignments of T.gondii surface antigen 2 gene based on reference sequences. (KT345599, KT345600, KT345601): accession numbers of sequences registered in GenBank from the present study; Ca: Cattle; Sh: Sheep; Ch: Chicken The phylogeny tree of Toxoplasma gondii based on SAG2 gene sequences from three different host isolates of Northwest Iran (KT345599-KT345601) and other previous GenBank registered sequences using maximum likelihood algorithm with kimura 2-parameter model and 1000 bootstrap resampling. Hammondia hammondi was considered as outgroup branch

Discussion

Toxoplasmosis is one of the major causes of life-threatening infection especially in immuno-compromised patients such as HIV positive and patients undergoing anti-cancer chemotherapy or others who received immunosuppressive drugs (8, 9, 24). From the epidemiological point of view, meat is important source for transmission of this parasite (25–27). The high prevalence of toxoplasmosis among domestic animals such as cattle, sheep, and chicken (28, 29) and raw or undercooked meat can be an important factor in the transmission of the infection to humans (2, 3). Utilized surface antigens of T. gondii was considered as appropriate antigens for detection and genotyping (10), we also used SAG2 loci and nested-PCR method for this purpose in the present investigation. Detection of T. gondii in tachyzoite or bradyzoite form is not very difficult because the parasite gets destroyed in a short time (25) but oocyst form, which has a resistant wall consisting of several layers and is difficult for DNA extraction (8, 10, 30). Identification and genotyping of T. gondii directly from tissue have some advantage since preventing artificial prevalence of strains (18, 31–32). Present investigation was conducted to detect and genotyping of T. gondii in chicken, beef and lamb meat samples from East Azerbaijan, Northwest Iran. The main objective of this study was to identify T. gondii in meat consumption. In our study, 17.33% of all samples were positive by using B1 gene and SAG2 loci. The highest and lowest rate of infection was furnished in sheep and chicken tissues, respectively. However, RFLP pattern, sequencing and phylogenetic results showed that type I was predominant genotype of T. gondii. In the previous study, which performed for genotyping of T. gondii in meat products in the northwest of Iran, parasite contamination found in 16.6, 19.1, 15 and 56.6% (overall 24.3%) in salami, sausages, hamburger and kebab samples, respectively and genotype I was reported as the most prevalent genotype based on SAG2 and RFLP method (15). Our results were incompatible with this study. In another study from southwest of Iran, performed by amplification of GRA6 using nested-PCR method, found high contamination infection rate of T. gondii in sheep (38%), nevertheless almost dissimilar rate in cattle samples (8.57%). However, they did not genotype the parasite (33). The high level of contamination in sheep seems to be related to sheep rearing conditions in the region. Investigation from Ahvaz west of Iran used B1 gene to determine the prevalence of T. gondii in meat and meat products and showed 14% and 4% positivity in lamb and beef samples, respectively (13). Similar study conducted in UK, depicted 38% of meat samples (including beef, lamb, and pork) T. gondii contamination. After SAG2 analysis, all samples were of type I along with simultaneous presence of SAG2 types (I, II) (5). Although the lack of other genotypes in this study is consistent with the previous studies (34, 35), some studies have also found type II or III as the main genotypes (17, 29, 36). These controversial results are probably due to various genotypes of T. gondii in different geographic regions. Toxoplasma strains in animals and human have not the same distribution in a same geographical region.

Conclusion

A potential risk of transmission of the disease indicated through the consumption of infected meat. This is particularly important especially for pregnant women and immuno-compromised patients and this proposes that control and skillful training are required for the prevention of infection. Given the importance of this parasite in terms of public health, further studies should be designed to understand the actual rate and kind of genotypes of T. gondii in other hosts and sources.
  31 in total

1.  Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in cattle, sheep and goats slaughtered for food in Mazandaran province, Iran, during 2005.

Authors:  M Sharif; Sh Gholami; H Ziaei; A Daryani; B Laktarashi; S P Ziapour; A Rafiei; M Vahedi
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 2.688

2.  Genetic diversity of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from chickens from Brazil.

Authors:  J P Dubey; G V Velmurugan; A Chockalingam; H F J Pena; L Nunes de Oliveira; C A Leifer; S M Gennari; L M G Bahia Oliveira; C Su
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.738

3.  Toxoplasmosis and Alzheimer: can Toxoplasma gondii really be introduced as a risk factor in etiology of Alzheimer?

Authors:  Mahmoud Mahami-Oskouei; Faezeh Hamidi; Mahnaz Talebi; Mehdi Farhoudi; Ali Akbar Taheraghdam; Tohid Kazemi; Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani; Esmaeil Fallah
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  A DNA fingerprinting method for individual characterization of Toxoplasma gondii strains: combination with isoenzymatic characters for determination of linkage groups.

Authors:  N Cristina; M L Dardé; C Boudin; G Tavernier; M Pestre-Alexandre; P Ambroise-Thomas
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Determination of genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii strains isolated from patients with toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  D K Howe; S Honoré; F Derouin; L D Sibley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Direct genotyping of animal and human isolates of Toxoplasma gondii from Colombia (South America).

Authors:  Carolina Gallego; Carlos Saavedra-Matiz; Jorge Enrique Gómez-Marín
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 3.112

7.  Genotypic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii strains associated with human toxoplasmosis in Spain: direct analysis from clinical samples.

Authors:  I Fuentes; J M Rubio; C Ramírez; J Alvar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Toxoplasma gondii infections in cats from Paraná, Brazil: seroprevalence, tissue distribution, and biologic and genetic characterization of isolates.

Authors:  J P Dubey; I T Navarro; C Sreekumar; E Dahl; R L Freire; H H Kawabata; M C B Vianna; O C H Kwok; S K Shen; P Thulliez; T Lehmann
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.276

9.  Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in commercial meat products as monitored by polymerase chain reaction--food for thought?

Authors:  Tanya V Aspinall; Damian Marlee; John E Hyde; Paul F G Sims
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.981

10.  Genotyping Characterization of Toxoplasma gondii in Cattle, Sheep, Goats and Swine from the North of Portugal.

Authors:  Ana Patrícia Lopes; Anabela Vilares; Francisco Neto; Alcina Rodrigues; Tânia Martins; Idalina Ferreira; Maria João Gargaté; Manuela Rodrigues; Luís Cardoso
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.012

View more
  8 in total

1.  Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in chickens in China during 1993-2021: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lan-Bi Nie; Qing-Long Gong; Qi Wang; Rui Zhang; Jun-Feng Shi; Yang Yang; Jian-Ming Li; Xing-Quan Zhu; Kun Shi; Rui Du
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii in chicken hearts from markets and retail stores in Northern Iran.

Authors:  Somayeh Abbaszadeh; Aref Teimouri; Mohammad Reza Mahmoudi; Zahra Atrkar Roushan; Nayereh Hajipour; Bijan Majidi-Shad; Meysam Sharifdini
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  The Correlation between Serum Levels of Anti-Toxoplasma gondii Antibodies and the Risk of Diabetes.

Authors:  Maryam Khalili; Mahmoud Mahami-Oskouei; Abbas Shahbazi; Abdolrasoul Safaiyan; Nader Mohammadzadeh-Gheshlaghi; Leyla Mahami-Oskouei
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.012

Review 4.  Molecular identification of Toxoplasma gondii in domesticated and broiler chickens (Gallus domesticus) that possibly augment the pool of human toxoplasmosis.

Authors:  Muhammad Bar Khan; Sanaullah Khan; Khair Rafiq; Shahid Niaz Khan; Sobia Attaullah; Ijaz Ali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Molecular Detection of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in Domestic Ducks in Hunan Province, China.

Authors:  Qiu-Yan Lv; He-Liang Zheng; Wen-He Yang; Guo-Hua Liu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 6.  A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Toxoplasmosis in Livestock and Poultry Worldwide.

Authors:  Bahador Hajimohammadi; Salman Ahmadian; Zohre Firoozi; Maryam Askari; Masoud Mohammadi; Gilda Eslami; Vahideh Askari; Elahe Loni; Raziyeh Barzegar-Bafrouei; Mohammad Javad Boozhmehrani
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.464

Review 7.  More Than Seventy Years of Research (1948-November 2021) on Toxoplasma gondii in Iran: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mitra Sadeghi; Seyed Abdollah Hosseini; Shahabeddin Sarvi; Tooran Nayeri; Mehdi Sharif; Abdol Sattar Pagheh; Afsaneh Amouei; Mahbobeh Montazeri; Ahmad Daryani
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.217

Review 8.  Toxoplasma gondii infection and toxoplasmosis in farm animals: Risk factors and economic impact.

Authors:  S Stelzer; W Basso; J Benavides Silván; L M Ortega-Mora; P Maksimov; J Gethmann; F J Conraths; G Schares
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2019-04-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.