| Literature DB >> 28761173 |
A Xu1, Y Zhang2, M Heydari Gharahcheshmeh2, Y Yao2, E Galstyan2, D Abraimov3, F Kametani3, A Polyanskii3, J Jaroszynski3, V Griffin3, G Majkic2, D C Larbalestier3, V Selvamanickam2.
Abstract
A main challenge that significantly impedes REBa2Cu3Ox (RE = rare earth) coated conductor applications is the low engineering critical current density J e because of the low superconductor fill factor in a complicated layered structure that is crucial for REBa2Cu3Ox to carry supercurrent. Recently, we have successfully achieved engineering critical current density beyond 2.0 kA/mm2 at 4.2 K and 16 T, by growing thick REBa2Cu3Ox layer, from ∼1.0 μm up to ∼3.2 μm, as well as controlling the pinning microstructure. Such high engineering critical current density, the highest value ever observed so far, establishes the essential role of REBa2Cu3Ox coated conductors for very high field magnet applications. We attribute such excellent performance to the dense c-axis self-assembled BaZrO3 nanorods, the elimination of large misoriented grains, and the suppression of big second phase particles in this ~3.2 μm thick REBa2Cu3Ox film.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28761173 PMCID: PMC5537340 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06881-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) GADDS 2D x-ray diffraction patterns from the ∼3.2 μm thick, 20% Zr-added REBCO film at χ = 90° to highlight the high quality crystallinity. (b) ω-scan to emphasize the out-of-plane texture. The inset of (b) is the pole figure of REBCO (103) peak. The sharp, four-fold symmetric peaks indicate a strong in-plane texture of REBCO matrix.
Figure 2(a) Low magnification cross-section TEM image viewed along the current-flowing direction. (b) High magnification cross section TEM image of the REBCO film grown in a pass. (c) High magnification cross section TEM image of the REBCO layer at the interface between two passes. (d) Back-scattered electron image of film cross section to emphasize the homogeneous microstructure and the absence of large misoriented grains and big second phase particles acting as current blocking effects. Occasional small second phase particles with size below 1 μm are observed. All cracks and scratches in (d) are from sample polishing.
Figure 3Magneto-optical microscope of the local trapped field after the sample cooled from room temperature in a 120 mT background field to (a) 10 K, (b) 40 K, (c) 60 K, and (d) 77 K. (e) Current stream lines calculated for (d) that illustrates the uniform current distribution in the film. (f) is the calculated J from the penetrated magnetic field after zero-field cooling according to Bean model. (a) to (e), especially the “rooftop” pattern in (d) suggest the electromagnetic homogeneity of the film. For all images, the brighter areas correspond to high trapped magnetic field regions.
Figure 4Field dependence of I normalized to 4 mm wide tape, and J at 4.2 K and magnetic fields up to 31.2 T. The ~3.2 μm thick film exhibits remarkable J > 1.0 kA/mm2 at magnetic fields up to 31.2 T. J was calculated based on the typical Hastelloy thickness of 50 μm and copper stabilizer thickness of 40 μm.
Figure 5Comparison of J (H||c) at 4.2 K and H up to 31.2 T of the ~3.2 μm thick, 20% Zr-added, and ~0.9 μm thick, 15% Zr-added REBCO film. The ~3.2 μm thick film shows not only lower J but also lower exponent for power-law field dependence of J , implying reduced effective current-carrying area and degraded BZO nanorod growth in the ~3.2 μm film. Further increase in J is expected by overcoming of these two issues.