| Literature DB >> 28761056 |
Bon Il Koo1, Yun-Soo Lee2, Mintae Seo1, Hyung Seok Choi1, Geok Leng Seah1, Taegu Nam2, Yoon Sung Nam3,4.
Abstract
Chemical biocides have been widely used as marine antifouling agents, but their environmental toxicity impose regulatory restriction on their use. Although various surrogate antifouling biocides have been introduced, their comparative effectiveness has not been well investigated partly due to the difficulty of quantitative evaluation of their antifouling activity. Here we report an image cytometric method to quantitatively analyze the antifouling activities of seven commercial biocides using Ulva prolifera as a target organism, which is known to be a dominant marine species causing soft fouling. The number of spores settled on a substrate is determined through image analysis using the intrinsic fluorescence of chlorophylls in the spores. Pre-determined sets of size and shape of spores allow for the precise determination of the number of settled spores. The effects of biocide concentration and combination of different biocides on the spore settlement are examined. No significant morphological changes of Ulva spores are observed, but the amount of adhesive pad materials is appreciably decreased in the presence of biocides. It is revealed that the growth rate of Ulva is not directly correlated with the antifouling activities against the settlement of Ulva spores. This work suggests that image cytometric analysis is a very convenient, fast-processable method to directly analyze the antifouling effects of biocides and coating materials.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28761056 PMCID: PMC5537363 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07362-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic illustration of image cytometric analysis to quantitatively determine the antifouling activity of biocides.
Figure 2Settlement efficiency of Ulva spores in natural seawater containing each biocide as a function of biocide concentration (n = 3). The values and standard deviations are presented in Supplementary Table 1.
Figure 3Settlement efficiency of Ulva spores in natural seawater containing a mixture of biocides. All of the p-values were < 0.001 between natural seawater and biocide solutions, while no significant difference was found between different biocides in (a and b) with n = 15. Some p-values below 0.01 (*) and 0.001 (**) with n = 15 are represented in (c). The error bars (standard deviations) and p-values in (d) are shown in Supplementary Figures 2–4 (n = 18).
Figure 4(a–c) SEM images of the surface of glass exposed to Ulva spore suspension in natural seawater without biocides under the summer condition for 24 h. (d) Schematic description of settlement process of Ulva spores. SEM images of the surface of glass exposed to Ulva spore suspension in natural seawater containing CuPT at concentrations of 10 ppb (e) and 100 ppb (f and g) under the summer condition for 24 h.
Figure 5(a) Fluorescence microscopy images of the Cy5-treated surface of glass exposed to Ulva spore suspension in natural seawater containing CuPT at various concentrations under the summer condition for 24 h. (b) Quantitative comparison of adhesive pad areas calculated from images in (a). (c) Spore settlement efficiency on the fresh and AP-coated glass surfaces exposed to Ulva spore suspension in natural seawater without biocides under the summer condition for 24 h. Some p-values below 0.05 (*) and 0.001 (**) with n = 18 or 19 are represented in (b and c).
Figure 6Ulva growth rate in natural seawater containing each biocide as a function of biocide concentration. The Ulva was incubated under the winter condition for one week. The error bars represent the standard deviations with n = 9.