Literature DB >> 28760939

Visit-to-Visit Office Blood Pressure Variability and Cardiovascular Outcomes in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).

Tara I Chang1, David M Reboussin1, Glenn M Chertow1, Alfred K Cheung1, William C Cushman1, William J Kostis1, Gianfranco Parati1, Dominic Raj1, Erik Riessen1, Brian Shapiro1, George S Stergiou1, Raymond R Townsend1, Konstantinos Tsioufis1, Paul K Whelton1, Jeffrey Whittle1, Jackson T Wright1, Vasilios Papademetriou2.   

Abstract

Studies of visit-to-visit office blood pressure (BP) variability (OBPV) as a predictor of cardiovascular events and death in high-risk patients treated to lower BP targets are lacking. We conducted a post hoc analysis of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), a well-characterized cohort of participants randomized to intensive (<120 mm Hg) or standard (<140 mm Hg) systolic BP targets. We defined OBPV as the coefficient of variation of the systolic BP using measurements taken during the 3-,6-, 9-, and 12-month study visits. In our cohort of 7879 participants, older age, female sex, black race, current smoking, chronic kidney disease, and coronary disease were independent determinants of higher OBPV. Use of thiazide-type diuretics or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers was associated with lower OBPV whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker use was associated with higher OBPV. There was no difference in OBPV in participants randomized to standard or intensive treatment groups. We found that OBPV had no significant associations with the composite end point of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events (n=324 primary end points; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.69, highest versus lowest quintile) nor with heart failure or stroke. The highest quintile of OBPV (versus lowest) was associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.92; confidence interval, 1.22-3.03) although the association of OBPV overall with all-cause mortality was marginal (P=0.07). Our results suggest that clinicians should continue to focus on office BP control rather than on OBPV unless definitive benefits of reducing OBPV are shown in prospective trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01206062.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; blood pressure; heart failure; kidney diseases; mortality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28760939      PMCID: PMC6209591          DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  24 in total

1.  The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Daichi Shimbo; Marcello Tonelli; Kristi Reynolds; Donna K Arnett; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Blood pressure variability: assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  The design and rationale of a multicenter clinical trial comparing two strategies for control of systolic blood pressure: the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).

Authors:  Walter T Ambrosius; Kaycee M Sink; Capri G Foy; Dan R Berlowitz; Alfred K Cheung; William C Cushman; Lawrence J Fine; David C Goff; Karen C Johnson; Anthony A Killeen; Cora E Lewis; Suzanne Oparil; David M Reboussin; Michael V Rocco; Joni K Snyder; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 4.  Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is a risk factor for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianqi Wang; Xubo Shi; Changsheng Ma; Hua Zheng; Jie Xiao; Hong Bian; Zhimin Ma; Ling Gong
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, carotid atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular events in the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Rita Facchetti; Gianfranco Parati; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Association between annual visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and stroke in postmenopausal women: data from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Daichi Shimbo; Jonathan D Newman; Aaron K Aragaki; Michael J LaMonte; Anthony A Bavry; Matthew Allison; JoAnn E Manson; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Visit-to-Visit Variability of Blood Pressure and Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, Heart Failure, and Mortality: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Jeff Whittle; Amy I Lynch; Lisandro D Colantonio; Lara M Simpson; Paula T Einhorn; Emily B Levitan; Paul K Whelton; William C Cushman; Gail T Louis; Barry R Davis; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Medication adherence and visit-to-visit variability of systolic blood pressure in African Americans with chronic kidney disease in the AASK trial.

Authors:  K Hong; P Muntner; I Kronish; D Shilane; T I Chang
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  Within-subject blood pressure level--not variability--predicts fatal and nonfatal outcomes in a general population.

Authors:  Rudolph Schutte; Lutgarde Thijs; Yan-Ping Liu; Kei Asayama; Yu Jin; Augustine Odili; Yu-Mei Gu; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Lotte Jacobs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  25 in total

1.  Effect of intensive lowering of systolic blood pressure treatment on heart failure events: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Mingming Liang; Chenyu Sun; Guangbo Qu; Tingting Shi; Min Min; Yile Wu; Yehuan Sun
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Blood Pressure Variability in CKD: Treatable or Hypertension's Homocysteine?

Authors:  Daniel Murphy; Paul E Drawz
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure Variability as Risk Factors for Adverse Events After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Cornelius M Dyke; Cecilia L Benz; Chani M Taggart; Marilyn G Klug; Marc D Basson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Preoperative outpatient blood pressure variability predicts postoperative mortality, readmission and morbidity after surgery.

Authors:  Marc D Basson; Marilyn G Klug; William E Newman; Cornelius Dyke
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events Among Community-Dwelling Elderly.

Authors:  Michael E Ernst; Enayet K Chowdhury; Lawrence J Beilin; Karen L Margolis; Mark R Nelson; Rory Wolfe; Andrew M Tonkin; Joanne Ryan; Robyn L Woods; John J McNeil; Christopher M Reid
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  Labile hypertension: a new disease or a variability phenomenon?

Authors:  Elias Sanidas; Charalampos Grassos; Dimitrios P Papadopoulos; Maria Velliou; Kostas Tsioufis; Marina Mantzourani; Despoina Perrea; Dimitrios Iliopoulos; John Barbetseas; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.012

7.  Integrated care of hypertension and HIV infection.

Authors:  Simona Lattanzi; Francesco Brigo; Mauro Silvestrini
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Response to Letter to the Editor concerning manuscript, "Blood pressure variability predicts adverse events and cardiovascular outcomes in sprint".

Authors:  Kenechukwu Mezue; Abhinav Goyal; Gregg S Pressman; Roy Matthew; Jay C Horrow; Janani Rangaswami
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Prognostic relevance of visit-to-visit office blood pressure variability in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: Same data, different conclusions?

Authors:  Tara I Chang; David M Reboussin; Glenn M Chertow; Alfred K Cheung; William C Cushman; William J Kostis; Gianfranco Parati; Erik Riessen; Brian Shapiro; George S Stergiou; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Paul K Whelton; Jeffrey Whittle; Jackson T Wright; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Association of Blood Pressure Variability and Diuretics With Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 1-5.

Authors:  L Parker Gregg; S Susan Hedayati; Hui Yang; Peter N Van Buren; Subhash Banerjee; Sankar D Navaneethan; Salim S Virani; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Carlos A Alvarez
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.