Literature DB >> 28760864

Reconfiguration of Brain Network Architectures between Resting-State and Complexity-Dependent Cognitive Reasoning.

Luke J Hearne1, Luca Cocchi2,3, Andrew Zalesky4, Jason B Mattingley2,5.   

Abstract

Our capacity for higher cognitive reasoning has a measurable limit. This limit is thought to arise from the brain's capacity to flexibly reconfigure interactions between spatially distributed networks. Recent work, however, has suggested that reconfigurations of task-related networks are modest when compared with intrinsic "resting-state" network architecture. Here we combined resting-state and task-driven functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine how flexible, task-specific reconfigurations associated with increasing reasoning demands are integrated within a stable intrinsic brain topology. Human participants (21 males and 28 females) underwent an initial resting-state scan, followed by a cognitive reasoning task involving different levels of complexity, followed by a second resting-state scan. The reasoning task required participants to deduce the identity of a missing element in a 4 × 4 matrix, and item difficulty was scaled parametrically as determined by relational complexity theory. Analyses revealed that external task engagement was characterized by a significant change in functional brain modules. Specifically, resting-state and null-task demand conditions were associated with more segregated brain-network topology, whereas increases in reasoning complexity resulted in merging of resting-state modules. Further increments in task complexity did not change the established modular architecture, but affected selective patterns of connectivity between frontoparietal, subcortical, cingulo-opercular, and default-mode networks. Larger increases in network efficiency within the newly established task modules were associated with higher reasoning accuracy. Our results shed light on the network architectures that underlie external task engagement, and highlight selective changes in brain connectivity supporting increases in task complexity.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans have clear limits in their ability to solve complex reasoning problems. It is thought that such limitations arise from flexible, moment-to-moment reconfigurations of functional brain networks. It is less clear how such task-driven adaptive changes in connectivity relate to stable, intrinsic networks of the brain and behavioral performance. We found that increased reasoning demands rely on selective patterns of connectivity within cortical networks that emerged in addition to a more general, task-induced modular architecture. This task-driven architecture reverted to a more segregated resting-state architecture both immediately before and after the task. These findings reveal how flexibility in human brain networks is integral to achieving successful reasoning performance across different levels of cognitive demand.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/378399-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complexity; connectivity; fMRI; modularity; network; reasoning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28760864      PMCID: PMC6596866          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0485-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  83 in total

1.  The Raven's progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time.

Authors:  J Raven
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: a parametric study of relational complexity.

Authors:  James K Kroger; Fred W Sabb; Christina L Fales; Susan Y Bookheimer; Mark S Cohen; Keith J Holyoak
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks.

Authors:  V Latora; M Marchiori
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-10-17       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning.

Authors:  K Christoff; V Prabhakaran; J Dorfman; Z Zhao; J K Kroger; K J Holyoak; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications.

Authors:  M E Newman; S H Strogatz; D J Watts
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2001-07-24

6.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman; M Girvan
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-02-26

7.  Measuring interregional functional connectivity using coherence and partial coherence analyses of fMRI data.

Authors:  Felice T Sun; Lee M Miller; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  A core system for the implementation of task sets.

Authors:  Nico U F Dosenbach; Kristina M Visscher; Erica D Palmer; Francis M Miezin; Kristin K Wenger; Hyunseon C Kang; E Darcy Burgund; Ansley L Grimes; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  How many variables can humans process?

Authors:  Graeme S Halford; Rosemary Baker; Julie E McCredden; John D Bain
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-01

Review 10.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.

Authors:  G S Halford; W H Wilson; S Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 12.579

View more
  47 in total

1.  Intrinsic Connectivity Patterns of Task-Defined Brain Networks Allow Individual Prediction of Cognitive Symptom Dimension of Schizophrenia and Are Linked to Molecular Architecture.

Authors:  Ji Chen; Veronika I Müller; Juergen Dukart; Felix Hoffstaedter; Justin T Baker; Avram J Holmes; Deniz Vatansever; Thomas Nickl-Jockschat; Xiaojin Liu; Birgit Derntl; Lydia Kogler; Renaud Jardri; Oliver Gruber; André Aleman; Iris E Sommer; Simon B Eickhoff; Kaustubh R Patil
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Dopamine depletion alters macroscopic network dynamics in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  James M Shine; Peter T Bell; Elie Matar; Russell A Poldrack; Simon J G Lewis; Glenda M Halliday; Claire O'Callaghan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Modulation of network-to-network connectivity via spike-timing-dependent noninvasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Emiliano Santarnecchi; Davide Momi; Giulia Sprugnoli; Francesco Neri; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Alessandro Rossi; Simone Rossi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Communication dynamics in complex brain networks.

Authors:  Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger; Bratislav Misic; Olaf Sporns
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Dynamic reorganization of the frontal parietal network during cognitive control and episodic memory.

Authors:  Kimberly L Ray; J Daniel Ragland; Angus W MacDonald; James M Gold; Steven M Silverstein; Deanna M Barch; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  Discovering the Computational Relevance of Brain Network Organization.

Authors:  Takuya Ito; Luke Hearne; Ravi Mill; Carrisa Cocuzza; Michael W Cole
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Thalamus is a common locus of reading, arithmetic, and IQ: Analysis of local intrinsic functional properties.

Authors:  Maki S Koyama; Peter J Molfese; Michael P Milham; W Einar Mencl; Kenneth R Pugh
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Connectivity patterns in cognitive control networks predict naturalistic multitasking ability.

Authors:  Tanya Wen; De-Cyuan Liu; Shulan Hsieh
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Oscillation-Based Connectivity Architecture Is Dominated by an Intrinsic Spatial Organization, Not Cognitive State or Frequency.

Authors:  Parham Mostame; Sepideh Sadaghiani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Task-induced activation transmitted by structural connectivity is associated with behavioral performance.

Authors:  Tianyi Yan; Tiantian Liu; Jing Ai; Zhongyan Shi; Jian Zhang; Guangying Pei; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.