Literature DB >> 28760856

Normal and Malignant Cells Exhibit Differential Responses to Calcium Electroporation.

Stine K Frandsen1,2, Mie B Krüger1, Uma M Mangalanathan1, Trine Tramm3, Faisal Mahmood1,4, Ivana Novak2, Julie Gehl5.   

Abstract

Calcium electroporation may offer a simple general tool for anticancer therapy. Transient permeabilization of cancer cell membranes created by applying short, high-voltage pulses in tumors enables high calcium influxes that trigger cell death. In this study, we compared the relative sensitivity of different human tumor models and normal tissues to calcium electroporation. Plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA) protein expression was confirmed in vitro in all cancer cell lines and normal primary dermal fibroblasts studied. In all tumor types tested in vivo, calcium electroporation effectively induced necrosis, with a range of sensitivities observed (36%-88%) 2 days after treatment. Necrosis was induced using calcium concentrations of 100-500 mmol/L and injection volumes 20%-80% of tumor volume. Notably, only limited effects were seen in normal tissue. Calcium content increased >7-fold in tumor and skin tissue after calcium electroporation but decreased in skin tissue 4 hours after treatment to levels comparable with untreated controls, whereas calcium content endured at high levels in tumor tissue. Mechanistic experiments in vitro indicated that calcium influx was similar in fibroblasts and cancer cells. However, we observed decreased PMCA expression in cancer cells compared with fibroblasts, offering a potential explanation for the different calcium content in tumor cells versus normal tissues. Overall, our results suggest that calcium electroporation can elicit a rapid and selective necrosis of solid tumors, with limited deleterious effects on surrounding normal tissues. Cancer Res; 77(16); 4389-401. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28760856     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  20 in total

1.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Exhibit Differential Sensitivity to Cardenolides from Calotropis gigantea.

Authors:  Petra J Pederson; Shengxin Cai; Chase Carver; Douglas R Powell; April L Risinger; Tanja Grkovic; Barry R O'Keefe; Susan L Mooberry; Robert H Cichewicz
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 2.  The Calcium-Signaling Toolkit in Cancer: Remodeling and Targeting.

Authors:  Sarah J Roberts-Thomson; Silke B Chalmers; Gregory R Monteith
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Calcium Electroporation Reduces Viability and Proliferation Capacity of Four Uveal Melanoma Cell Lines in 2D and 3D Cultures.

Authors:  Miriam M Kraemer; Theodora Tsimpaki; Utta Berchner-Pfannschmidt; Nikolaos E Bechrakis; Berthold Seitz; Miltiadis Fiorentzis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Calcium Electroporation for Keloids: A First-in-Man Phase I Study.

Authors:  Hanne Falk; Mille Vissing; Gitte Wooler; Julie Gehl
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.366

Review 5.  Recent Advances in Electrochemotherapy.

Authors:  Maja Cemazar; Gregor Sersa
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2019-12-12

6.  ESOPE-Equivalent Pulsing Protocols for Calcium Electroporation: An In Vitro Optimization Study on 2 Cancer Cell Models.

Authors:  Stefania Romeo; Anna Sannino; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; P Thomas Vernier; Ruggero Cadossi; Julie Gehl; Olga Zeni
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01

7.  Study protocol designed to investigate tumour response to calcium electroporation in cancers affecting the skin: a non-randomised phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Mille Vissing; John Ploen; Mascha Pervan; Kitt Vestergaard; Mazen Schnefeldt; Stine Krog Frandsen; Søren Rafael Rafaelsen; Christina Louise Lindhardt; Lars Henrik Jensen; Achim Rody; Julie Gehl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Calcium electroporation for treatment of sarcoma in preclinical studies.

Authors:  Stine Krog Frandsen; Julita Kulbacka; Anna Szewczyk; Julie Gehl; Malgorzata Daczewska; Jolanta Saczko
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-30

Review 9.  A Review on Differences in Effects on Normal and Malignant Cells and Tissues to Electroporation-Based Therapies: A Focus on Calcium Electroporation.

Authors:  Stine K Frandsen; Julie Gehl
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01

10.  Transport of charged small molecules after electropermeabilization - drift and diffusion.

Authors:  Esin B Sözer; C Florencia Pocetti; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  BMC Biophys       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.