D J Gould1, D Navaie2, E Purssell3, N S Drey4, S Creedon5. 1. School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Electronic address: gouldd@cardiff.ac.uk. 2. University Hospital Lewisham, London, UK. 3. King's College, London, UK. 4. City University, London, UK. 5. Cork University, Cork, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is considered to be the foremost infection prevention measure. How healthcare workers accept and make sense of the hand hygiene message is likely to contribute to the success and sustainability of initiatives to improve performance, which is often poor. METHODS: A survey of nurses in critical care units in three National Health Service trusts in England was undertaken to explore opinions about hand hygiene, use of alcohol hand rubs, audit with performance feedback, and other key hand-hygiene-related issues. Data were analysed descriptively and subjected to cluster analysis. RESULTS: Three main clusters of opinion were visualized, each forming a significant group: positive attitudes, pragmatism and scepticism. A smaller cluster suggested possible guilt about ability to perform hand hygiene. CONCLUSION: Cluster analysis identified previously unsuspected constellations of beliefs about hand hygiene that offer a plausible explanation for behaviour. Healthcare workers might respond to education and audit differently according to these beliefs. Those holding predominantly positive opinions might comply with hand hygiene policy and perform well as infection prevention link nurses and champions. Those holding pragmatic attitudes are likely to respond favourably to the need for professional behaviour and need to protect themselves from infection. Greater persuasion may be needed to encourage those who are sceptical about the importance of hand hygiene to comply with guidelines. Interventions to increase compliance should be sufficiently broad in scope to tackle different beliefs. Alternatively, cluster analysis of hand hygiene beliefs could be used to identify the most effective educational and monitoring strategies for a particular clinical setting.
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is considered to be the foremost infection prevention measure. How healthcare workers accept and make sense of the hand hygiene message is likely to contribute to the success and sustainability of initiatives to improve performance, which is often poor. METHODS: A survey of nurses in critical care units in three National Health Service trusts in England was undertaken to explore opinions about hand hygiene, use of alcohol hand rubs, audit with performance feedback, and other key hand-hygiene-related issues. Data were analysed descriptively and subjected to cluster analysis. RESULTS: Three main clusters of opinion were visualized, each forming a significant group: positive attitudes, pragmatism and scepticism. A smaller cluster suggested possible guilt about ability to perform hand hygiene. CONCLUSION: Cluster analysis identified previously unsuspected constellations of beliefs about hand hygiene that offer a plausible explanation for behaviour. Healthcare workers might respond to education and audit differently according to these beliefs. Those holding predominantly positive opinions might comply with hand hygiene policy and perform well as infection prevention link nurses and champions. Those holding pragmatic attitudes are likely to respond favourably to the need for professional behaviour and need to protect themselves from infection. Greater persuasion may be needed to encourage those who are sceptical about the importance of hand hygiene to comply with guidelines. Interventions to increase compliance should be sufficiently broad in scope to tackle different beliefs. Alternatively, cluster analysis of hand hygiene beliefs could be used to identify the most effective educational and monitoring strategies for a particular clinical setting.
Authors: Nicolas Calcagni; Anne-Gaëlle Venier; Raymond Nasso; Guillaume Broc; Eva Ardichen; Bruno Jarrige; Pierre Parneix; Bruno Quintard Journal: Infect Prev Pract Date: 2021-08-14
Authors: Tjallie van der Kooi; Hugo Sax; Hajo Grundmann; Didier Pittet; Sabine de Greeff; Jaap van Dissel; Lauren Clack; Albert W Wu; Judith Davitt; Sofia Kostourou; Alison Maguinness; Anna Michalik; Viorica Nedelcu; Márta Patyi; Janja Perme Hajdinjak; Milena Prosen; David Tellez; Éva Varga; Fani Veini; Mirosław Ziętkiewicz; Walter Zingg Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 6.454