Literature DB >> 28760581

Any nonadherence to instructions for use predicts graft-related adverse events in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair.

Christine R Herman1, Philippe Charbonneau2, Kiattisak Hongku2, Luc Dubois3, Sajjid Hossain3, Kevin Lee3, Oren K Steinmetz4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A variety of devices exist for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Device-specific instructions for use (IFU) detail anatomic constraints to application and deployment of devices and are developed from rigorous bench testing. Nonadherence to IFU occurs frequently to avoid open surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if IFU violations are associated with increased risk of graft-related adverse events (GRAEs) during follow-up.
METHODS: This multicenter retrospective observational study included patients undergoing elective endovascular repair for abdominal aneurysmal disease with three different devices. Demographics, anatomic data, and follow-up data were collected on patients from 2005 to 2014. IFU violations were device specific and included neck diameter, length, and angulation and iliac artery diameter and length. GRAEs included a composite outcome of reintervention, migration, endoleak (type II excluded), rupture, limb occlusion, sac growth, and aneurysm-related mortality during the follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed. Any IFU violations as well as neck-specific IFU violations were analyzed.
RESULTS: In 461 patients undergoing EVAR, 43.8% had at least one IFU violation. Patients with IFU violations were more likely to have peripheral vascular disease (12.4% vs 7.3%) and were less likely to be male (78.7% vs 90.3%). The most frequent IFU violations included diameter deviations of the neck (15.2%) and of the iliac artery (21.4%). Overall, the GRAE rate was 12.8%. Median follow-up time was 1.9 and 2.1 years for patients with and without an IFU violation, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival revealed a significant association between the presence of an IFU violation and GRAEs (log-rank, P = .031). When adjusted for clinical variable through Cox hazard modeling, the association remained significant (hazard ratio 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.1). When neck-specific violations were considered independently, Kaplan-Meier survival (log-rank, P = .003) and Cox modeling (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.0) revealed a significant association between neck-specific IFU violation and GRAEs.
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 43.8% of patients undergoing EVAR had a device-specific IFU violation, indicating that implanters are pushing the boundaries of device capabilities. Our study identified that any IFU violation was significantly associated with GRAEs over time. Caution should be applied to patients being considered for EVAR when IFU deviations exist.
Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28760581     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  8 in total

1.  Inferior Mid-term Durability with Comparable Survival for Younger Patients Undergoing Elective Endovascular Infrarenal versus Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Katherine M Reitz; Nathan L Liang; Bowen Xie; Michel Makaroun; Edith Tzeng
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.466

2.  Long-term Outcomes Associated With Open vs Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Medicare-Matched Database.

Authors:  Kevin Yei; Asma Mathlouthi; Isaac Naazie; Nadin Elsayed; Bryan Clary; Mahmoud Malas
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

3.  Comparison of Outcomes in Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair vs Open Surgical Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Konrad Salata; Mohamad A Hussain; Charles de Mestral; Elisa Greco; Badr A Aljabri; Muhammad Mamdani; Thomas L Forbes; Deepak L Bhatt; Subodh Verma; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-07-03

4.  Initial experience with polymer endovascular aneurysm repair using the Alto stent graft.

Authors:  Andrew Holden; Sean Lyden
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2020-02-01

5.  A Comparative Study on the Hemodynamic Performance Within Cross and Non-cross Stent-Grafts for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With an Angulated Neck.

Authors:  Ming Qing; Yue Qiu; Jiarong Wang; Tinghui Zheng; Ding Yuan
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Use of the AFX Stent Graft in Patients with Extremely Narrow Aortic Bifurcation: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  M U Wagenhäuser; N Floros; E Nikitina; J Mulorz; K M Balzer; S Goulas; M Petrich; P Dueppers; F Simon; H Schelzig; A Oberhuber
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2021-10-04

7.  A unique case of bilateral lower extremity post-endovascular aneurysm repair claudication.

Authors:  Rory J Loo; Arvind Srinivasan; Shahriar Alizadegan
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2020-10-21

8.  Outcomes after Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Octogenarians Compared to Younger Patients in Korea.

Authors:  Joon-Kee Park; Jihee Kang; Young-Wook Kim; Dong-Ik Kim; Seon-Hee Heo; Eunmi Gil; Shin-Young Woo; Yang-Jin Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.