B García-Medrano1, N Mesuro Domínguez2, Cl Simón Pérez3, M Garrosa García4, S Gayoso Del Villar2, A Mayo Íscar4, M J Gayoso Rodríguez2, M A Martín Ferrero3. 1. Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España. Electronic address: belengarciamedrano@gmail.com. 2. Departamento de Biología Celular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, España. 3. Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España. 4. Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Medicina de Valladolid, Valladolid, España.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: When a nerve section with a significant gap occurs, it is necessary to use a prosthesis to suture it. To date an autologous nerve segment graft appears to be the best treatment; but it has several important disadvantages. Our goal is to study the effectiveness of an isogenic acellular nerve prosthesis comparing a simple suture with tubulisation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Four groups of Wistar rats were used. The animals in Group 0 served as donors of nerve segments to graft. Group 1 received the implant with an end-to-end suture. In group 2, the implant was sutured inside an ɛ-caprolactone tube. Group 3 received it in a polylactic-co-glycolic acid tube. We evaluated the motor function (sciatic index and step test in motion), and the regeneration length by histological study of regeneration, after a maximum of 3 weeks. RESULTS: Regeneration was uneven in the three groups. In all groups, there were implants with regenerated nerve fibres at the maximum studied length (15mm) and others where regeneration was scarce. The mean regeneration length was greater in the direct end-to-end suture group (G1), although the regeneration speed was similar in the three groups. Group 1 showed the highest percentage of regeneration, but the variability of results prevents this difference reaching statistical significance. We found no significant differences between the two groups with polymer tubes. CONCLUSION: For the implantation of isogenic acellular nerve prosthesis, under our experimental conditions, the direct end-to-end suture was more effective than when it isprotected with biopolymer tubes.
INTRODUCTION: When a nerve section with a significant gap occurs, it is necessary to use a prosthesis to suture it. To date an autologous nerve segment graft appears to be the best treatment; but it has several important disadvantages. Our goal is to study the effectiveness of an isogenic acellular nerve prosthesis comparing a simple suture with tubulisation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Four groups of Wistar rats were used. The animals in Group 0 served as donors of nerve segments to graft. Group 1 received the implant with an end-to-end suture. In group 2, the implant was sutured inside an ɛ-caprolactone tube. Group 3 received it in a polylactic-co-glycolic acid tube. We evaluated the motor function (sciatic index and step test in motion), and the regeneration length by histological study of regeneration, after a maximum of 3 weeks. RESULTS: Regeneration was uneven in the three groups. In all groups, there were implants with regenerated nerve fibres at the maximum studied length (15mm) and others where regeneration was scarce. The mean regeneration length was greater in the direct end-to-end suture group (G1), although the regeneration speed was similar in the three groups. Group 1 showed the highest percentage of regeneration, but the variability of results prevents this difference reaching statistical significance. We found no significant differences between the two groups with polymer tubes. CONCLUSION: For the implantation of isogenic acellular nerve prosthesis, under our experimental conditions, the direct end-to-end suture was more effective than when it isprotected with biopolymer tubes.