Literature DB >> 28760396

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with new-generation devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marco Barbanti1, Sergio Buccheri2, Josep Rodés-Cabau3, Simona Gulino2, Philippe Généreux4, Gerlando Pilato2, Danny Dvir5, Andrea Picci2, Giuliano Costa2, Corrado Tamburino2, Martin B Leon6, John G Webb5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to conduct a weighted meta-analysis to determine the rates of acute (≤30days) major outcomes after (TAVR) with second-generation devices.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases from January 2011 to May 2017 was conducted using predefined criteria. New-generation TAVR devices were defined as any device which received CE mark approval or is still under evaluation for CE marking after CoreValve and SAPIEN XT prostheses.
RESULTS: A total of 37 studies including 10,822 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Devices investigated in the studies were the following: SAPIEN 3 (n=5423, 45.9%), Lotus Valve (n=3007, %), Portico (n=130, 1.1%), JenaValve (n=345, 2.9%), Symetis Acurate (n=1314, 11,1%), and Evolut R (n=1603, 13.6%). Thirty-day all-cause and cardiovascular 30-day death were 2.2% (95% CI: 1.6% to 2.8%) and 1.6% (95% CI: 0.9% to 2.3%), respectively; Any stroke and major/disabling stroke occurred at a pooled estimate rate of 2.6% (95% CI: 2.0% to 3.3%) and 0.9% (95% CI: 0.2% to 1.6%), respectively; life-threatening bleeding, 3.9% (95% CI: 2.9% to 5.0%); major vascular complications, 4.5% (95% CI: 3.7% to 5.4%); pacemaker implantation, 16.2% (95% CI: 12.7% to 19.6%); more than mild aortic regurgitation, 1.6% (95% CI: 0.9 to 2.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation TAVR devices are associated with very low mortality and major complications rates at 30-day, and improved prosthesis performance with <2% of patients having more than mild post-procedural aortic regurgitation. On the other hand, the need for pacemaker implantation seems to remain an unresolved issue, and warrants further investigation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Meta-analysis; Prosthetic heart valves; Systemic review; Transcatheter valve interventions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28760396     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  17 in total

Review 1.  Sedation versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Keita Sato; Philip M Jones
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  In-hospital outcomes comparison of transfemoral vs transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in propensity-matched cohorts with severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Rajkumar Doshi; Priyank Shah; Perwaiz M Meraj
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Network meta-analysis of new-generation valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Yosuke Hari; Kouki Nakashima; Toshiki Kuno; Tomo Ando
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Incidence of arrhythmias and impact of permanent pacemaker implantation in hospitalizations with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Rajkumar Doshi; Dean H Decter; Perwaiz Meraj
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with pure native aortic valve regurgitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdullah Haddad; Remy Arwani; Osama Altayar; Tarek Sawas; M Hassan Murad; Eduardo de Marchena
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Endocarditis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.

Authors:  Amgad Mentias; Saket Girotra; Milind Y Desai; Phillip A Horwitz; James D Rossen; Marwan Saad; Sidakpal Panaich; Samir Kapadia; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 11.195

7.  Transcatheter, sutureless and conventional aortic-valve replacement: a network meta-analysis of 16,432 patients.

Authors:  Declan Lloyd; Jessica G Y Luc; Ben Elias Indja; Vannessa Leung; Nelson Wang; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Ultrasound Guidance to Reduce Vascular and Bleeding Complications of Percutaneous Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.

Authors:  Flavien Vincent; Hugues Spillemaeker; Maéva Kyheng; Cassandre Belin-Vincent; Cédric Delhaye; Adeline Piérache; Tom Denimal; Basile Verdier; Nicolas Debry; Mouhamed Moussa; Guillaume Schurtz; Sina Porouchani; Alessandro Cosenza; Francis Juthier; Thibault Pamart; Marjorie Richardson; Augustin Coisne; Adrien Hertault; Jonathan Sobocinski; Thomas Modine; François Pontana; Alain Duhamel; Julien Labreuche; Eric Van Belle
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  Recent updates in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Jeonghwan Cho; Ung Kim
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2018-06-30

10.  Temporal Trends and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians.

Authors:  Amgad Mentias; Marwan Saad; Milind Y Desai; Phillip A Horwitz; James D Rossen; Sidakpal Panaich; Ayman Elbadawi; Abdul Qazi; Paul Sorajja; Hani Jneid; Samir Kapadia; Barry London; Mary S Vaughan Sarrazin
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.