Literature DB >> 28760055

Efficacy of caesarean scar defect repair in improving postmenstrual bleeding and factors associated with poor effect.

He-Yang Xu1, Meng-Yi Yang2, Xuyin Zhang1, Qing Wang3, Xiao-Fang Yi1, Jing-Xin Ding1, Ke-Qin Hua1.   

Abstract

Caesarean scar defect (CSD) can cause postmenstrual bleeding. Defect repair is an effective technique to improve this symptom, but there are still a few patients getting little improvement. This retrospective study evaluates the efficacy of scar repair and explores the factors associated with poor effect. In total, 123 patients were involved in the final analysis. All of them complained about menstruation period >7 days due to postmenstrual bleeding. Before surgery, 87.8% of patients had a menstruation period more than 10 days and 20.3% had a period more than 15 days. After surgery, a normal menstruation period (< =7 days) was achieved in 46.3% (95%CI 37.3%-55.6%) of patients and a menstruation period lasting no more than 10 days was achieved in 74.8% (95%CI 66.2%-82.2%). Through multivariate logistic analysis, four factors were found dependently associated with poor effect (defined as menstruation period >10 days after surgery): repeated caesarean section (OR 9.75, 95%CI 2.30-41.36, 0.002) was a risk factor, while defect volume >600 mm3 (OR 0.14, 95%CI 0.03-0.56, 0.006), interval from caesarean section to symptom emerging >3 months (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.07-0.94, 0.041) and straight or retroflexed uterus (OR 0.19, 95%CI 0.05-0.79, 0.022) were protective factors. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Caesarean scar defect can cause postmenstrual bleeding. Defect repair can improve this symptom, but there are still a few patients getting little improvement after surgery. What do the results of this study add? Defect volume >600 mm3, interval from caesarean section to symptom emerging >3 months and straight or retroflexed uterus are protective factors of poor effect (defined as menstruation period >10 days after surgery), and repeated caesarean section is a risk factor. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings may help in counselling the patients and in medical decision. Further researches are needed to explore other factors associated with surgical effect and build prediction models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean scar defect; abnormal uterine bleeding; laparoscopy; vaginal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28760055     DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1324833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  3 in total

1.  Vaginal repaired cesarean section diverticulum is beneficial in women with two prior cesarean sections.

Authors:  Yizhi Wang; Jiarui Li; Husheng Wang; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Niche-related outcomes after caesarean section and quality of life: a focus group study and review of literature.

Authors:  Sanne I Stegwee; Astrid Beij; Robert A de Leeuw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Lucet F van der Voet; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Association of Menstrual Extension and Surgery Effectiveness with Ultrasound Parameters of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticulum in Patients Undergoing Transvaginal Uterine Diverticulum Repair.

Authors:  Qing Yang; Min Ren; Xiaoli Lv; Fenghua Chen
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 4.711

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.