Literature DB >> 28758342

Carrion fly-derived DNA metabarcoding is an effective tool for mammal surveys: Evidence from a known tropical mammal community.

Torrey W Rodgers1,2, Charles C Y Xu3,4,5, Jacalyn Giacalone6, Karen M Kapheim2,7, Kristin Saltonstall2, Marta Vargas2, Douglas W Yu3,8, Panu Somervuo9, W Owen McMillan2, Patrick A Jansen2,10.   

Abstract

Metabarcoding of vertebrate DNA derived from carrion flies has been proposed as a promising tool for biodiversity monitoring. To evaluate its efficacy, we conducted metabarcoding surveys of carrion flies on Barro Colorado Island (BCI), Panama, which has a well-known mammal community, and compared our results against diurnal transect counts and camera trapping. We collected 1,084 flies in 29 sampling days, conducted metabarcoding with mammal-specific (16S) and vertebrate-specific (12S) primers, and sequenced amplicons on Illumina MiSeq. For taxonomic assignment, we compared blast with the new program protax, and we found that protax improved species identifications. We detected 20 mammal, four bird, and one lizard species from carrion fly metabarcoding, all but one of which are known from BCI. Fly metabarcoding detected more mammal species than concurrent transect counts (29 sampling days, 13 species) and concurrent camera trapping (84 sampling days, 17 species), and detected 67% of the number of mammal species documented by 8 years of transect counts and camera trapping combined, although fly metabarcoding missed several abundant species. This study demonstrates that carrion fly metabarcoding is a powerful tool for mammal biodiversity surveys and has the potential to detect a broader range of species than more commonly used methods.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barro Colorado Island; biodiversity; camera trapping; environmental DNA; transect counts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28758342     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  9 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies.

Authors:  Kristine Bohmann; Vasco Elbrecht; Christian Carøe; Iliana Bista; Florian Leese; Michael Bunce; Douglas W Yu; Mathew Seymour; Alex J Dumbrell; Simon Creer
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 8.678

2.  An efficient and robust laboratory workflow and tetrapod database for larger scale environmental DNA studies.

Authors:  Jan Axtner; Alex Crampton-Platt; Lisa A Hörig; Azlan Mohamed; Charles C Y Xu; Douglas W Yu; Andreas Wilting
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.524

3.  Female Blow Flies As Vertebrate Resource Indicators.

Authors:  Charity G Owings; Aniruddha Banerjee; Travis M D Asher; William P Gilhooly; Anais Tuceryan; Mary Huffine; Christine L Skaggs; Iyun M Adebowale; Nicholas E Manicke; Christine J Picard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Prospects and challenges of implementing DNA metabarcoding for high-throughput insect surveillance.

Authors:  Alexander M Piper; Jana Batovska; Noel O I Cogan; John Weiss; John Paul Cunningham; Brendan C Rodoni; Mark J Blacket
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.524

5.  Evaluating next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods for routine monitoring of wild bees: Metabarcoding, mitogenomics or NGS barcoding.

Authors:  Morgan Gueuning; Dominik Ganser; Simon Blaser; Matthias Albrecht; Eva Knop; Christophe Praz; Juerg E Frey
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Meta-analysis shows that environmental DNA outperforms traditional surveys, but warrants better reporting standards.

Authors:  Julija Fediajevaite; Victoria Priestley; Richard Arnold; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Blow fly stable isotopes reveal larval diet: A case study in community level anthropogenic effects.

Authors:  Charity G Owings; William P Gilhooly; Christine J Picard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring.

Authors:  Christina Lynggaard; Mads Frost Bertelsen; Casper V Jensen; Matthew S Johnson; Tobias Guldberg Frøslev; Morten Tange Olsen; Kristine Bohmann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Measuring protected-area effectiveness using vertebrate distributions from leech iDNA.

Authors:  Yinqiu Ji; Christopher C M Baker; Viorel D Popescu; Jiaxin Wang; Chunying Wu; Zhengyang Wang; Yuanheng Li; Lin Wang; Chaolang Hua; Zhongxing Yang; Chunyan Yang; Charles C Y Xu; Alex Diana; Qingzhong Wen; Naomi E Pierce; Douglas W Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 17.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.