Literature DB >> 28757719

Use of extracorporeal removal techniques in patients with paraquat toxicity and unknown hepatitis viral marker status.

Sayed Mahdi Marashi1, Hojatollah Raji2, Zeynab Nasri-Nasrabadi2, Mohammad Majidi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 28757719      PMCID: PMC5509169          DOI: 10.1016/j.tcmj.2015.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, Paraquat poisoning is a highly lethal toxicity despite advances in critical care and efforts in extracorporeal elimination [1]. After ingestion, paraquat is rapidly absorbed via the gastrointestinal tract and reaches peak plasma concentrations within the 1st hour. In many cases, by the time patients receive medical support; gastrointestinal decontamination is no longer possible. Afterward, paraquat is actively absorbed by most vital organs, and plasma concentration rapidly drops within about 4 hours [23]. This duration must be considered the optimal period to use extracorporeal elimination techniques. Fortunately, charcoal hemo- perfusion, and to a lesser extent hemodialysis, can help eliminate paraquat [2]. However, our experience indicates that most patients do not receive extracorporeal elimination during this period. Although charcoal hemoperfusion is the preferred method [2], it is not readily available, even in many tertiary care centers. To use this technique, a rapid patient transportation system is required. In contrast, hemodialysis can be used more readily in some secondary care settings, so it is a good choice in the golden period. However, some problems can be encountered. Although central venous access is easily attained, the unknown hepatitis viral marker status of a patient is a common barrier to emergency hemodialysis or charcoal hemoperfusion. It is necessary to prevent contamination of hemodialysis equipment by infected patients [4]. Because of the high mortality rate of paraquat toxicity and the necessity of removing considerable amounts of it from the bloodstream during the first hours, we propose that hemodialysis equipment be reserved for patients who are positive for hepatitis B surface antigen and also be used for these patients. Although there is a risk of nosocomial transmission of hepatitis B, this risk is not very high [5]. In addition, hepatitis B immunoglobulin can be used for protection immediately after the procedure if laboratory data indicate that the patient is not seropositive [6].
  4 in total

1.  Prevention of hepatitis B in hemodialysis patients using hepatitis B immunoglobulin. A controlled study.

Authors:  D Kleinknecht; A M Courouce; S Delons; C Naret; J P Adhemar; C Ciancioni; J Fermanian
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 0.975

2.  National surveillance of dialysis-associated diseases in the United States, 2002.

Authors:  Lyn Finelli; Jeremy T Miller; Jerome I Tokars; Miriam J Alter; Matthew J Arduino
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Patterns of hepatitis B prevalence and seroconversion in hemodialysis units from three continents: the DOPPS.

Authors:  Rachel A Burdick; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; John D Woods; Sara A Hedderwick; Kiyoshi Kurokawa; Christian Combe; Akira Saito; John LaBrecque; Friedrich K Port; Eric W Young
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 4.  Diagnostic and therapeutic approach for acute paraquat intoxication.

Authors:  Hyo-wook Gil; Jung-Rak Hong; Si-Hyong Jang; Sae-Yong Hong
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.