| Literature DB >> 28757507 |
Nana Ushine1, Tatsuo Sato2, Takuya Kato1, Shin-Ichi Hayama1.
Abstract
During the autumn migration of many waterfowls, body mass is lowest upon arrival at the wintering area and gradually increases during the winter. Consequently, body mass is highest before the spring migration. We studied the pattern of body mass changes in the Black-Headed Gull (Larus ridibundus) from December 2010 to December 2016 in the Shinhama area of Chiba, Japan. Based on 327 captured animals, body mass increased during the wintering period, but tended to decrease before migration. In 2014-2016, a muscle mass reduction in females was observed, explaining the change in body mass. However, the observed weight loss may be caused by many factors, which may be related to the migratory ecology of the regional population.Entities:
Keywords: Black-Headed Gull; Larus ridibundus; body mass change; migration; wintering period
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28757507 PMCID: PMC5627339 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.17-0099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Body mass of 327 Black-Headed Gulls over a 7-year period
| Arriving | Staying | Flying away | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | mass (g) | n | mass (g) | n | mass (g) | ||
| Age class | Adult | 134 | 278.5a (± 11.7) | 71 | 284.4b (± 10.7) | 91 | 269.3ab (± 15.0) |
| Yearling | 9 | 300.0 (± 35.8) | 11 | 292.9 (± 22.5) | 11 | 273.8 (± 12.3) | |
Summary of the capture number and average body mass (g) at each period. The same letter after a measurement indicates a significant difference (P<0.05). Age and body mass (± SD) are presented. There was no significant difference between Adult and Yearling in the wintering period, indicating that there was no difference in body mass depending on age.
Body mass of 136 Adult Black-Headed Gulls by sex
| Arriving | Staying | Flying away | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | mass (g) | n | mass (g) | n | mass (g) | ||
| Sex class | Male | 14 | 292.7ac (± 12.1) | 37 | 294.5bd (± 14.1) | 22 | 275.2ab (± 24.0) |
| Female | 14 | 265.0ce (± 14.0) | 26 | 268.8df (± 10.9) | 23 | 250.5fe (± 9.8) | |
Summary of the capture number and average body mass (g) at each period. The same letter after a measurement indicates a significant difference (P<0.05). From December 2014 to December 2016, 144 birds were identified sexing. Of 78 males and 66 females, 73 males and 63 females confirm a significant difference in body mass in “Arriving” and “Staying” period in each sex (P<0.05). Significant decrease was confirmed for each sex in “Arriving” and “Flying away”, “Staying” and “Flying away” (P<0.05).
Fig. 1.Details of sex, body mass, fat score and keel score for 136 adult birds samples from December 2014 to December 2016. In adult, 73 males and 63 females were observed, and 14 males and 14 females in the “Arriving” period, 37 males and 26 females in the “Staying” period, and 22 males and 23 females in the “Flying away” period were captured during the 2 years. The left panel summarizes body mass (g), the middle panel summarizes fat scores, and the right panel summarizes keel scores. The vertical lines indicate the standard deviation. Points with the same letter were significantly different (P<0.05). Both sexes showed significantly lower body masses in the “Flying away” period than in other periods. In both sexes, the muscle score changed significantly between “Arriving” and “Staying” and between “Staying” and “Flying away.” On the other hand, in females, the fat score was significantly decreased from “Staying” to “Flying away”.
Fig. 2.Results obtained for body mass, keel score and fat score with respect to molting during the “Flying away” period from December 2014 to December 2016. Analysis of body mass with respect to sex and molting status for 12 molted males, 10 pre-molt male, 8 molted females and 15 pre-molt females. The bar in the boxplots shows the average value, vertical lines were max and minimum value, and top and bottom end of box were average value ± SD. The same letter after measurements indicates a significant difference (P<0.05). Body mass was significantly decreased in each sex by molt, and keel score was too (P<0.05), whereas fat score was not decreased by molt (P>0.05).