Literature DB >> 28757308

Scheduling primary care appointments online: Differences in availability based on health insurance.

Gregory W Kurtzman1, Megha A Keshav2, Nikita P Satish3, Mitesh S Patel4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital platforms that allow patients to go online or use smartphone applications to view and schedule physician appointments have not been well evaluated.
METHODS: We conducted systematic searches for primary care physician appointments in 20 cities using ZocDoc, an online appointment scheduling platform. Availability was determined for three insurance types (self-pay, Medicare, and Medicaid) in states with and without Medicaid expansion. We collected data on physician characteristics, number of appointments available, and distance to clinics.
RESULTS: The sample comprised 4150 physician observations across 17 states. Overall, the mean distance to clinic was 8.9 miles (SD: 8.4 miles), mean total number of appointments available within 3 days for the 10 closest physicians was 20.1 (SD: 27.1), and the mean number of physicians available within 5 miles was 5.4 (SD: 6.6). There were no differences in physician characteristics by insurance type. Access to appointments did not differ between Medicare and self-pay. However, compared to self-pay, appointments for Medicaid were further away (Mean difference in miles: 5.4, P < 0.001), and there were fewer physicians available within 5 miles (Mean difference in # of physicians: -4.9, P < 0.001). States that did not adopt Medicaid expansion had fewer appointments within proximity, but this differed similarly across insurance types.
CONCLUSIONS: There were a substantial number of available appointments at close distances. However, Medicaid patients had less access to appointments within proximity than self-pay or Medicare patients.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Availability; Health insurance; Physician appointments; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28757308     DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc (Amst)        ISSN: 2213-0764


  5 in total

1.  Barriers and Facilitators to Automated Self-Scheduling: Consensus from a Delphi Panel of Key Stakeholders.

Authors:  Elizabeth Woodcock
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2022-01-01

Review 2.  Telehealth and Artificial Intelligence Insights into Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Dina M El-Sherif; Mohamed Abouzid; Mohamed Tarek Elzarif; Alhassan Ali Ahmed; Ashwag Albakri; Mohammed M Alshehri
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18

3.  Impact of Web-Based Self-Scheduling on Finalization of Well-Child Appointments in a Primary Care Setting: Retrospective Comparison Study.

Authors:  Frederick North; Elissa M Nelson; Rebecca J Majerus; Rebecca J Buss; Matthew C Thompson; Brian A Crum
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 4.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Automated Patient Self-scheduling for Health Care Organizations: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Woodcock
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Assimilation of Medical Appointment Scheduling Systems and Their Impact on the Accessibility of Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Guy Paré; Louis Raymond; Alexandre Castonguay; Antoine Grenier Ouimet; Marie-Claude Trudel
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-11-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.