OBJECTIVE: To present the use of buccal mucosal graft (BMG) in a salvage robotic laparoscopic pyeloplasty as an alternative in the management of a recurrent ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. METHODS: We present 2 patients with a recurrent UPJ obstruction who had previously undergone 2 prior open or robotic pyleoplasties, followed by endoscopic management. Preoperative imaging was obtained before surgical repair. The UPJ was incised and the incision extended to reveal margins of a healthy normal-caliber ureteral tissue. Single BMGs were harvested from the inner cheek of each patient. The grafts were of sufficient caliber and size to cover the entire defect as an onlay graft, and to maintain a tension-free and watertight anastomosis. RESULTS: The operative time was between 188 and 284 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 25-50 mL. The hospital stay was 2 days for each patient. Foley catheters were removed before discharge and the Jackson-Pratt drains were removed in the immediate postoperative period. The ureteral stents were removed at 6 and 9 weeks, with retrograde pyelograms confirming patency at the UPJ. Lasix renograms were obtained after 4 months and either demonstrated a resolution or were equivocal for obstruction, with a preservation of renal function. Both patients have been without complication since the stent removal. CONCLUSION: Robotic pyeloplasty with BMG is an alternative in the management of recurrent UPJ obstructions. Short-term follow-up has demonstrated that it is an effective and attractive approach compared with more extensive and invasive surgeries such as a renal autotransplant and an ileal ureter.
OBJECTIVE: To present the use of buccal mucosal graft (BMG) in a salvage robotic laparoscopic pyeloplasty as an alternative in the management of a recurrent ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. METHODS: We present 2 patients with a recurrent UPJ obstruction who had previously undergone 2 prior open or robotic pyleoplasties, followed by endoscopic management. Preoperative imaging was obtained before surgical repair. The UPJ was incised and the incision extended to reveal margins of a healthy normal-caliber ureteral tissue. Single BMGs were harvested from the inner cheek of each patient. The grafts were of sufficient caliber and size to cover the entire defect as an onlay graft, and to maintain a tension-free and watertight anastomosis. RESULTS: The operative time was between 188 and 284 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 25-50 mL. The hospital stay was 2 days for each patient. Foley catheters were removed before discharge and the Jackson-Pratt drains were removed in the immediate postoperative period. The ureteral stents were removed at 6 and 9 weeks, with retrograde pyelograms confirming patency at the UPJ. Lasix renograms were obtained after 4 months and either demonstrated a resolution or were equivocal for obstruction, with a preservation of renal function. Both patients have been without complication since the stent removal. CONCLUSION: Robotic pyeloplasty with BMG is an alternative in the management of recurrent UPJ obstructions. Short-term follow-up has demonstrated that it is an effective and attractive approach compared with more extensive and invasive surgeries such as a renal autotransplant and an ileal ureter.