M Alawy1, W Tawfick1, M ElKassaby1, A Shalaby2, M Zaki1, N Hynes3, S Sultan4. 1. Western Vascular Institute (WVI), Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway (UCHG), Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland. 2. Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, Galway (UCHG), Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland. 3. Department of Vascular Surgery, Galway Clinic, Doughiska, Galway, Ireland. 4. Western Vascular Institute (WVI), Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway (UCHG), Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Galway Clinic, Doughiska, Galway, Ireland. Electronic address: sherif.sultan@hse.ie.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyse the incidence and presentation of carotid patch inflammatory reactions following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: This was a cohort study using a prospectively maintained database. All patients who underwent elective CEA at a tertiary vascular centre between 2002 and 2016 were included. Computed tomography scan angiogram, duplex scan, and leucocyte scintigraphy were used to assess patients with suspected inflammatory patch complications. Re-intervention procedures and outcomes were noted. Histopathology and organisms cultured from the harvested material during re-intervention were assessed. RESULTS: During the study period, 633 patients underwent elective CEA. Fifty-one underwent eversion endarterectomy: 111 did not require a patch, whereas 471 patients had a patch repair. Four hundred and twenty eight had a Dacron patch repair and 43 a biological patch. Eight patients returned with late Dacron patch inflammatory complications (1.3% of all CEA and 1.9% of Dacron patch closures) after a period ranging from 18 months to 7 years (mean 4.1 ± 2.1 years). Seven of the eight patients underwent surgical re-intervention, and the eighth patient was deemed high surgical risk. One patient underwent a vein bypass, three had vein patch repair, one required internal carotid artery (ICA) ligation after patch excision, and two were managed by debridement, with omohyoid and sternomastoid muscle covering of the patch. The patient who required ICA ligation suffered a fatal stroke. The remaining patients had a satisfactory outcome. All patients showed evidence of foreign body reaction in pathological examination with no pathological organism cultured from swabs or tissue harvested during surgery. CONCLUSION: Late wound complications after CEA may be related to inflammatory reaction of the Dacron patch rather than infection. Infection should be excluded first. Reconstruction with vein is effective. However, debridement with sternomastoid and omohyoid muscle covering of the patch may be considered in high risk patients after exclusion of infection with regular follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyse the incidence and presentation of carotid patch inflammatory reactions following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: This was a cohort study using a prospectively maintained database. All patients who underwent elective CEA at a tertiary vascular centre between 2002 and 2016 were included. Computed tomography scan angiogram, duplex scan, and leucocyte scintigraphy were used to assess patients with suspected inflammatory patch complications. Re-intervention procedures and outcomes were noted. Histopathology and organisms cultured from the harvested material during re-intervention were assessed. RESULTS: During the study period, 633 patients underwent elective CEA. Fifty-one underwent eversion endarterectomy: 111 did not require a patch, whereas 471 patients had a patch repair. Four hundred and twenty eight had a Dacron patch repair and 43 a biological patch. Eight patients returned with late Dacron patch inflammatory complications (1.3% of all CEA and 1.9% of Dacron patch closures) after a period ranging from 18 months to 7 years (mean 4.1 ± 2.1 years). Seven of the eight patients underwent surgical re-intervention, and the eighthpatient was deemed high surgical risk. One patient underwent a vein bypass, three had vein patch repair, one required internal carotid artery (ICA) ligation after patch excision, and two were managed by debridement, with omohyoid and sternomastoid muscle covering of the patch. The patient who required ICA ligation suffered a fatal stroke. The remaining patients had a satisfactory outcome. All patients showed evidence of foreign body reaction in pathological examination with no pathological organism cultured from swabs or tissue harvested during surgery. CONCLUSION: Late wound complications after CEA may be related to inflammatory reaction of the Dacron patch rather than infection. Infection should be excluded first. Reconstruction with vein is effective. However, debridement with sternomastoid and omohyoid muscle covering of the patch may be considered in high risk patients after exclusion of infection with regular follow-up.
Authors: Ákos Bicsák; Dirk Jansen; Laurence Tack; Serguei Popov; Katja Swiadek; Olaf Struckmeier; Richard K Ellerkmann; Markus Winkler; Stefan Rohde; Stefan Hassfeld; Lars Bonitz Journal: Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2019-07-09