Literature DB >> 28756784

Factors associated with continued participation in a matched monetary incentive programme at local farmers' markets in low-income neighbourhoods in San Diego, California.

Amanda R Ratigan1, Suzanne Lindsay1, Hector Lemus1, Christina D Chambers2, Cheryl Am Anderson2, Terry A Cronan3, Deirdre K Browner4, Wilma J Wooten4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Farmers' Market Fresh Fund Incentive Program is a policy, systems and environmental intervention to improve access to fresh produce for participants on governmental assistance in the USA. The current study examined factors associated with ongoing participation in this matched monetary incentive programme.
DESIGN: Relationship of baseline factors with number of Fresh Fund visits was assessed using Poisson regression. Mixed-effects modelling was used to explore changes in consumption of fruits and vegetables and diet quality.
SETTING: San Diego, California.
SUBJECTS: Recipients of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) who attended participating farmers' markets from 2010 to 2012 (n 7298).
RESULTS: Among those with participation for ≤6 months, factors associated with increased visits included reporting more daily servings of fruits and vegetables (F&V) at baseline, being Vietnamese or Asian/Pacific Islander, and eligibility because of SNAP/CalFresh or SSI (v. WIC). Among those who came for 6-12 months, being Asian/Pacific Islander, eligibility because of SNAP/CalFresh and enrolling in the autumn, winter or spring were associated with a greater number of Fresh Fund visits. Among those who came for >12 months, being male and eligibility because of SSI were associated with a greater number of visits. Overall, the odds of increasing number of servings of F&V consumed increased by 2 % per month, and the odds of improved perception of diet quality increased by 10 % per month.
CONCLUSIONS: Sustaining and increasing Fresh Fund-type programme operations should be a top priority for future policy decisions concerning farmers' market use in low-income neighbourhoods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  systems and environmental; Farmers’ markets; Fruits and vegetables; Government nutrition assistance; Matched monetary incentives; Policy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28756784     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017001549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  5 in total

1.  A Qualitative Evaluation of Double Up Food Bucks Farmers' Market Incentive Program Access.

Authors:  Jennifer A Garner; Casey Coombs; Mateja R Savoie-Roskos; Carrie Durward; Rebecca A Seguin-Fowler
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  Comparison of Fruit and Vegetable Prices between Farmers' Markets and Supermarkets: Implications for Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Food Assistance Program Participants.

Authors:  Sridharshi C Hewawitharana; Karen L Webb; Ron Strochlic; Wendi Gosliner
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  The California Nutrition Incentive Program: Participants' Perceptions and Associations with Produce Purchases, Consumption, and Food Security.

Authors:  Wendi Gosliner; Sridharshi C Hewawitharana; Ron Strochlic; Celeste Felix; Caroline Long
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 4.  Partnerships and Community Engagement Key to Policy, Systems, and Environmental Achievements for Healthy Eating and Active Living: a Systematic Mapping Review.

Authors:  Leslie Cunningham-Sabo; Angela Tagtow; Sirui Mi; Jessa Engelken; Kiaya Johnston; Dena R Herman
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Scoping Review of Program Structure.

Authors:  Katherine Engel; Elizabeth H Ruder
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.