Literature DB >> 28756780

AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE ON THE ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGIES: INTEGRATE-HTA.

Philip Wahlster1, Louise Brereton2, Jacob Burns3, Björn Hofmann4, Kati Mozygemba1, Wija Oortwijn5, Lisa Pfadenhauer3, Stephanie Polus3, Eva Rehfuess3, Imke Schilling1, Gert Jan van der Wilt6, Ansgar Gerhardus1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Current health technology assessment (HTA) is not well equipped to assess complex technologies as insufficient attention is being paid to the diversity in patient characteristics and preferences, context, and implementation. Strategies to integrate these and several other aspects, such as ethical considerations, in a comprehensive assessment are missing. The aim of the European research project INTEGRATE-HTA was to develop a model for an integrated HTA of complex technologies.
METHODS: A multi-method, four-stage approach guided the development of the INTEGRATE-HTA Model: (i) definition of the different dimensions of information to be integrated, (ii) literature review of existing methods for integration, (iii) adjustment of concepts and methods for assessing distinct aspects of complex technologies in the frame of an integrated process, and (iv) application of the model in a case study and subsequent revisions.
RESULTS: The INTEGRATE-HTA Model consists of five steps, each involving stakeholders: (i) definition of the technology and the objective of the HTA; (ii) development of a logic model to provide a structured overview of the technology and the system in which it is embedded; (iii) evidence assessment on effectiveness, economic, ethical, legal, and socio-cultural aspects, taking variability of participants, context, implementation issues, and their interactions into account; (iv) populating the logic model with the data generated in step 3; (v) structured process of decision-making.
CONCLUSIONS: The INTEGRATE-HTA Model provides a structured process for integrated HTAs of complex technologies. Stakeholder involvement in all steps is essential as a means of ensuring relevance and meaningful interpretation of the evidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex interventions; Decision making; Health technology assessment; Logic model; Stakeholder involvement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28756780     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462317000484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation frameworks for digital nursing technologies: analysis, assessment, and guidance. An overview of the literature.

Authors:  Tobias Krick
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2021-08-17

2.  Impact of Socioeconomic Differences on Distributional Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Colin Angus; Ana Duarte; Duncan Gillespie; Simon Walker; Susan Griffin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.583

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.