T Wanandy1,2,3,4, H E Dwyer1, L McLean1, N W Davies5, D Nichols5, N Gueven4, S G A Brown1,3,6,7, M D Wiese1,8. 1. Jack Jumper Allergy Program, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tas., Australia. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tas., Australia. 3. School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia. 4. Division of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia. 5. Central Science Laboratory, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia. 6. Ambulance Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia. 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tas., Australia. 8. School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy uses pharmaceutical preparations derived from naturally occurring source materials, which contain water-soluble allergenic components responsible for allergic reactions. The success of in vivo and in vitro diagnoses in allergen sensitization and allergen immunotherapy largely depends on the quality, composition and uniformity of allergenic materials used to produce the active ingredients, and the formulation employed to prepare finished products. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the factors influencing batch-to-batch consistency of Jack Jumper (Myrmecia pilosula) ant venom (JJAV) in the form of active pharmaceutical ingredient (AI) and informed whether factors such as temperature, artificial light and container materials influence the quality of JJAV AIs. We also aimed to establish handling and storage requirements of JJAV AIs to ensure preservation of allergenic activities during usage in the diagnosis of allergen sensitization and in allergen immunotherapy. METHODS: The quality and consistency of JJAV AIs were analysed using a combination of bicinchoninic acid assay for total protein quantification, HPLC-UV for JJAV allergen peptides quantification, ELISA inhibition for total allergenic potency, SDS-PAGE, AU-PAGE and immunoblot for qualitative assessment of JJAV components, and Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay for the quantification of endotoxin concentration. API-ZYM and Zymogram assays were used to probe the presence of enzymatic activities in JJAV. RESULTS: Pharmaceutical-grade JJAV for allergen immunotherapy has good batch-to-batch consistency. Temporary storage at 4°C and light exposure do not affect the quality of JJAV. Exposure to temperature above 40°C degrades high MW allergens in JJAV. Vials containing JJAV must be stored frozen and in upright position during long-term storage. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We have identified factors, which can influence the quality and consistency of JJAV AIs, and provided a framework for appropriate handling, transporting and storage of JJAV to be used for the diagnosis of allergen sensitization and in AIT.
BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy uses pharmaceutical preparations derived from naturally occurring source materials, which contain water-soluble allergenic components responsible for allergic reactions. The success of in vivo and in vitro diagnoses in allergen sensitization and allergen immunotherapy largely depends on the quality, composition and uniformity of allergenic materials used to produce the active ingredients, and the formulation employed to prepare finished products. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the factors influencing batch-to-batch consistency of Jack Jumper (Myrmecia pilosula) ant venom (JJAV) in the form of active pharmaceutical ingredient (AI) and informed whether factors such as temperature, artificial light and container materials influence the quality of JJAV AIs. We also aimed to establish handling and storage requirements of JJAV AIs to ensure preservation of allergenic activities during usage in the diagnosis of allergen sensitization and in allergen immunotherapy. METHODS: The quality and consistency of JJAV AIs were analysed using a combination of bicinchoninic acid assay for total protein quantification, HPLC-UV for JJAV allergen peptides quantification, ELISA inhibition for total allergenic potency, SDS-PAGE, AU-PAGE and immunoblot for qualitative assessment of JJAV components, and Limulus Amebocyte Lysate assay for the quantification of endotoxin concentration. API-ZYM and Zymogram assays were used to probe the presence of enzymatic activities in JJAV. RESULTS: Pharmaceutical-grade JJAV for allergen immunotherapy has good batch-to-batch consistency. Temporary storage at 4°C and light exposure do not affect the quality of JJAV. Exposure to temperature above 40°C degrades high MW allergens in JJAV. Vials containing JJAV must be stored frozen and in upright position during long-term storage. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We have identified factors, which can influence the quality and consistency of JJAV AIs, and provided a framework for appropriate handling, transporting and storage of JJAV to be used for the diagnosis of allergen sensitization and in AIT.
Authors: Troy Wanandy; Yoshikazu Honda-Okubo; Noel W Davies; Hayley E Rose; Robert J Heddle; Simon G A Brown; Richard J Woodman; Nikolai Petrovsky; Michael D Wiese Journal: J Pharm Biomed Anal Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.935
Authors: Troy Wanandy; Emily Mulcahy; Wun Yee Lau; Simon G A Brown; Michael D Wiese Journal: Clin Rev Allergy Immunol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 8.667