Allyson C Espinal1, Matthew F Buas2, Dan Wang3, David Ting-Yuan Cheng2,4, Lara Sucheston-Campbell5, Qiang Hu3, Li Yan3, Rochelle Payne-Ondracek2, Eduardo Cortes3, Li Tang2, Zhihong Gong2, Gary Zirpoli2,6, Thaer Khoury7, Song Yao2, Angela Omilian7, Kitaw Demissie8, Elisa V Bandera9, Song Liu3, Christine B Ambrosone10, Michael J Higgins11. 1. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA. 2. Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA. 4. Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 5. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. 6. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Department of Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NJ, USA. 8. Department of Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health and Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Jersey, USA. 9. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 10. Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA. Christine.ambrosone@roswellpark.org. 11. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA. Michael.higgins@roswellpark.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reproductive factors, particularly parity, have differential effects on breast cancer risk according to estrogen receptor (ER) status, especially among African American (AA) women. One mechanism could be through DNA methylation, leading to altered expression levels of genes important in cell fate decisions. METHODS: Using the Illumina 450K BeadChip, we compared DNA methylation levels in paraffin-archived tumor samples from 383 AA and 350 European American (EA) women in the Women's Circle of Health Study (WCHS). We combined 450K profiles with RNA-seq data and prioritized genes based on differential methylation by race, correlation between methylation and gene expression, and biological function. We measured tumor protein expression and assessed its relationship to DNA methylation. We evaluated associations between reproductive characteristics and DNA methylation using linear regression. RESULTS: 410 loci were differentially methylated by race, with the majority unique to ER- tumors. FOXA1 was hypermethylated in tumors from AA versus EA women with ER- cancer, and increased DNA methylation correlated with reduced RNA and protein expression. Importantly, parity was positively associated with FOXA1 methylation among AA women with ER- tumors (P = 0.022), as was number of births (P = 0.026), particularly among those who did not breastfeed (P = 0.008). These same relationships were not observed among EA women, although statistical power was more limited. CONCLUSIONS: Methylation and expression of FOXA1 is likely impacted by parity and breastfeeding. Because FOXA1 regulates a luminal gene expression signature in progenitor cells and represses the basal phenotype, this could be a mechanism that links these reproductive exposures with ER- breast cancer.
BACKGROUND: Reproductive factors, particularly parity, have differential effects on breast cancer risk according to estrogen receptor (ER) status, especially among African American (AA) women. One mechanism could be through DNA methylation, leading to altered expression levels of genes important in cell fate decisions. METHODS: Using the Illumina 450K BeadChip, we compared DNA methylation levels in paraffin-archived tumor samples from 383 AA and 350 European American (EA) women in the Women's Circle of Health Study (WCHS). We combined 450K profiles with RNA-seq data and prioritized genes based on differential methylation by race, correlation between methylation and gene expression, and biological function. We measured tumor protein expression and assessed its relationship to DNA methylation. We evaluated associations between reproductive characteristics and DNA methylation using linear regression. RESULTS: 410 loci were differentially methylated by race, with the majority unique to ER- tumors. FOXA1 was hypermethylated in tumors from AA versus EA women with ER- cancer, and increased DNA methylation correlated with reduced RNA and protein expression. Importantly, parity was positively associated with FOXA1 methylation among AA women with ER- tumors (P = 0.022), as was number of births (P = 0.026), particularly among those who did not breastfeed (P = 0.008). These same relationships were not observed among EA women, although statistical power was more limited. CONCLUSIONS: Methylation and expression of FOXA1 is likely impacted by parity and breastfeeding. Because FOXA1 regulates a luminal gene expression signature in progenitor cells and represses the basal phenotype, this could be a mechanism that links these reproductive exposures with ER- breast cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American; Breast cancer; DNA methylation; Disparities; ER− breast cancer; FOXA1
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Paul A Bunn; Michael V Di Maria; Robert Veve; Roy M Bremmes; Anna E Barón; Chan Zeng; Wilbur A Franklin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Li Yan; Changxing Ma; Dan Wang; Qiang Hu; Maochun Qin; Jeffrey M Conroy; Lara E Sucheston; Christine B Ambrosone; Candace S Johnson; Jianmin Wang; Song Liu Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Christine B Ambrosone; Gregory L Ciupak; Elisa V Bandera; Lina Jandorf; Dana H Bovbjerg; Gary Zirpoli; Karen Pawlish; James Godbold; Helena Furberg; Anne Fatone; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Song Yao; Yulin Li; Helena Hwang; Warren Davis; Michelle Roberts; Lara Sucheston; Kitaw Demissie; Kandace L Amend; Paul Tartter; James Reilly; Benjamin W Pace; Thomas Rohan; Joseph Sparano; George Raptis; Maria Castaldi; Alison Estabrook; Sheldon Feldman; Christina Weltz; Margaret Kemeny Journal: J Oncol Date: 2009-10-25 Impact factor: 4.375
Authors: M E Work; E M John; I L Andrulis; J A Knight; Y Liao; A M Mulligan; M C Southey; G G Giles; G S Dite; C Apicella; H Hibshoosh; J L Hopper; M B Terry Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Song Yao; Angela R Omilian; Thaer Khoury; Matthew F Buas; Rochelle Payne-Ondracek; Sirinapa Sribenja; Wiam Bshara; Chi-Chen Hong; Elisa V Bandera; Warren Davis; Michael J Higgins; Christine B Ambrosone Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Vasty Osei-Amponsa; Jenna M Buckwalter; Lauren Shuman; Zongyu Zheng; Hironobu Yamashita; Vonn Walter; Thomas Wildermuth; Justine Ellis-Mohl; Chang Liu; Joshua I Warrick; Lisa M Shantz; Robert P Feehan; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Cathy Mendelsohn; Jay D Raman; Klaus H Kaestner; Xue-Ru Wu; David J DeGraff Journal: Oncogene Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Jung S Byun; Sandeep K Singhal; Samson Park; Dae Ik Yi; Tingfen Yan; Ambar Caban; Alana Jones; Partha Mukhopadhyay; Sara M Gil; Stephen M Hewitt; Lisa Newman; Melissa B Davis; Brittany D Jenkins; Jorge L Sepulveda; Adriana De Siervi; Anna María Nápoles; Nasreen A Vohra; Kevin Gardner Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Zhihong Gong; Jie Wang; Dan Wang; Matthew F Buas; Xuefeng Ren; Jo L Freudenheim; Steven A Belinsky; Song Liu; Christine B Ambrosone; Michael J Higgins Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Peter T Campbell; Christine B Ambrosone; Timothy R Rebbeck; Shuji Ogino; Reiko Nishihara; Hugo J W L Aerts; Melissa Bondy; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Marios Giannakis; Jeffrey A Golden; Yujing J Heng; N Sertac Kip; Jill Koshiol; X Shirley Liu; Camila M Lopes-Ramos; Lorelei A Mucci; Jonathan A Nowak; Amanda I Phipps; John Quackenbush; Robert E Schoen; Lynette M Sholl; Rulla M Tamimi; Molin Wang; Matty P Weijenberg; Catherine J Wu; Kana Wu; Song Yao; Kun-Hsing Yu; Xuehong Zhang Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-05-08 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Padmashree Rida; Angela Ogden; Ian O Ellis; Zsuzsanna Varga; Antonio C Wolff; Tiffany A Traina; Christos Hatzis; Julie R Palmer; Christine B Ambrosone; Brian D Lehmann; Rita Nanda; Valerie Montgomery Rice; Otis W Brawley; Mylin A Torres; Emad Rakha; Ritu Aneja Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Sirinapa Sribenja; Orla Maguire; Kristopher Attwood; Matthew F Buas; Julie R Palmer; Christine B Ambrosone; Michael J Higgins Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Lucas A Salas; Lauren C Peres; Zaneta M Thayer; Rick Wa Smith; Yichen Guo; Wonil Chung; Jiahui Si; Liming Liang Journal: Epigenomics Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 4.778
Authors: Yara Abdou; Kristopher Attwood; Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Song Yao; Elisa V Bandera; Gary R Zirpoli; Rochelle Payne Ondracek; Leighton Stein; Wiam Bshara; Thaer Khoury; Christine B Ambrosone; Angela R Omilian Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 6.466