Literature DB >> 28756221

The public health significance of latrines discharging to groundwater used for drinking.

P Ravenscroft1, Z H Mahmud2, M Shafiqul Islam2, A K M Z Hossain2, A Zahid3, G C Saha4, A H M Zulfiquar Ali5, Khairul Islam6, S Cairncross7, J D Clemens2, M Sirajul Islam8.   

Abstract

Faecal contamination of groundwater from pit latrines is widely perceived as a major threat to the safety of drinking water for several billion people in rural and peri-urban areas worldwide. On the floodplains of the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna delta in Bangladesh, we constructed latrines and monitored piezometer nests monthly for two years. We detected faecal coliforms (FC) in 3.3-23.3% of samples at four sites. We differentiate a near-field, characterised by high concentrations and frequent, persistent and contiguous contamination in all directions, and a far-field characterised by rare, impersistent, discontinuous low-level detections in variable directions. Far-field FC concentrations at four sites exceeded 0 and 10 cfu/100 ml in 2.4-9.6% and 0.2-2.3% of sampling events respectively. The lesser contamination of in-situ groundwater compared to water at the point-of-collection from domestic wells, which itself is less contaminated than at the point-of-consumption, demonstrates the importance of recontamination in the well-pump system. We present a conceptual model comprising four sub-pathways: the latrine-aquifer interface (near-field); groundwater flowing from latrine to well (far-field); the well-pump system; and post-collection handling and storage. Applying a hypothetical dose-response model suggests that 1-2% of the diarrhoeal disease burden from drinking water is derived from the aquifer, 29% from the well-pump system, and 70% from post-collection handling. The important implications are (i) that leakage from pit latrines is a minor contributor to faecal contamination of drinking water in alluvial-deltaic terrains; (ii) fears of increased groundwater pollution should not constrain expanding latrine coverage, and (iii) that more attention should be given to reducing contamination around the well-head.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bangladesh; Drinking water; Faecal coliforms; Groundwater pollution; Latrines; Risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28756221     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  2 in total

1.  Microbial Groundwater Quality Status of Hand-Dug Wells and Boreholes in the Dodowa Area of Ghana.

Authors:  George Lutterodt; Jack van de Vossenberg; Yvonne Hoiting; Alimamy K Kamara; Sampson Oduro-Kwarteng; Jan Willem A Foppen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Do Sanitation Improvements Reduce Fecal Contamination of Water, Hands, Food, Soil, and Flies? Evidence from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Ayse Ercumen; Amy J Pickering; Laura H Kwong; Andrew Mertens; Benjamin F Arnold; Jade Benjamin-Chung; Alan E Hubbard; Mahfuja Alam; Debashis Sen; Sharmin Islam; Md Zahidur Rahman; Craig Kullmann; Claire Chase; Rokeya Ahmed; Sarker Masud Parvez; Leanne Unicomb; Mahbubur Rahman; Pavani K Ram; Thomas Clasen; Stephen P Luby; John M Colford
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 9.028

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.