Nirmal S Sharma1, Keith M Wille1, S Athira2, Degui Zhi3, Kenneth P Hough1, Enrique Diaz-Guzman1, Kui Zhang3, Ranjit Kumar4, Sunad Rangarajan1, Peter Eipers5, Yong Wang1, Ritesh K Srivastava6, Jose Vicente Rodriguez Dager1, Mohammad Athar6, Casey Morrow5, Charles W Hoopes7, David D Chaplin6, Victor J Thannickal1, Jessy S Deshane8. 1. Division of Pulmonary Allergy & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 2. Cognub Decision Solutions, Kerala, India. 3. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 4. Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 5. Division of Cell Developmental and Integrative Biology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 6. Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 7. Division of Surgery, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 8. Division of Pulmonary Allergy & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. Electronic address: treena@uab.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term survival of lung transplant recipients (LTRs) is limited by the occurrence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Recent evidence suggests a role for microbiome alterations in the occurrence of BOS, although the precise mechanisms are unclear. In this study we evaluated the relationship between the airway microbiome and distinct subsets of immunoregulatory myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in LTRs. METHODS: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and simultaneous oral wash and nasal swab samples were collected from adult LTRs. Microbial genomic DNA was isolated, 16S rRNA genes amplified using V4 primers, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products sequenced and analyzed. BAL MDSC subsets were enumerated using flow cytometry. RESULTS: The oral microbiome signature differs from that of the nasal, proximal and distal airway microbiomes, whereas the nasal microbiome is closer to the airway microbiome. Proximal and distal airway microbiome signatures of individual subjects are distinct. We identified phenotypic subsets of MDSCs in BAL, with a higher proportion of immunosuppressive MDSCs in the proximal airways, in contrast to a preponderance of pro-inflammatory MDSCs in distal airways. Relative abundance of distinct bacterial phyla in proximal and distal airways correlated with particular airway MDSCs. Expression of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP)-homologous protein (CHOP), an endoplasmic (ER) stress sensor, was increased in immunosuppressive MDSCs when compared with pro-inflammatory MDSCs. CONCLUSIONS: The nasal microbiome closely resembles the microbiome of the proximal and distal airways in LTRs. The association of distinct microbial communities with airway MDSCs suggests a functional relationship between the local microbiome and MDSC phenotype, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of BOS.
BACKGROUND: Long-term survival of lung transplant recipients (LTRs) is limited by the occurrence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Recent evidence suggests a role for microbiome alterations in the occurrence of BOS, although the precise mechanisms are unclear. In this study we evaluated the relationship between the airway microbiome and distinct subsets of immunoregulatory myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in LTRs. METHODS: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and simultaneous oral wash and nasal swab samples were collected from adult LTRs. Microbial genomic DNA was isolated, 16S rRNA genes amplified using V4 primers, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products sequenced and analyzed. BAL MDSC subsets were enumerated using flow cytometry. RESULTS: The oral microbiome signature differs from that of the nasal, proximal and distal airway microbiomes, whereas the nasal microbiome is closer to the airway microbiome. Proximal and distal airway microbiome signatures of individual subjects are distinct. We identified phenotypic subsets of MDSCs in BAL, with a higher proportion of immunosuppressive MDSCs in the proximal airways, in contrast to a preponderance of pro-inflammatory MDSCs in distal airways. Relative abundance of distinct bacterial phyla in proximal and distal airways correlated with particular airway MDSCs. Expression of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP)-homologous protein (CHOP), an endoplasmic (ER) stress sensor, was increased in immunosuppressive MDSCs when compared with pro-inflammatory MDSCs. CONCLUSIONS: The nasal microbiome closely resembles the microbiome of the proximal and distal airways in LTRs. The association of distinct microbial communities with airway MDSCs suggests a functional relationship between the local microbiome and MDSC phenotype, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of BOS.
Authors: Marc Estenne; Janet R Maurer; Annette Boehler; James J Egan; Adaani Frost; Marshall Hertz; George B Mallory; Gregory I Snell; Samuel Yousem Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Christopher M Burton; Jørn Carlsen; Jann Mortensen; Claus B Andersen; Nils Milman; Martin Iversen Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Emily S Charlson; Kyle Bittinger; Andrew R Haas; Ayannah S Fitzgerald; Ian Frank; Anjana Yadav; Frederic D Bushman; Ronald G Collman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Takeshi Nakajima; Vyachesav Palchevsky; David L Perkins; John A Belperio; Patricia W Finn Journal: Semin Immunopathol Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 9.623
Authors: Alex G Cuenca; Matthew J Delano; Kindra M Kelly-Scumpia; Claudia Moreno; Philip O Scumpia; Drake M Laface; Paul G Heyworth; Philip A Efron; Lyle L Moldawer Journal: Mol Med Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Dana L Willner; Philip Hugenholtz; Stephanie T Yerkovich; Maxine E Tan; Joshua N Daly; Nancy Lachner; Peter M Hopkins; Daniel C Chambers Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Perry S Brown; Christopher E Pope; Robyn L Marsh; Xuan Qin; Sharon McNamara; Ronald Gibson; Jane L Burns; Gail Deutsch; Lucas R Hoffman Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-09
Authors: Emily F A van 't Wout; Annemarie van Schadewijk; Ria van Boxtel; Lucy E Dalton; Hanna J Clarke; Jan Tommassen; Stefan J Marciniak; Pieter S Hiemstra Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Caroline C Eskind; Meghan H Shilts; Ciara M Shaver; Suman R Das; Gowri Satyanarayana Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2021-04-16 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Michael P Combs; David S Wheeler; Jenna E Luth; Nicole R Falkowski; Natalie M Walker; John R Erb-Downward; Vibha N Lama; Robert P Dickson Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: John E McGinniss; Samantha A Whiteside; Aurea Simon-Soro; Joshua M Diamond; Jason D Christie; Fredrick D Bushman; Ronald G Collman Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 13.569
Authors: Nirmal S Sharma; Grant Vestal; Keith Wille; Kapil N Patel; Feng Cheng; Srinivas Tipparaju; Sultan Tousif; Mudassir M Banday; Xin Xu; Landon Wilson; Viswam S Nair; Casey Morrow; Don Hayes; Andreas Seyfang; Stephen Barnes; Jessy S Deshane; Amit Gaggar Journal: Respir Res Date: 2020-05-06