Literature DB >> 28755930

Locomotion characteristics of dairy cows walking on pasture and the effect of artificial flooring systems on locomotion comfort.

M Alsaaod1, S Huber2, G Beer2, P Kohler2, G Schüpbach-Regula3, A Steiner2.   

Abstract

The locomotion comfort of dairy cows depends on the floor of the walking alleys. Optimal locomotion comfort is given when cows walk on pasture, allowing freedom from discomfort and pain and the expression of normal behavior. This study examined the characteristics of locomotion behavior on pasture (gold standard with optimal locomotion comfort) and compared it with behaviors of cows walking on mastic asphalt or solid rubber mats before and after a routine claw trimming session. Our hypotheses were (1) that gait variables were different on pasture versus mastic asphalt and on mastic asphalt versus rubber, and (2) that claw trimming had an effect on gait variables of cows walking on mastic asphalt. Twenty-four dairy cows kept in a tiestall facility were enrolled in this experimental trial. The pedogram was measured using 2 standalone 3-dimensional accelerometers (400 Hz), attached to the metatarsus of both hind limbs. The extracted pedogram variables included temporal events (kinematic outcome = gait cycle and stance-phase and swing-phase durations) and peaks (kinetic outcome = foot load, toe-off). The cows were further video-recorded to calculate walking speed and stride length. Locomotion score was performed on mastic asphalt to enroll only nonlame cows (locomotion score <3). For comparison between different floor types, repeated-measures ANOVA was performed with the cow as a subject variable, session time of measurement as within-subject variable, and flooring type as a fixed effect. Three separate analyses were performed: pasture versus mastic asphalt (analysis I), solid rubber versus mastic asphalt (analysis II), and the effect of claw trimming on the kinematic and kinetic variables on mastic asphalt (analysis III). All tested gait variables were significantly different between pasture and mastic asphalt floor. The optimal characteristics of locomotion comfort on pasture included shorter duration of gait cycle, longer stance-phase duration, shorter swing-phase duration, higher walking speed, longer stride length, and higher peaks of foot load and toe-off. However, gait variables of cows walking on rubber mats did not show any significant difference compared with the mastic asphalt floor; only stride length tended to be longer on rubber mats. In addition, the stance- and swing-phase durations significantly improved shortly after trimming. The left-right differences of the stance- and swing-phase durations tended to decrease after claw trimming when cows walked on asphalt floor. The results of this study show that solid rubber flooring does not result in significant improvement of the evaluated variables of locomotion comfort compared with mastic asphalt. The Authors. Published by the Federation of Animal Science Societies and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerometer; dairy cow; floor; gait cycle

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28755930     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-12760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

1.  Lameness prevalence and management practices on Irish pasture-based dairy farms.

Authors:  N Browne; C D Hudson; R E Crossley; K Sugrue; E Kennedy; J N Huxley; M Conneely
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Pasture Access Affects Behavioral Indicators of Wellbeing in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Kirsty Jenkins; Emily J Bethell; Conrad P Ferris; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Artificial Grass as an Alternative Laneway Surface for Dairy Cows Walking to Pasture.

Authors:  Stephanie Buijs; Gillian Scoley; Deborah McConnell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Identifying cow - level factors and farm characteristics associated with locomotion scores in dairy cows using cumulative link mixed models.

Authors:  Andreas W Oehm; Roswitha Merle; Annegret Tautenhahn; K Charlotte Jensen; Kerstin-Elisabeth Mueller; Melanie Feist; Yury Zablotski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Why Is the Grass the Best Surface to Prevent Lameness? Integrative Analysis of Functional Ranges as a Key for Dairy Cows' Welfare.

Authors:  Paul Medina-González; Karen Moreno; Marcelo Gómez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Locomotion behavior of dairy cows on traditional summer mountain farms in comparison with modern cubicle housing without access to pasture.

Authors:  Maher Alsaaod; Salome Dürr; Damian Iten; Wolfgang Buescher; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessing the Accuracy of Leg Mounted Sensors for Recording Dairy Cow Behavioural Activity at Pasture, in Cubicle Housing and a Straw Yard.

Authors:  Gemma Charlton; Carrie Gauld; Fabio Veronesi; Steven Mark Rutter; Emma Bleach
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  The Welfare of Dairy Cows in Pasture, Free Stall, and Compost Barn Management Systems in a Brazilian Subtropical Region.

Authors:  Paula de Andrade Kogima; Taciana Aparecida Diesel; Frederico Márcio Correa Vieira; Ana Luiza Bachmann Schogor; Alana Aparecida Volpini; Géssica Jaine Veloso; Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz; Maria Luísa Appendino Nunes Zotti
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 3.231

9.  Trot Accelerations of Equine Front and Hind Hooves Shod with Polyurethane Composite Shoes and Steel Shoes on Asphalt.

Authors:  Lauren Veneta Moore; Rebeka Roza Zsoldos; Theresia Franziska Licka
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.