Literature DB >> 28755556

A meta-analysis of cortisol concentration, vocalization, and average daily gain associated with castration in beef cattle.

Maria Eugênia Andrighetto Canozzi1, America Mederos2, Xavier Manteca3, Simon Turner4, Concepta McManus5, Daniele Zago1, Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos6.   

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) were performed to summarize all scientific evidence for the effects of castration in male beef cattle on welfare indicators based on cortisol concentration, average daily gain (ADG), and vocalization. We searched five electronic databases, conference proceedings, and experts were contacted electronically. The main inclusion criteria involved completed studies using beef cattle up to one year of age undergoing surgical and non-surgical castration that presented cortisol concentration, ADG, or vocalization as an outcome. A random effect MA was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. A total of 20 publications reporting 26 studies and 162 trials were included in the MA involving 1814 cattle. Between study heterogeneity was observed when analysing cortisol (I2=56.7%) and ADG (I2=79.6%). Surgical and non-surgical castration without drug administration compared to uncastrated animals showed no change (P≥0.05) in cortisol level. Multimodal therapy for pain did not decrease (P≥0.05) cortisol concentration after 30min when non-surgical castration was performed. Comparison between surgical castration, with and without anaesthesia, showed a tendency (P=0.077) to decrease cortisol levels after 120min of intervention. Non-surgical and surgical castration, performed with no pain mitigation, increased and tended to increase the ADG by 0.814g/d (P=0.001) and by 0.140g/d (P=0.091), respectively, when compared to a non-castrated group. Our MA study demonstrates an inconclusive result to draw recommendations on preferred castration practices to minimize pain in beef cattle.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia; Animal welfare; Pain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28755556     DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  5 in total

1.  Objective Measures for the Assessment of Post-Operative Pain in Bos indicus Bull Calves Following Castration.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Musk; Stine Jacobsen; Timothy H Hyndman; Heidi S Lehmann; S Jonathon Tuke; Teresa Collins; Karina B Gleerup; Craig B Johnson; Michael Laurence
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Measuring Farm Animal Emotions-Sensor-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Suresh Neethirajan; Inonge Reimert; Bas Kemp
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Effect of bupivacaine liposome suspension administered as a local anesthetic block on indicators of pain and distress during and after surgical castration in dairy calves.

Authors:  Miriam S Martin; Michael D Kleinhenz; Abbie V Viscardi; Andrew K Curtis; Blaine T Johnson; Shawnee R Montgomery; Maria E Lou; Johann F Coetzee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effect of Immediately-After-Birth Weaning on the Development of Goat Kids Born to Small Ruminant Lentivirus-Positive Dams.

Authors:  Tomasz Nalbert; Michał Czopowicz; Olga Szaluś-Jordanow; Agata Moroz; Marcin Mickiewicz; Lucjan Witkowski; Iwona Markowska-Daniel; Ryszard Puchała; Emilia Bagnicka; Jarosław Kaba
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Affective State Recognition in Livestock-Artificial Intelligence Approaches.

Authors:  Suresh Neethirajan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.231

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.