Literature DB >> 28755447

Matches and mismatches between conservation investments and biodiversity values in the European Union.

David Sánchez-Fernández1, Pedro Abellán2, Pedro Aragón3, Sara Varela4, Mar Cabeza5.   

Abstract

Recently, the European Commission adopted a new strategy to halt the loss of biodiversity. Member states are expected to favor a more effective collection and redistribution of European Union (EU) funds under the current Multiannual Financial Framework for 2014-2020. Because of the large spatial variation in the distribution of biodiversity and conservation needs at the continental scale, EU instruments should ensure that countries with higher biodiversity values get more funds and resources for the conservation than other countries. Using linear regressions, we assessed the association between conservation investments and biodiversity values across member states, accounting for a variety of conservation investment indicators, taxonomic groups (including groups of plants, vertebrates, and invertebrates), and indicators of biodiversity value. In general, we found clear overall associations between conservation investments and biodiversity variables. However, some countries received more or less investment than would be expected based on biodiversity values in those countries. We also found that the extensive use of birds as unique indicators of conservation effectiveness may lead to biased decisions. Our results can inform future decisions regarding funding allocation and thus improve distribution of EU conservation funds.
© 2017 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  LIFE program; Natura 2000; asignación de fondos; conservation policy; endemism; endemismo; especies de interés comunitario; funds allocation; política de conservación; programa LIFE; riqueza de especies; species of community interest; species richness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28755447     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  3 in total

1.  Conservation priorities for terrestrial mammals in Dobrogea Region, Romania.

Authors:  Iulia V Miu; Gabriel B Chisamera; Viorel D Popescu; Ruben Iosif; Andreea Nita; Steluta Manolache; Viorel D Gavril; Ioana Cobzaru; Laurentiu Rozylowicz
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.546

2.  Assessing threats of non-native species to native freshwater biodiversity: Conservation priorities for the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie Panlasigui; Amy J S Davis; Michael J Mangiante; John A Darling
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.990

3.  Realising the potential of Natura 2000 to achieve EU conservation goals as 2020 approaches.

Authors:  Virgilio Hermoso; Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez; Stefano Canessa; Lluis Brotons
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.