Literature DB >> 28754794

A Comparative Study on the WCRF International/University of Bristol Methodology for Systematic Reviews of Mechanisms Underpinning Exposure-Cancer Associations.

Gökhan Ertaylan1, Charlotte Le Cornet2, Eline H van Roekel3, Audrey Y Jung2, Martijn J L Bours4, Antje Damms-Machado2, Piet A van den Brandt4,5, Helena Schock2, Theo M de Kok1,6, Jan Theys7, Ilja C W Arts1,8, Rudolf Kaaks2, Matty P Weijenberg4, Renée Turzanski Fortner9.   

Abstract

The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) International and the University of Bristol have developed a novel framework for providing an overview of mechanistic pathways and conducting a systematic literature review of the biologically plausible mechanisms underlying exposure-cancer associations. Two teams independently applied the two-stage framework on mechanisms underpinning the association between body fatness and breast cancer to test the framework feasibility and reproducibility as part of a WCRF-commissioned validation study. In stage I, a "hypothesis-free" approach was used to provide an overview of potential intermediate mechanisms between body fatness and breast cancer. Dissimilar rankings of potential mechanisms were observed between the two teams due to different applications of the framework. In stage II, a systematic review was conducted on the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) chosen as an intermediate mechanism. Although the studies included differed, both teams found inconclusive evidence for the body fatness-IGF1R association and modest evidence linking IGF1R to breast cancer, and therefore concluded that there is currently weak evidence for IGF1R as mechanism linking body fatness to breast cancer. The framework is a good starting point for conducting systematic reviews by integrating evidence from mechanistic studies on exposure-cancer associations. On the basis of our experience, we provide recommendations for future users. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(11); 1583-94. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28754794     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  4 in total

Review 1.  Linking Physical Activity to Breast Cancer: Text Mining Results and a Protocol for Systematically Reviewing Three Potential Mechanistic Pathways.

Authors:  Brigid M Lynch; Roger L Milne; Dallas R English; Kristy A Brown; Ann E Drummond; Christopher T V Swain; Eline H van Roekel; Melissa M Moore; Tom R Gaunt; Richard M Martin; Sarah J Lewis
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Third Expert Report on Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Cancer: Impact and Future Directions.

Authors:  Steven K Clinton; Edward L Giovannucci; Stephen D Hursting
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Evaluating biological plausibility in supporting evidence for action through systematic reviews in public health.

Authors:  J Dailey; L Rosman; E K Silbergeld
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  Developing the WCRF International/University of Bristol Methodology for Identifying and Carrying Out Systematic Reviews of Mechanisms of Exposure-Cancer Associations.

Authors:  Sarah J Lewis; Mike Gardner; Julian Higgins; Jeff M P Holly; Tom R Gaunt; Claire M Perks; Suzanne D Turner; Sabina Rinaldi; Steve Thomas; Sean Harrison; Rosie J Lennon; Vanessa Tan; Cath Borwick; Pauline Emmett; Mona Jeffreys; Kate Northstone; Giota Mitrou; Martin Wiseman; Rachel Thompson; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.254

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.