Literature DB >> 28754527

Ultrasound use during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with delays in chest compressions.

Maite A Huis In 't Veld1, Michael G Allison2, David S Bostick1, Kiondra R Fisher3, Olga G Goloubeva4, Michael D Witting5, Michael E Winters6.   

Abstract

AIM: High-quality chest compressions are a critical component of the resuscitation of patients in cardiopulmonary arrest. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is used frequently during emergency department (ED) resuscitations, but there has been limited research assessing its benefits and harms during the delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We hypothesized that use of POCUS during cardiac arrest resuscitation adversely affects high-quality CPR by lengthening the duration of pulse checks beyond the current cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines recommendation of 10s.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of adults in cardiac arrest treated in an urban ED between August 2015 and September 2016. Resuscitations were recorded using video equipment in designated resuscitation rooms, and the use of POCUS was documented and timed. A linear mixed-effects model was used to estimate the effect of POCUS on pulse check duration.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled in our study. The mean duration of pulse checks with POCUS was 21.0s (95% CI, 18-24) compared with 13.0s (95% CI, 12-15) for those without POCUS. POCUS increased the duration of pulse checks and CPR interruption by 8.4s (95% CI, 6.7-10.0 [p<0.0001]). Age, body mass index (BMI), and procedures did not significantly affect the duration of pulse checks.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of POCUS during cardiac arrest resuscitation was associated with significantly increased duration of pulse checks, nearly doubling the 10-s maximum duration recommended in current guidelines. It is important for acute care providers to pay close attention to the duration of interruptions in the delivery of chest compressions when using POCUS during cardiac arrest resuscitation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPR; Cardiac arrest; Delay; Interruptions; POCUS; Point-of-care ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28754527     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  28 in total

1.  Finding a window: Timing of cardiac ultrasound acquisition during cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Katherine M Berg
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 2.  Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): unnecessary gadgetry or evidence-based medicine?

Authors:  Nicholas Smallwood; Martin Dachsel
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  First do no harm: Echocardiography during cardiac arrest may increase pulse check duration.

Authors:  Ari Moskowitz; Katherine M Berg
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Associated With Shorter Compression Pauses Compared With Transthoracic Echocardiography.

Authors:  James Fair; Michael P Mallin; Aaron Adler; Patrick Ockerse; Jacob Steenblik; Joseph Tonna; Scott T Youngquist
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 5.  Point of care ultrasonography from the emergency department to the internal medicine ward: current trends and perspectives.

Authors:  Antonio Leidi; Frédéric Rouyer; Christophe Marti; Jean-Luc Reny; Olivier Grosgurin
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 6.  In-hospital cardiac arrest: are we overlooking a key distinction?

Authors:  Ari Moskowitz; Mathias J Holmberg; Michael W Donnino; Katherine M Berg
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.687

7.  Singapore Advanced Cardiac Life Support Guidelines 2021.

Authors:  Chi Keong Ching; Benjamin Sieu-Hon Leong; Praseetha Nair; Kim Chai Chan; Eillyne Seow; Francis Lee; Kenneth Heng; Duu Wen Sewa; Toon Wei Lim; Daniel Thuan Tee Chong; Khung Keong Yeo; Wee Kim Fong; Venkataraman Anantharaman; Swee Han Lim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 8.  [Adult advanced life support].

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.826

Review 9.  [Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].

Authors:  Carsten Lott; Anatolij Truhlář; Anette Alfonzo; Alessandro Barelli; Violeta González-Salvado; Jochen Hinkelbein; Jerry P Nolan; Peter Paal; Gavin D Perkins; Karl-Christian Thies; Joyce Yeung; David A Zideman; Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 0.826

10.  Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Katherine M Berg; Lars W Andersen; Bernd W Böttiger; Sofia Cacciola; Clifton W Callaway; Keith Couper; Tobias Cronberg; Sonia D'Arrigo; Charles D Deakin; Michael W Donnino; Ian R Drennan; Asger Granfeldt; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Mathias J Holmberg; Cindy H Hsu; Marlijn Kamps; Szymon Musiol; Kevin J Nation; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Brian J O'Neil; Quentin Otto; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Michael J A Parr; Joshua C Reynolds; Claudio Sandroni; Barnaby R Scholefield; Markus B Skrifvars; Tzong-Luen Wang; Wolfgang A Wetsch; Joyce Yeung; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Michelle Welsford; Mary Fran Hazinski; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.