Yasmin Garad1, Katerina Maximova1, Nathalie MacKinnon2, Jennifer J McGrath3, Anita L Kozyrskyj4, Ian Colman5. 1. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 5. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: icolman@uottawa.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood adversity increases the risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adulthood. Previously proposed mechanisms suggest that the association is mediated by stress reactivity-known to be higher in women-and is aggravated by adult stress, but this has not yet been confirmed. Therefore, we investigated sex differences to better understand possible pathways from childhood adversity to CVD. METHODS: The National Population Health Survey, a 15-year cohort study of Canadians aged 18-49 years at baseline was used. Logistic regression with interaction terms for sex and stressful life events was used to assess the risk of CVD after childhood adversity. In secondary analyses, we assessed mediation effects of depression, smoking, alcohol, exercise, and diet using the product of coefficient approach. Mediated moderation was subsequently used to explain sex-moderated effects. RESULTS: There was a strong association between childhood adversity and CVD (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-2.94) for 3+ childhood adversities. The association was stronger with increasing stressful events, and female patients with 3+ stressful events exhibited the highest risk of CVD (OR, 4.40; 95% CI, 1.98-9.75). No association was found in men. Depression, smoking, and poor diet partially mediated the relationship between childhood adversity and CVD (14%, 9%, and 9%, respectively), but differences in these behaviours did not fully explain the sex-specific differences in the mediated moderation analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of childhood adverse events on CVD is heightened among women, particularly women with stressful adulthoods, and this difference is not mediated by depression, smoking, or poor diet. These findings have important implications for understanding sex differences in CVD risk.
BACKGROUND: Childhood adversity increases the risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adulthood. Previously proposed mechanisms suggest that the association is mediated by stress reactivity-known to be higher in women-and is aggravated by adult stress, but this has not yet been confirmed. Therefore, we investigated sex differences to better understand possible pathways from childhood adversity to CVD. METHODS: The National Population Health Survey, a 15-year cohort study of Canadians aged 18-49 years at baseline was used. Logistic regression with interaction terms for sex and stressful life events was used to assess the risk of CVD after childhood adversity. In secondary analyses, we assessed mediation effects of depression, smoking, alcohol, exercise, and diet using the product of coefficient approach. Mediated moderation was subsequently used to explain sex-moderated effects. RESULTS: There was a strong association between childhood adversity and CVD (odds ratio [OR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56-2.94) for 3+ childhood adversities. The association was stronger with increasing stressful events, and female patients with 3+ stressful events exhibited the highest risk of CVD (OR, 4.40; 95% CI, 1.98-9.75). No association was found in men. Depression, smoking, and poor diet partially mediated the relationship between childhood adversity and CVD (14%, 9%, and 9%, respectively), but differences in these behaviours did not fully explain the sex-specific differences in the mediated moderation analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of childhood adverse events on CVD is heightened among women, particularly women with stressful adulthoods, and this difference is not mediated by depression, smoking, or poor diet. These findings have important implications for understanding sex differences in CVD risk.
Authors: Adolfo G Cuevas; Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald; Leslie Cofie; Masayoshi Zaitsu; Jennifer Allen; David R Williams Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Lotte van Dammen; Nicole R Bush; Susanne R de Rooij; Ben Willem J Mol; Henk Groen; Annemieke Hoek; Tessa J Roseboom Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Fabienne E M Willemen; Mirjam van Zuiden; Jasper B Zantvoord; Susanne R de Rooij; Bert-Jan H van den Born; A Elisabeth Hak; Kathleen Thomaes; Menno Segeren; Leonie K Elsenburg; Anja Lok Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-07-14
Authors: Pratik Pimple; Bruno B Lima; Muhammad Hammadah; Kobina Wilmot; Ronnie Ramadan; Oleksiy Levantsevych; Samaah Sullivan; Jeong Hwan Kim; Belal Kaseer; Amit J Shah; Laura Ward; Paolo Raggi; J Douglas Bremner; John Hanfelt; Tene Lewis; Arshed A Quyyumi; Viola Vaccarino Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Robert G Maunder; David W Tannenbaum; Joanne A Permaul; Melissa Nutik; Cleo Haber; Mira Mitri; Daniela Costantini; Jonathan J Hunter Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Ana G Soares; Laura D Howe; Jon Heron; Gemma Hammerton; Janet Rich-Edwards; Maria C Magnus; Sarah L Halligan; Abigail Fraser Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 9.685