| Literature DB >> 28754142 |
Nessika Karsenti1, Rachel Lau2, Andrew Purssell3, Ann Chong-Kit2, Marlou Cunanan2, Jason Gasgas2, Jinfang Tian2, Amanda Wang2, Filip Ralevski2, Andrea K Boggild4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Suboptimal agreement between molecular assays for the detection of Acanthamoeba spp. in clinical specimens has been demonstrated, and poor assay sensitivity directly imperils the vision of those affected by amoebic keratitis (AK) through delayed diagnosis. We sought to develop and validate a single Taqman real time PCR assay targeting the Acanthamoeba 18S rRNA gene that could be used to enhance sensitivity and specificity when paired with reference assays.Entities:
Keywords: Acanthamoebae; Amoebic keratitis; Corneal ulcer; Molecular diagnosis; Ophthalmology
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28754142 PMCID: PMC5534048 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2666-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Reference standard positive ATCC specimens used in the validation of the new primer set, and species identification of positive clinical specimens
| Source | Specimen | Species | Reference standard assay positivea |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATCC | ATCC50372 |
| Both |
| ATCC30173 |
| Both | |
| ATCC50492 |
| Both | |
| ATCC PRA-220 |
| Both | |
| ATCC50372 |
| Both | |
| ATCC50373 |
| Both | |
| ATCC50492 |
| Both | |
| ATCC50493 |
| Both | |
| ATCC50739 |
| Both | |
| ATCC30171 |
| Qvarnstrom | |
| Clinical specimen | 1 |
| Both |
| 2 |
| Qvarnstrom | |
| 3 |
| Both | |
| 4 |
| Qvarnstrom | |
| 5 | Unknown | Qvarnstrom | |
| 6 |
| Both | |
| 7 | Unknown | Riviere | |
| 8 |
| Riviere | |
| 9 |
| Riviere | |
| 10 |
| Riviere | |
| 11 | Unknown | Riviere | |
| 12 |
| Both | |
| 13 |
| Both | |
| 14 | Unknown | Riviere | |
| 15 |
| Qvarnstrom | |
| 16 | Unknown | Riviere | |
| 17 |
| Both | |
| 18 |
| Both | |
| 19 | Unknown | Qvarnstrom | |
| 20 | Unknown | Qvarnstrom | |
| 21 |
| Qvarnstrom |
aReference standard assays were Riviere [6] and Qvarnstrom [7], and a specimen was considered positive if either assay produced a logarithmic amplification curve with cycle threshold <40 on real time PCR
Organisms used for cross-checking of primers to ensure lack of cross-species and genera reactivity
| Organism | Source | Specimen type | Number of specimens analyzed |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Reference laboratory | Whole blood | 4 |
|
| Reference laboratory | Whole blood | 5 |
|
| Reference laboratory | Whole blood | 3 |
|
| Reference laboratory | Whole blood | 1 |
|
| Reference laboratory | Stool | 1 |
| Herpes simplex 1 | Reference laboratory | DNA from viral culture | 1 |
| Herpes simplex 2 | Reference laboratory | DNA from viral culture | 1 |
| Rickettsiales | Reference laboratory |
| 1 |
| Chlamydiales | Reference laboratory |
| 1 |
| Legionellales | Reference laboratory | Clinical culture isolate | 1 |
Performance characteristics of the new assay compared to the Qvarnstrom assay [7]
| Primer Set | Positive (N) | Negative (N) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New primer set | 29 | 78 | 100% (95% CI 82.8–100%) | 94.0% (95% CI 85.9–97.8%) | 82.8 | 100 |
By Qvarnstrom, 24 specimens were considered true positive, and 83 were considered true negative
Performance characteristics of the new assay compared to the composite reference standard of either or both Qvarnstrom [7] and Riviere [6] assay positivity
| Primer Set | Positive (N) | Negative (N) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New primer set | 29 | 78 | 93.5% (95% CI 77.2–98.9%) | 100% (95% CI 94.0–100%) | 100 | 97.4 |
By either or both of Qvarnstrom and Riviere, 31 specimens were considered true positive, and 76 were considered true negative
Performance characteristics of the new assay, as well as Riviere [6] and Qvarnstrom [7] compared to culture as the reference standard
| Primer Set | Positive (N) | Negative (N) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New primer set | 13 | 24 | 100% (95% CI 69.9–100%) | 96.0% (95% CI 77.7–99.8%) | 92.3 | 100 |
| Riviere assay [ | 11 | 26 | 91.7% (95% CI 59.8–99.6%) | 100% (95% CI 83.4–100%) | 100 | 96.1 |
| Qvarnstrom assay [ | 12 | 25 | 100% (95% CI 69.9–100%) | 100% (95% CI 83.4–100%) | 100 | 100 |
By culture, 12 specimens were considered true positive and 25 specimens were considered true negative