| Literature DB >> 28754089 |
Katia Falasca1, Marta Di Nicola2, Italo Porfilio3, Claudio Ucciferri4,5, Elisabetta Schiaroli6, Chiara Gabrielli6, Daniela Francisci6, Jacopo Vecchiet4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is a common problem in the HIV+ population, due to the effect of both the HIV virus and the several classes of ARV drugs such as tenofovir (TDF). It is also known that the presence of renal damage correlates with cardiovascular risk and therefore with the risk of mortality of the patients accordingly. The detection of early renal damage is very important. Albuminuria and microalbuminuria are markers of early kidney disease and cardiovascular risk. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prevalence of microalbuminuria in a large polycentric sample, of unselected and consecutive HIV-patients followed as outpatients, and to assess its association with different therapeutic regimens.Entities:
Keywords: Adverse events; Antiretroviral therapy; Kidneys
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28754089 PMCID: PMC5534061 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0672-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Baseline patient’s characteristics according to subgroup. Data are expressed as frequency and percentage or as median (IQR)
|
| Overall | Equal | Improved | Worse |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender |
| ||||
| Female | 65 (19.9) | 40 (17.5) | 12 (19.4) | 13 (36.1) | |
| Male | 261 (80.1) | 188 (82.5) | 50 (80.6) | 23 (63.9) | |
| Race | 0.522 | ||||
| caucasian | 300 (92.0) | 211 (92.5) | 55 (88.7) | 34 (94.4) | |
| non caucasian | 26 (8.0) | 17 (7.5) | 7 (11.3) | 2 (5.6) | |
| Risk factor | 0.213 | ||||
| homosexuals | 120 (36.8) | 90 (40.0) | 22 (35.5) | 8 (22.2) | |
| IV Drug user | 49 (15.0) | 32 (14.2) | 12 (19.3) | 5 (13.9) | |
| heterosexuals | 154 (47.2) | 103 (45.8) | 28 (45.2) | 23 (63.9) | |
| HCV | 0.488 | ||||
| no | 360 (79.7) | 182 (79.8) | 47 (75.8) | 31 (86.1) | |
| yes | 66 (20.3) | 46 (20.2) | 15 (24.2) | 5 (13.9) | |
| Diabetes | 0.242 | ||||
| no | 296 (90.8) | 203 (89.0) | 59 (95.2) | 34 (94.4) | |
| yes | 30 (9.2) | 25 (11.0) | 3 (4.8) | 2 (5.6) | |
| Hypertension |
| ||||
| no | 237 (72.7) | 156 (68.4) | 52 (83.9) | 29 (80.6) | |
| yes | 89 (27.3) | 72 (31.6) | 10 (16.1) | 7 (19.4) | |
| ART | 0.415 | ||||
| no | 25 (7.7) | 20 (8.8) | 4 (6.3) | 1 (2.8) | |
| yes | 301 (92.3) | 207 (92.2) | 59 (93.7) | 35 (97.2) | |
| TDF based ART |
| ||||
| no | 123 (45.4) | 94 (45.4) | 19 (32.2) | 10 (28.6) | |
| yes | 178 (54.6) | 113 (54.6) | 40 (67.8) | 25 (71.4) | |
| Type of ART | 0.926 | ||||
| NNRTI | 146 (47.0) | 101 (47.4) | 29 (48.3) | 16 (43.2) | |
| IP | 120 (38.8) | 81 (38.0) | 24 (40.0) | 15 (40.5) | |
| INI | 44 (14.2) | 31 (14.6) | 7 (11.7) | 6 (16.3) | |
| AIDS | 0.544 | ||||
| no | 247 (75.8) | 169 (74.1) | 50 (80.6) | 28 (77.8) | |
| yes | 79 (24.2) | 59 (25.9) | 12 (19.4) | 8 (22.2) | |
| Smoke | 0.609 | ||||
| no | 153 (46.9) | 108 (47.4) | 28 (45.2) | 17 (47.2) | |
| yes | 130 (39.9) | 88 (38.6) | 29 (46.8) | 13 (36.1) | |
| ex | 43 (13.2) | 32 (14.0) | 5 (8.0) | 6 (16.7) | |
| BMI | 24.8 (22.3–28.0) | 24.6 (22.1-27.7) | 26.0 (23.6-30.1) | 24.1 (22.5-26.7) |
|
| Duration of disease | 10.0 (5.0-17.0) | 11.0 (6.0-17.7) | 11.0 (4.0-17.0) | 7.0 (5.0-15.7) | 0.302b |
aChi-squared test; bStudent t-test for unpaired data. P values in bold suggest significant values.
Fig. 1Prevalence of microalbuminuria at T0 and T48
Fig. 2Prevalence of microalbuminuria in three subgroups. Equal: group of patients that no changes the microalbuminuria status in the 48 weeks of study. Improves: group of patients that resolved the microalbuminuria status in the 48 weeks of study. Worse: group of patients that has a worsening of microalbuminuria status in the 48 weeks of study
Mean and standard deviation of metabolic parameters
| Equal | Improved | Worse | Timea | Subgroupb | Interactionc | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T48 | T0 | T48 | T0 | T48 | ||||
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 125.0 ± 14.9 | 125.4 ± 14.0 | 122.8 ± 15.4 | 124.6 ± 16.1 | 121.4 ± 17.3 | 123.1 ± 15.8 | 0.097 | 0.432 | 0.534 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 78.0 ± 9.6 | 78.5 ± 12.1 | 77.2 ± 8.9 | 78.8 ± 10.2 | 75.8 ± 9.9 | 77.0 ± 9.7 | 0.114 | 0.557 | 0.684 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 190.8 ± 43.2 | 191.6 ± 42.4 | 182.7 ± 47.7 | 203.3 ± 54.3 | 187.3 ± 51.8 | 204.9 ± 44.9 | 0.141 | 0.646 |
|
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 159.5 ± 90.2 | 167.2 ± 145.9 | 146.5 ± 81.6 | 142.0 ± 74.6 | 136.1 ± 70.4 | 142.4 ± 98.2 | 0.958 | 0.384 | 0.980 |
| LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL | 111.1 ± 37.1 | 114.0 ± 33.6 | 103.7 ± 41.4 | 125.9 ± 38.9 | 119.1 ± 47.3 | 115.4 ± 35.8 |
| 0.872 |
|
| Fasting glucose, mg/dL | 92.5 ± 21.3 | 91.7 ± 30.3 | 91.5 ± 20.7 | 81.9 ± 9.2 | 96.4 ± 25.6 | 89.3 ± 15.8 | 0.176 | 0.117 | 0.257 |
| CD4, % | 30.2 ± 9.8 | 37.1 ± 54.3 | 28.1 ± 10.9 | 29.2 ± 10.5 | 32.1 ± 6.3 | 33.2 ± 7.9 | 0.514 | 0.581 | 0.748 |
| CD4+, cell/μL | 651.4 ± 295.8 | 688.0 ± 294.7 | 659.5 ± 344.0 | 767.1 ± 398.1 | 663.0 ± 281.2 | 755.4 ± 323.4 |
| 0.675 | 0.376 |
| CD4/CD8 ratio | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 0.208 | 0.699 | 0.178 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.600 | 0.359 | 0.503 |
| Uric acid, mg/dL | 5.3 ± 2.0 | 5.3 ± 1.5 | 5.1 ± 1.2 | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 5.3 ± 2.3 | 4.8 ± 0.9 | 0.656 | 0.608 | 0.733 |
| MDRD glomerular filtration rate, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 100.7 ± 24.4 | 101.6 ± 23.4 | 89.0 ± 55.2 | 90.5 ± 27.6 | 95.7 ± 17.3 | 91.9 ± 16.5 | 0.991 | 0.728 | 0.870 |
| Albuminemia, g/dl | 4.4 ± 0.4 | 4.4 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 4.4 ± 0.4 | 4.4 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 0.217 | 0.487 | 0.725 |
| GOT/GPT ratio | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.7 |
|
|
|
| Cystatin C, mg/L | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| 0.612 | 0.250 |
aProbability that values are influenced by time. For each variable, the difference has been tested between the mean of the T0 and the mean of the T48, independently of subgroup
bProbability that values are influenced by the change of state of microalbuminuria. For each variable, the difference has been tested between the means of the subgroups, independently of time
cProbability that the effect of the treatment time is different in the three subgroups (equal, improved and worse)
p values in bold suggest significant values