| Literature DB >> 28753957 |
Malgorzata Karbowska1, Tomasz W Kaminski2, Natalia Marcinczyk3, Tomasz Misztal4, Tomasz Rusak5, Lukasz Smyk6, Dariusz Pawlak7.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are at high risk for thrombotic events. Indoxyl sulfate (IS) is one of the most potent uremic toxins that accumulates during CKD. Even though IS is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular disease, its impact on thrombotic events still remains not fully understood. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the direct effect of IS on thrombotic process. We examined the impact of acute exposure to IS on thrombus development induced by electric current in Wistar rats, intravital thrombus formation after laser-induced injury in the mice endothelium, coagulation profile, clot formation dynamics, platelet aggregations, and erythrocyte osmotic resistance. IS doses: 10, 30 and 100 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) increased weight of thrombus induced by electric current in dose-dependent manner (p < 0.001). Furthermore, two highest IS doses increased laser-induced thrombus formation observed via confocal system (increase in fluorescence intensity and total thrombus area (p < 0.01)). Only the highest IS dose decreased clotting time (p < 0.01) and increased maximum clot firmness (p < 0.05). IS did not affect blood morphology parameters and erythrocyte osmotic resistance, but augmented collagen-induced aggregation. Obtained data indicate that IS creates prothrombotic state and contributes to more stable thrombus formation. Thus, we concluded that IS may be one of crucial uremic factors promoting thrombotic events in CKD patients.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular event; chronic kidney disease; hemostatic disorder; indoxyl sulfate; prothrombotic state; thrombosis; tryptophan derivative; uremic toxin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28753957 PMCID: PMC5535176 DOI: 10.3390/toxins9070229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1The plasma concentrations of IS following acute administration. VEH—control group; IS—indoxyl sulfate; ** p < 0.01 compared to control; *** p < 0.001 compared to control; ^ p < 0.05 compared to 3 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) of IS; ^^^ p < 0.001 compared to 3 mg/kg b.w. of IS; && p < 0.01 compared to 10 mg/kg b.w. of IS.
Figure 2(A) The weight of the developed thrombus after exposure on IS in arterial thrombosis model; (B) Frequency of the thrombotic incidence. VEH—control group; IS—indoxyl sulfate; *** p < 0.001 compared to control; ^^ p < 0.01 compared to 3 mg/kg b.w. of IS; ^^^ p < 0.001 compared to 3 mg/kg b.w. of IS; && p < 0.01 compared to 10 mg/kg b.w. of IS.
Figure 3(A) Impact of IS on fluorescence intensity in intravital imaging of the thrombus development during 5 min evaluation after laser injury in mice model; (B) Effect of IS on thrombus area after laser-induced thrombus formation in intravital mice model; (C–F) Representative images of the developed thrombi in intravital model after administration of 0.9% natrium chloride (control group) or IS; water immersion, ×200. (C) VEH; (D) 10 mg/kg b.w. of IS; (E) 30 mg/kg b.w. of IS; (F) 100 mg/kg b.w. of IS. IS—indoxyl sulfate; VEH—control group; * p < 0.05 compared to control; ** p < 0.01 compared to control; ^ p < 0.05 compared to the dose of 10 mg/kg b.w. of IS; ^^ p < 0.01 compared to the dose of 10 mg/kg b.w. of IS.
Impact of IS on coagulation parameters.
| Parameter | VEH | 10 (mg/kg b.w.) | 30 (mg/kg b.w.) | 100 (mg/kg b.w.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.30 ± 1.70 | 20.4 ± 1.50 *** | 19.1 ± 1.2 *** | 19.7 ± 1.3 *** | |
| 2.27 ± 0.06 | 2.18 ± 0.07 * | 2.15 ± 0.04 ** | 2.19 ± 0.08 * | |
| 10.50 ± 0.60 | 11.40 ± 0.40 * | 10.90 ± 0.90 NS | 10.5 ± 0.90 NS | |
| 34.40 ± 2.10 | 36.00 ± 4.50 NS | 37.40 ± 3.50 NS | 33.3 ± 1.40 NS |
APTT—activated partial thromboplastin time; IS—indoxyl sulfate; PT—prothrombin time; NS—non-significant; TT—thrombin time; VEH—control group; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Parameters of dynamic of clot formation in whole blood after exposure to IS.
| Parameter | VEH | 10 (mg/kg b.w.) | 30 (mg/kg b.w.) | 100 (mg/kg b.w.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 ± 3.6 | 67.7 ± 2.8 NS | 68.4 ± 2.6 NS | 71 ± 6.3 NS | |
| 6661 ± 337 | 6761 ± 202 NS | 6764 ± 220 NS | 7231 ± 642 * | |
| 382 (333–477) | 391 (306–479) NS | 392 (234–427) NS | 323 (220–332) **,##,^ | |
| 66.1 ± 2.8 | 67.5 ± 3.3 NS | 67.2 ± 2.2 NS | 73.3 ± 6.3 *,#,^ | |
| 129 ± 20.6 | 127 ± 20.5 NS | 113 ± 12.7 NS | 88.6 ± 30.6 * |
IS—indoxyl sulfate; VEH—control group; AUC—area under the curve; CT—clotting time; MCF—maximal clot firmness; CFT—clot formation time; NS—non-significant; * p < 0.05 compared to control; ** p < 0.01 compared to control; # p < 0.05 compared to 10 mg. b.w. of IS; ## p < 0.01 compared to 10 mg/kg b.w. of IS; ^ p < 0.05 compared to 30 mg/kg b.w. of IS.
Figure 4Graphical representation of IS impact on ROTEM analyses. IS—indoxyl sulfate; VEH—control group; 10—the dose of 10 mg/kg b.w. of IS; 30—the dose of 30 mg/kg b.w. of IS; 100—the dose of 100 mg/kg b.w. of IS.
Figure 5Impact of IS on fibrin generation measured in platelet-depleted plasma. IS—indoxyl sulfate; VEH—control group; * p < 0.05 compared to control; ** p < 0.01 compared to control.
Figure 6Effect of IS on collagen-induced in vitro aggregation in whole blood. (A) area under the curve (AUC); (B) lag time of aggregation; (C) amplitude of the aggregation; (D) slope. IS—indoxyl sulfate; VEH—control group; * p < 0.05 compared to control; ** p < 0.01 compared to control; *** p < 0.001 compared to control; ^ p < 0.05 compared to 0.1 mM of IS; ^^ p < 0.01 compared to 0.1 mM of IS.
Impact of IS on ADP- and ADP+ 5-HT-induced platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma.
| Parameter | ADP | ADP+ 5-HT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VEH | 0.1 (mmol) | 0.5 (mmol) | 1.0 (mmol) | VEH | 0.1 (mmol) | 0.5 (mmol) | 1.0 (mmol) | |
| 75.7 ± 34.1 | 73.2 ± 19.8 NS | 85.2 ± 34.8 NS | 89 ± 29.8 NS | 131 ± 13.1 | 130 ± 17.0 NS | 133 ± 11.6 NS | 122 ± 17.7 NS | |
| 36.9 ± 18.8 | 43.3 ± 7.9 NS | 39.4 ± 19.2 NS | 40.8 ± 16.8 NS | 21.3 ± 5.85 | 18.6 ± 4.21 NS | 19.4 ± 2.13 NS | 20.9 ± 6.24 NS | |
| 49.3 ± 10.4 | 47.2 ± 10.4 NS | 49.3 ± 14.9 NS | 53.1 ± 8.1 NS | 64.4 ± 3.20 | 62.0 ± 6.23 NS | 65.4 ± 5.37 NS | 61.9 ± 6.31 NS | |
| 31 ± 6.1 | 30.8 ± 4.9 NS | 32.7 ± 7.1 NS | 35 ± 7.1 NS | 38.5 ± 1.77 | 38.9 ± 1.73 NS | 39.1 ± 2.53 NS | 36.6 ± 2.26 NS | |
IS—indoxyl sulfate; VEH—control group; 5-HT—serotonin; ADP—adenosine diphosphate; a.u.—arbitral units; NS—non-significant; s—seconds.
Figure 7Impact of IS on osmotic resistance of erythrocytes reflected as % of hemolysis.
Impact of IS on hematological parameters.
| Parameter | VEH | 3 (mg/kg b.w.) | 10 (mg/kg b.w.) | 30 (mg/kg b.w.) | 100 (mg/kg b.w.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCT (%) | 41.7 ± 2.9 | 41 ± 3.1 NS | 41 ± 2.8 NS | 40.1 ± 2.1 NS | 40.4 ± 2.3 NS |
| HGB (g/dL) | 14.2 ± 0.7 | 13.8 ± 1.1 NS | 13.7 ± 0.9 NS | 13.5 ± 0.7 NS | 13.4 ± 0.9 NS |
| MCH (pg) | 19.5 ± 0.9 | 18.9 ± 0.7 NS | 19.1 ± 0.7 NS | 19.4 ± 0.8 NS | 19 ± 1.1 NS |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 33.8 ± 0.9 | 33.3 ± 0.3 NS | 33 ± 0.8 NS | 33.5 ± 0.9 NS | 33.2 ± 0.6 NS |
| MCV (μm3) | 56.6 ± 2.1 | 56.6 ± 1.3 NS | 57.4 ± 1.1 NS | 57.6 ± 1.8 NS | 57.4 ± 1.9 NS |
| PLT (103/mm3) | 482 ± 48.3 | 498 ± 36 NS | 526 ± 37.4 NS | 506 ± 42.8 NS | 519 ± 43.5 NS |
| RBC (106/mm3) | 7.3 ± 0.7 | 7.2 ± 0.6 NS | 7.1 ± 0.5 NS | 7 ± 0.4 NS | 7.1 ± 0.4 NS |
| WBC (103/mm3) | 2.4 (1.2–4.2) | 1.8 (1.5–3.1) NS | 1.9 (1.3–3) NS | 2.1 (1.1–2.7) NS | 2.3 (1.9–2.9) NS |
HCT—hematocrit; HGB—hemoglobin; IS—indoxyl sulfate; MCH—mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC—mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV—mean corpuscular volume; NS—non-significant; PLT—platelet; RBC—red blood cells; WBC—white blood cells; VEH—control group.
Scheme 1Flow-chart of experimental procedures. 5-HT—serotonin; ADP—adenosine diphosphate; HPLC—high performance liquid chromatography; IS—indoxyl sulfate; ROTEM—rotational thromboelastometry.