Literature DB >> 28753800

Correlation Between Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (Cellvizio®) and Histological Grading of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Step Forward for a Better Selection of Patients Suitable for Conservative Management.

Alberto Breda1, Angelo Territo2, Andrea Guttilla3, Francesco Sanguedolce2, Martina Manfredi4, Luigi Quaresima2, Jose M Gaya2, Ferran Algaba5, Joan Palou2, Humberto Villavicencio2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent growing interest in the conservative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), the diagnostic process is still a challenge for the risk of tumor undergrading. Real-time confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) provides in vivo microscopic images of tissues using a low-energy laser light source.
OBJECTIVE: To describe our initial experience with CLE for the real-time characterization of UTUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen flexible ureteroscopies (f-URS) were performed at our center with CLE for UTUC. Lesions were preoperatively identified at computed tomography-intravenous urography. Cellvizio system was used during f-URS to perform CLE on the targeted lesions. Biopsies were then performed. INTERVENTION: f-URS with CLE. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Surgeon's CLE readings (low-grade/high-grade/carcinoma in situ [CIS]) were documented in the operation notes. A dedicated genitourinary pathologist-blinded to the surgeon reading-examined all specimens. A third person collected prospectively the CLE readings and the histopathological reports. Cohen's Kappa analysis was performed to test interobserver agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The mean diameter of tumors at computed tomography scan was 26mm (range, 5-50mm). In eight patients, CLE allowed to obtain images compatible with low-grade UTUC, in five patients with high-grade UTUC, and in one case with CIS. We found correspondence between the CLE images and the final histopathological results in seven out of seven cases of low-grade UTUC (100%), in five out of six cases of high-grade UTUC (83%), and in one out of one case of CIS (100%). Substantial agreement was found at interobserver agreement (k=0.64) between CLE and histological reading. No complications and/or limitations related to the use of CLE were recorded.
CONCLUSIONS: CLE is a promising new technology in providing a reliable real-time histological characterization of UTUC lesions. Ideal targets might be UTUC patients potentially candidates for conservative management. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We believe that a conservative treatment for low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma is an option that must be considered. The diagnostic process is still lacking of accurate tools. In this study, we find that confocal laser endomicroscopy, using the Cellvizio system, seems to help the clinician to have a real-time histological characterization of upper tract urothelial carcinoma lesions. This could better select patients for a conservative treatment.
Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confocal laser endomicroscopy; Flexible ureteroscopy; Upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28753800     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  12 in total

1.  Reflections on personalized management of UTUC.

Authors:  Marianne Brehmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  UTUC in 2017: Emerging evidence on treating upper tract urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Grande; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Optical biopsy of bladder cancer using confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Jie Wu; Yu-Chen Wang; Bo Dai; Ding-Wei Ye; Yi-Ping Zhu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Investigation of confocal microscopy for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma versus benign tissue. Can an optical biopsy be performed?

Authors:  Michael C Phung; Andrew R Rouse; Jayce Pangilinan; Robert C Bell; Erika R Bracamonte; Sharfuddeen Mashi; Arthur F Gmitro; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-12-24

5.  Ex-vivo Imaging of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Using Novel pH Low Insertion Peptide (Variant 3), a Molecular Imaging Probe.

Authors:  Joseph Brito; Borivoj Golijanin; Ohad Kott; Anna Moshnikova; Catrina Mueller-Leonhard; Boris Gershman; Oleg A Andreev; Yana K Reshetnyak; Ali Amin; Dragan Golijanin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Risk stratification for upper tract urinary carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Benamran; Thomas Seisen; Elias Naoum; Christophe Vaessen; Jérome Parra; Pierre Mozer; Shahrokh F Shariat; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-08

7.  Novel real-time optical imaging modalities for the detection of neoplastic lesions in urology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Oliver Brunckhorst; Qi Jia Ong; Daniel Elson; Erik Mayer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Optimal Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Zhenbang Liu; Teck Wei Tan; Yee Mun Lee; Eu Kiang Yeo; Yew-Lam Chong
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Grzegorz Fojecki; Anders Magnusson; Olivier Traxer; Joyce Baard; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther; Georg Jaremko; Christian Seitz; Thomas Knoll; Guido Giusti; Marianne Brehmer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: friend or foe?

Authors:  Angelo Territo; Andrea Gallioli; Iacopo Meneghetti; Matteo Fontana; Jordi Huguet; Joan Palou; Alberto Breda
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2021-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.