Literature DB >> 28753696

Colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection using a novel, flat-base over-the-scope clip: a prospective study.

Yara Backes1, Wouter F W Kappelle1, Luuk Berk2, Arjun D Koch3, John N Groen4, Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel5, Matthijs P Schwartz6, Marjon Kerkhof7, Peter D Siersema1, Roland Schröder8, T G Tan9, Miangela M Lacle10, Frank P Vleggaar1, Leon M G Moons1.   

Abstract

Background and study aims We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new, flat-based over-the-scope clip (Padlock Clip) for colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR). Patients and methods We prospectively included 26 patients with lesions < 20 mm. Indications for eFTR were re-resection of the scar of a low risk malignant polyp (n = 11), recurrent adenoma in a non-lifting scar (n = 10), non-lifting polyp (n = 4), and an adenoma located in a diverticulum (n = 1). Results Technical success rate and full-thickness resection rate were 100 % (26/26) and 92 % (24/26), respectively. Median procedure time was 43 minutes (IQR 27 - 56). No complications occurred during the procedure; 3 complications (12 %) occurred within 48 hours, of which one was a perforation requiring laparoscopic suturing. Specimen volumes from eFTR of scar tissue where the original polyp had been ≥ 20 mm (n = 13) were smaller compared with those from non-scar resections or scars where the original polyps had been < 20 mm (n = 13) (median 0.8 vs. 1.5 cm3, P = 0.03). Conclusions In this first series of colorectal eFTR using the Padlock Clip, feasibility was demonstrated. It was relatively safe in view of surgery as the alternative treatment, but could still benefit from technical refinement. Future studies should explore for which indication this technique is most suitable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR5562 (Dutch Trial Register). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28753696     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-114730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in endoscopic resection: a review of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER).

Authors:  Ishita Dalal; Iman Andalib
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-04-25

2.  Modified line-assisted complete closure of the defect after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection: a pilot study in porcine models.

Authors:  Yasushi Yamasaki; Masayasu Ohmori; Junki Toyosawa; Soichiro Ako; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 3.  Current Endoscopic Resection Techniques for Gastrointestinal Lesions: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Submucosal Dissection, and Full-Thickness Resection.

Authors:  Arthur Hoffman; Raja Atreya; Timo Rath; Markus Ferdinand Neurath
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 4.  Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments.

Authors:  Franz Ludwig Dumoulin; Ralf Hildenbrand
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Quality of endoscopy reporting at index colonoscopy significantly impacts outcome of subsequent EMR in patients with > 20 mm colon polyps.

Authors:  Gottumukkala Raju; Phillip Lum; William Ross; Selvi Thirumurthi; Ethan Miller; Patrick Lynch; Jeffrey Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Mehnaz A Shafi; Brian Weston; Boris Blechacz; George J Chang; Katherine Hagan; Asif Rashid; Marta Davila; John Stroehlein
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-02-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.